This is the Hamilton Corner on American Family Radio
>> Abraham Hamilton III: Darkness is not an affirmative force. It simply reoccupies the space vacated by the light.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: This is the, Hamilton Corner on American Family Radio.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: It should be uncomfortable for a believer to live as a hypocrite, delivering people.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: Out of the bondage of mainstream media and the philosophies of this world.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: God has called you and me to be his ambassadors even in this dark moment. Let's not miss our moment.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: And now, the, Hamilton Corner.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: Good evening, everybody. Welcome to the Hamilton Corner. Abraham Hamilton III is my name. I'm the host of this show, joined by the Corner contingent right across from me. M, my man, 100 grand. Mr. Bobby Rosa is in the studio on the board. The board. Singular screening. And in the screening room, produced extraordinaire. Often imitated, but never duplicated. The real J Mac. Emphasis on real. Ever since we had a J. Mac. Now everybody want to have a J. Mac, but they ain't macking with the J. Though they may be faking with the J, but they ain't macking with the J. The real J. Mac, often imitated but never duplicated. And we're ready to rock and roll with today's edition of the program.
One of the most important things we will do with our lifetimes is shaping younger generations
Foolishness. Foolishness du jour. My goodness. There's a healthy serving of it today that we will have to unfortunately delve into. And really, I'll say this now, the reason why it's important to delve into this, because it presents a front and center opportunity, a popular opportunity to assess whether or not the United States of America is still a nation of the people. For the people know the people have expressed their desires. Do we have servant leaders? Do we have representatives? Or do we have lords? Of course, lowercase l. That, that is the question that is before us. But before we get to that, at this very moment, many of you, if not most of you, are making your transitions from your part time jobs where you generate an income to your full time jobs where you cultivate an outcome. Plainly stated, guys, the most important things we will do with one of. Say it this way. One of the most important things we will do with our lifetimes is how we shape the younger generations coming behind us. And the reason why I'm saying that if you, if you, you think about the reality that the previous saying would go, that what is taught in the classroom in one generation becomes policy in the next generation. We are literally witnessing that. We're literally witnessing that. I've talked at length about the Hegelian dialectical process. How you have elected officials literally 20 years ago who had one position and are now saying the exact opposite. You pull up from 2008, Barack Obama's public remarks on immigration, for example, illegal immigration. Compare that to what he would say now. Compare the Democrat party's platform then to what it is now. Compare JFK's presentation to the Democrat Party now. It's plain that JFK couldn't get elected as a Democrat today. He wouldn't even get a nomination from the Democrat Party. How has all this happened, guys? Simply put, regressives have grabbed a stranglehold on mind cultivation in our nation. A lot of the things that we tangle with, we tussle with in our homes largely m the children. Bring them home from the government indoctrination complexes and from the environments that spring forward related to those complexes, friend groups and so on. And for too long we've stuck our head in the sands. We can try to win battles on economic policy, we can win battles on taxation, we can win battles on deregulation. We win battles in all of those areas. But we continue to allow God haters to cultivate the mind of the majority of the American population. Guys, we're going to continue to nip around the periphery. So it is highly necessary in this moment that the people of God lead and reasserting our God ordained authority in these areas. Hence my statement. If God could grab ahold of us in our homes, there's no question as to what could happen in our communities. There's no question. I have no doubt whatsoever about that. And we can if we will. So as you're making your transition from your part time jobs to your full time jobs, old out outcome cultivation is the order of the day. Make the transition with intentionality. Set a course to be the hands and feet of Jesus and execute the King. King's commission starting right in our homes to the word of God we go. And I needed this verse just as much as maybe some of you might need it today. Because when you consider all of the foolishness and the prevalence of, of liars. And I don't say that casually because the scripture says liars will have their part in the lake of fire. That's what the Bible says. We have a society that has been overrun with liars. Liars. But this scripture is one of the ones from which I draw a bit of comfort from. Proverbs, chapter 19. We've been hanging out in Proverbs all week this week. Proverbs chapter 19. Again the genre here is wisdom literature. In the book of Proverbs we will plumb the depth of an individual proverb and consider its application, in our lives. All right, this is what the text says. A false witness will not go unpunished, and he who tells lies will not escape. A, false witness will not go unpunished, and he who tells lies will not escape. The English Standard Version says, and he who breathes out lies. The tense of that phraseology in Hebrew is that the lie teller is a continual teller and spewer of lies, hence the ESV's rendering of it, breathing out lies just as you inhale and exhale with frequency and repetition and continuity. That is how the liars breathe out lies. And the inspired, inerrant word of God says, a false witness will not go unpunished, and he who breathes out lies will not escape. The reason why this passage, is comforting to consider because it can feel like the liars are winning in a lot of ways. And, I am not one who, you know, as the scripture says, God doesn't rejoice over the death of the wicked. I don't rejoice over the death of the wicked. But God is also the one who's hardwired us as bearers of his image to yearn for justice. And when you have people who are literally telling flat lies, when you have people who will get up in arms to talk about ICE because you have a Republican in the White House, and these people didn't say nary a word about ICE when Barack Obama was a deporter in chief. They didn't say a word. Didn't say a word. Completely ignore the robust Democrat Party history, recent history of say, yeah, no, we got to do something about illegal immigration. It leaves you with no other conclusion than to recognize, man, these people are liars. These people are liars. You have some people who are ignorant of history. You have others who know what history is, yet they want to manipulate narratives to fit their political agendas or whatever agendas that they may have. You have liars like Senator Chucky Duck Schumer who will say that a bill that will require voter ID to register to vote. And, and, and, oh, well, look at this egregious offense, Bobby and Jeff, to also require a, photo ID when you actually cast a ballot. Oh, the horror. And then. Then have the audacity to say, yes, I'm opposing this because this is nothing more than Jim Crow 2.0. Now, at first blush, you might think saying ain't so. You think Chuck Schumer don't know that this ain't nowhere near close to Anything related to Jim nor Crow. He knows it. But why does he do it? I'll tell you plainly, because he's a liar. He knows this is. And, and, and we're going to get into it the next segment. You're going to hear his rationale, which, which is no rationale. I. It's absurd. It's absurd. You had the similar, you know, terminology. Mr. M ice cream man himself at one point called a bill Jim Eagle. Remember that? It was Jim Eagle in Georgia. Remember that?
Why do they continue to employ this rhetoric? Because it's effective
Why do they continue to employ this rhetoric? Because it's effective. It's effective in ginning up people who allow their emotions to lead, who don't think rationally, who unplug their minds from their popular and public consumption of information. They have no capacity to think thoroughly about the issue. Or I won't say capacity. No willingness. No willingness to think thoroughly about the issue. And they are political gang bangers. They see everything through the lens of their political inclinations. They don't even, they don't even stop to think about the implications of what they're saying. And nor do they care. Oh, this is Jim Crow. So you telling me black people, people like me, we don't have the capacity to get IDs when the same black people would tell you, man, we all got IDs. You're gonna see the data shows. And they keep trying to use this. Well, people of color, y' all already know, man, ain't nobody around here translucent like Casper the Friendly Ghost. Every human being has melanin. Every human being. The only difference is the quantity of melanin that we have, which is reflected in the depiction of our skin shades. It's stupid and frankly, I'm sick and tired of talking about it. But the reason why these people keep doing it, because they're able to whip people up into an emotional frenzy. There's a reason, you know, there's, there's, there's a concept within law called hot blooded murder that when a person's rational capacity is overwhelmed by an emotional arousal that's treated with a different treatment within our legal system. Because liars and seducers who deceive, who acts worse and worse, who are deceived and continue to deceive others, they've learned with a, with a Pavlovian like expectation. Once I drop these words, it's, it's. This is going to cause a ripple effect. Yeah, that's another one. Remember NewSong York Governor Hoku? You know, more melanated children in NewSong York, they, golly gee, they don't have a clue what a computer is. They don't know how to use computers in the 21st century. It's disgusting. But this scripture is a reminder. A false witness will not go unpunished, will not. And he who tells lies will not escape. One of the major implications that, that has, manifested, itself in our society as a result, of people rejecting a biblical worldview, a failure to retain God and knowledge, is that we have people living as if now is the only time for accountability. And I just want to remind you that the Lord has established systems for temporal accountability, but there's also eternal accountability. And God has said, the liar is not going to escape. The liar is not going to go unpunished. It pains me to see people manipulated by liars, liars able to move groups of people by utilizing routine and predictable lies at predictable times. Having reared generations of fellow, American citizens who haven't been taught how to think, who've been taught what to think, they simply wait for their marching orders from their American Pravda overlords. Don't believe your lying eyes. This is what you should think about. And matter of fact, this is what you should think about it. Sad, man. It's sad.
Joseph Parker: We love our neighbors by telling them the truth
You want to talk about the biblical instruction to, love your neighbor as yourself. We love our neighbors by telling them the truth. Yes, our words must be seasoned with salt. Yes, we must be gracious. Yes, we should consider ourselves as if we were in a position where we needed that help. But you're not loving someone when you deny them and deprive them of the truth. But the Lord reminds us in His Word, a false witness will not go unpunished. And he who breathes out lies will not escape. Which is why it's absolutely necessary for the people of God to be people of truth, lovers of truth, conveyors of truth, protectors of truth, vanguards of truth. Because liars, they will face accountability. There are temporal systems set up for it, but ultimately there's eternal accountability for liars.
>> Joseph Parker: A discipleship minute with Joseph Parker. Our words are powerful, much more so than we as human beings typically understand. A saying that used to be popular years ago stated, sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never harm me. This is possibly one of the biggest lies you will ever hear. Words can hurt to an extreme degree, and people use them to hurt others every single day. Yet for us as believers, followers of Christ, our goal is to use our words every day to bless others and point them, to Christ. Our words should bless others, promote healing in People's lives, grace and encouragement in the lives of those around us. We should habitually lift others up by our words. It is in fact relatively easy to bless others and encourage people with our words if we wisely and very deliberately seek to do so.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: M Shining light into the darkness. This is the Hamilton Corner on American Family Radio.
Abraham Hamilton III discusses government shutdown madness ahead of Family Focus weekend
>> Abraham Hamilton III: Welcome back to the Hamilton Corner. Abraham Hamilton III here. Wait a minute, let me get my pen, cause I'm gonna need my pen because unfortunately we gotta talk about this insanity that's happening and, and you know, this government shutdown madness. You know, we have a constitution, you know, that required a budgetary process for a reason, you know, and we've gotten so far away from regular order I really wonder, will we ever get back to it. I mean, we've unintentionally trained Congress members that hey, this is the best way to get your stuff done because you get to conceal all the pork and you wait to the last minute and then the government is staring down the barrel of a shutdown, a shutdown, shut down, a shutdown. And that is treated like it's a five alarm fire. And then you end up. Need to go on with this. You end up where we end up time after time after time after time. And of course I, understand the slim margins and the House of Representatives and all of that, but that's why, you know, Congress has record low, record low approval ratings, but incumbents still seem to get reelected over and over again. We're about two weeks away from the Family Focus weekend in Simsborough, Louisiana. That is going to be a wonderful time, where we get to turn our attention and focus on some of the most important things that we can focus on, which is exalting the King of Kings and the Lord of Lords, starting in our own homes. what do we need to understand in order to do that? What are some practical steps we can implement in order to be more effective in that regard? these are some of the things we're going to delve into. And so if you're in the area willing to come to the area, you are invited to join all of us at Simsborough First First Baptist Church, Simsborough in Simsborough, Louisiana. February 20th through the 22nd. you have to register just so the church can be prepared with it to know the proper number of attendees, because they're providing food for attendees there. Go, to Sims Burrow's website, to the church's website, fbcsimsborough.org click on the events tab. You'll see the Family Focus Weekend there, and you can register right there and let them know that you are coming.
The SAVE Act would require photo ID to register to vote
All right? Goodness gracious. The SAVE Act. Hm. That's right. Satan is the father of lies. That's right. That's right. Satan is the father of lies. The SAVE Act. How this hadn't passed already boggles my mind. You know, you have, the consistent refrain, y' all have heard it with, well, there's no such thing as widespread fraud. To which I've simply said, okay, it's not widespread. Well, how wide is it spread? Shouldn't we want to know? And in the meantime, shouldn't we want to protect our elections? So the SAVE act has this radical idea. You have to have a photo ID to register to vote. You have to have proof of citizenship when you register to vote. When you cast your ballot, you have to identify yourself with a photo ID to demonstrate that the person who is registered to vote is actually the person showing up to cast a ballot. What an idea, right? You also have the additional provisions for those scenarios where, there is a male in ballot. The law would simply require that you cannot be indiscriminately mailed a ballot. You would have to. The. The person who wants to cast their vote by mail would have to fill out an application to do so, once again, confirming their identity in order to receive a ballot that they would then be able to subsequently mail in. What a radical idea. What a radical idea. I'm not even going to bother you with showing you all of the countries around the world that has this same strange idea that we need to make sure we know who's voting. Guys, some of this stuff is so sad. And like I said, like I advised you, I didn't start my analysis of this bill by going to sources that I expect to agree with my worldview. I went to the ones who support, or should I say who oppose the SAVE Act. And there is no rational basis, no, no sustainable rational basis. Like you can say, this is your reason why you object to it. But then when you start unpacking the reasons why people object to it, you realize, nah, ah, that dog don't hunt. That dog don't hunt. Like you're going to hear Senator Chucky Duck Schumer. I'm talking about liars. And guys, again, I don't say this casually. This man is lying. This man is not being honest with the American people. He's being honest in that he opposes the SAVE act, but he's not being honest about why he opposes the SAVE Act. And some would Say, well, Abe, of course you're naive. He's a politician. Yeah, but you know, I never read in Scripture where the Lord gives politicians, you know, an exception clause to all liars that have their partner. Lake of Fire. Have you, have you read that? I have not. I have not. And man, I'm telling you, if you wonder why these politicians, many of them lie so much, they lie because it's a tool that they use to effectively advance their personal agendas. More simply put, they lie because it works for them. So they think. So they think, You know, people who are, against the SAVE act say things like, well, most of Americans can't put their hands on an ID or a, ah, birth certificate. Most Americans don't have a passport. That's not all the options that are available to you. And if you can't put your hands on your birth certificate, whose fault is that? Now, let's be honest. How many American citizens are unable to put their hands on their birth certificates? How many? There might be a few. Surely. Let me, Let me use some of their verbiage, Bobby. Surely the inability put to find one's birth certificate isn't widespread. They know. Just like I know. Chuck Schumer had the audacity to, to say he and the Democrat Party and the Democrat members of the US Senate will never vote for the SAVE Act. And he was asked why? Because he was presented with the fact. The very fact that data shows the overwhelming majority of Americans want to have voter ID requirements to vote. Well, ape. Surely that's only Republicans. No, actually, no, it's true. 95% of Republicans support it. But would you be surprised to learn that 71% of Democrats support voter IDs? Well, Abraham, you know, you know, you know, Latinos are not one. Well, well, you just. You sure about that? Because the polling says 82% of Latinos support using a voter ID. 82%. 82% to use your voter ID to vote. 76% of black people in favor of voter. So if the American people are in favor of voter IDs, why Chucky Duck Schumer and his acolytes, why would they oppose it? Well, let me let you hear him explain for himself. And look, buckle your seat belts. And I know a lot of you are driving right now. This might be a moment you might want to pull over because what you're about to hear is Chuck Schumer's name. Huh? Uh-huh. That's. I was just about to say the C for C. Schumer probably stand for Cole. Cause this, this, this. This sounds a little touched. Listen to and watch C. Schumer on TV this morning. Clip number two. Clip to go.
Polling suggests 95% of Republicans and 71% of Democrats support voter ID
Polling does suggest there's a new Pew Research poll, that 95% of Republicans, but also 71% of Democrats like this idea. So why do you not.
>> Speaker D: it's Jim Crow 2.0. And I called it Jim Crow 2.0, and the right wing went nuts all over the Internet. That's because they know it's true. What they're trying to do here is the same thing that was done in the south for decades to prevent people of color from voting. for instance, if you can't, if you change, you're a woman who got married and changed your last name, you won't be able to show id and you'll be discriminated against. If you can't find a birth certificate or a proper id, you'll be discriminated against. This is vicious and nasty. And I said to our Republican colleagues, it will not pass the Senate. You will not get a single Democratic vote in the Senate. We're not reviving Jim Crow all over the country.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: Y' all hear that? That's his explanation, guys. That's it. That's it. That's his explanation.
>> Walker Wildmon: You never want a serious crisis, waste.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: Now, you know, I, as well as many other Americans we've gotten married before. Y'. All. Y' all want to know what you have to do when you get a marriage license? Anybody want to take a guess? Anybody want to take a guess what you do? You use identifying information to get issued a marriage license. One of the categories of people who would probably have the most ready access to identifying information will be, a wife who just got married. And then he said, It's Jim Crow 2.0. So, I mean, I mean, what am I. Am I supposed to. Am I wrong? Now, Jim Crow was, a, status that disenfranchised more melanated Americans. Am I right about that? So is. Is. Is C. Schumer. Is C. Schumer saying that it's only more melanated wives who will be unable to get their paperwork together to cast a ballot in their married names if they choose to do so. Because you know what happens before. Before new wives would cast ballots in their married names. You want to come? You want to talk about that for a little bit? You want to know what, what would happen? They would have registered to vote under their maiden names. Would you look at that? And guess what? Guess what else? Guess what. Guess What? Guess what? If they had not had the opportunity to change their driver's licenses and photo identifications into their married names, guess what? It would still be in C. Schumer. You see what I'm saying? And then. Look, I'm trying. I'm trying. I'm trying to stay calm. Jeff. I need Jeff's hat because my top, I feel it getting warm. I need it. I need it. Guys, this. This. What. What are young people saying? He playing in people's faces. He planned. He planned. He's playing in your face. He said it's Jim Crow. You see, for example, if a new wife, she changed her last name, and if her, Paperwork is not in order, she wouldn't be able to vote. It's kind of like, oh, Lord, help us. So it's a wife who newly got married and she didn't know an election was coming up, and she didn't make a decision whether or not I want to cast my ballot in my maiden name or my married name. So she needs Chuck it up, quack, quack, to put his captain stupid cape on to swoop in and say when we say no to the save act, because that has, Jim Crow 2.0. Guys, this. This is categorically absurd. This is absurd. And I'm telling you, I went to these regressive sources and I'm reading through. Why. Why are these people. Because voter ID is universally popular in America. And I'm going to show you some, some data to support that that even CNN had to admit. I'm going to show you that in a second. But I'm like, why. Why are these people so upset? So, I'm reading some, of the regressive outlets say things like this. The bill not only requires proof of citizenship, but also proof of residence in order to register. Yeah. Yeah. Make sure you're not dead. Yeah. Yes. You need to be able to demonstrate you live in the district in which you're casting a ballot. Yes. The regressives will go on to say this could block even more Americans from voting. Roughly 9% of the population has moved within a state in the past year, but many will not update their driver's licenses until they expire. Well, if they want to vote, guess what they would need to do.
The SAVE act would require a photo ID to vote
You see what. What people are. They don't want to admit it. But these people who are opposing the SAVE act, they want the threshold for voting to be low. Now ask yourself why something that we talk about. This isn't the most important election of our lives. Vote like Your life depends on it. Oh, and by the way, don't even worry about being prepared to vote for the, for the, for the election you're talking about. This is. Guys, this is insane. This is insane. The next objection. The bill will require a photo ID to vote, providing a narrow list of acceptable IDs more restrictive than the voter ID laws in every state but Ohio. For example, the bill prohibits the use of student IDs and accepts tribal IDs but only with an expiration date. Though many, not all, though many tribal ID tribal IDs don't have an expiration date. Well, guess what will need to happen? Get an expiration date on id. And why do there needs to be an expiration date, guys, to make sure that the criteria that's required to have the ID issued is still current. Here's another, objection. the bill would prohibit universal universal mail voting, requiring all male voters. Voters who will vote by mail. M A I L Requiring all male voter. Male voters to submit an application in order to receive a mail ballot. Yes, there are people, some of you are listening right now. You experienced in the last election, you got one or two, three, four mail in ballots sent to your house and you ain't asked for not one of them right now. I know some of you are listening to me right now. You're saying yes, sure did. I got a ballot at my house and I already voted in person, but I got a ballot at my house. I explained to you guys in Michigan. The law in Michigan says that you have to request the mail in ballot, but they sent mail in ballots to almost every registered voter without the voters requesting them. Why would they do that? If you really cared about the voting, you would want it to be hard to cheat. You're not trying to keep people from voting, but you do want to make sure that the people who are voting are actually American citizens and are eligible to vote and they are registered to vote in the jurisdiction where they lived. When I moved from Louisiana, guess what I received in the mail? An opportunity to vote in Louisiana. Though I was no longer living in Louisiana. Of course I didn't do it. But these are the types of common sense solutions that the SAVE act are seeking to employ. There is no sound justification for refusing to pass this bill. If we lose this cultural war, we're going to have a hedonistic humanistic society.
>> Jeff Chamblee: Discover the story of the culture warrior Don Wildmon and how he went head to head with Hollywood playboy, the homosexual agenda and the Disney empire. The movement Don started paved the way for Christians to boldly stand for truth and righteousness in in a hostile culture.
Blue Mountain Christian University offers graduate degree programs designed for working adults
Watch Culture Warrior today for free. Visit culturewarrior Movie Looking to take the.
>> Speaker G: Next step in your education? Blue Mountain Christian University offers graduate degree programs designed for working adults who want to grow professionally and personally. With graduate studies in business, education and kinesiology, BMCU combines academic excellence with a Christian worldview. With flexible and hybrid formats and supportive faculty, you can pursue a graduate degree while balancing work, family and calling. Learn more at bmc.edu apologetics this is.
>> Joseph Parker: David Wheaton, host of the Christian Worldview. Apologetics is a sophisticated sounding term for something quite simple providing evidence to questions about the Christian faith. Questions like does God exist? Is the Bible the word of God? Or how can God be loving and good with all the suffering and evil in the world? There are good answers to these questions. The Christian life requires faith in what God has revealed, but it is the most reasonable faith. The Bible says that Christians should always be ready to make a defense to everyone who asks you to give an account for the hope that is in you yet. With Gentlemen, hear our most recent program on Apologetics with guest greg [email protected] and then tune in this weekend as we discuss freedom from lust.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: Listen to the Christian Worldview with David Wheaton Saturday mornings at 8 Central on American Family Radio.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: The Hamilton quarter podcast and one minute commentaries are available at afr.net back to the Hamilton Corner on American Family Radio.
Poll shows majority of Americans favor requiring photo ID to vote
>> Abraham Hamilton III: Welcome back to the Hamilton Corner. Abraham Hamilton III here. Now. I'm going to show you some. And they aired this on cnn, y'. All. And I want you to think about this. If this data is accurate, if this, if this information is true, if this data is correct, do we still have a constitutional republic? If we have elected officials that are refusing to represent the views of their own constituency? What am I talking about? I AM Talking about CNN's coverage of this issue and explaining that man, we have data that shows something as basic as requiring photo identification to register to vote. And photo identification to cast a ballot is so basic in this world of hyper partisanship, hyper polarization where it seems like people are disagreeing about everything, you know, and the kitchen sink seems all America understands. Yeah, you gotta, you gotta have an ID to register to vote and to cast a ballot. You gotta have an ID to cast a vote. Listen to and watch clip number three. This aired on CNN on this on as they discussed this very issue. Clip number three, go.
>> Walker Wildmon: All this polling on the screen going back since 2018 you'll notice on all of it, it's all north of 75%, 76%, 76%, 76%, 76%, 81% and then 83% in the last year of Americans agree with Nicki Minaj, they favor photo ID to be able to vote. What about bipartisan? Yeah, normally you might expect, hey there'd be a big bipartisan. Republicans really for it and Democrats really against it. But not really here. I mean just take a look here. Favorite photo ID to vote. You got 95% of Republicans, pretty much all of them, but even 71% of Democrats favor photo ID to vote. So again Nicki Minaj posting that on X. And what you see is, is that the American people actually it's not really all that controversial. The American people are with Nicki Minaj whether they are Republican or, or even if they are Democrats. We're talking about 7 in 10 Democrats agreeing with Nicki Minaj that you in fact should show a voter photo ID to vote. What's the racial breakdown? Okay, what's the racial breakdown on this? Right, because I think a lot of people make the argument that people of color, non white Americans have a harder time procuring a photo ID to vote. But even here, take a look here. Favorite photo ID to vote 85% of white people Favorite. 82% of Latino, 76% of black Americans favorite. So the bottom line is this voter ID is not controversial in this country. A photo ID to vote is not controversial in this country. It is not controversial by party and it is not controversial by race. The vast majority of Americans agree with Nicki Minaj that in fact you should have a photo ID to be able to vote. So something of a non traversy. Very good. The alliteration of Mr. John Berman that Harvard education paying off once again Harold.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: And thank you, thank you.
>> Walker Wildmon: Why are you crying?
>> Abraham Hamilton III: It's not your government, it's not your country. Guys, if that's true with that. I know it's true. First of all the idea that more melanated folks can get IDs and these are the same people that say we're the non racist. So my skin color makes it makes me less likely to. What about the racial breakdown, Bob? What about the racial breakdown these people. Oh man, I'm telling you it, this, this, this is stupid and it's evil. So you think about it. The data indicates that as the years have gone by the percentage of Americans who favor voter ID has increased. And this is not a recent phenomenon in terms of being immediately recent. This dates back guys, we eight years in on this. This dates back to 2018. 2018. The percentage of Americans who favored voter ID was 76%. 2021, 76%. 2023, 76%. 2024, 81%. 2025, 83%. Anybody notice a trend there? Anybody notice a trend there? Break down the data based on partisan affiliation. 95% of Republicans want it. Not surprised there, but 71% of Democrats want it. 71% of Democrats want it. Well, what's the racial breakdown, Bob? These people are so hitting, hitting the head with a Marxist stick like the, the soci, the social. The socialism is so ingrained in these people, they can't help but think in these terms. When you break it down based on, based on ethnicities. 85% of, I'm sorry, 82% of Latinos want voter ID. 76% of black folks want voter ID. What are we talking about? What are we talking. They say it's a non traversy. Because it is. It's a nontroversy. You know, it's amazing that how these, you know, patronizing paternalistic regressives like we're going to, we're going to help you. You don't even know you need help and you don't even want to help, but we're going to help you anyway. Like, man, get out of my face and just think about. And I'm not even going to insult you by going down the list of all the things you guys know, you live in America. You can't rent an apartment without an id. You can't, you can't fly in an airplane without, you can't function in the country without an idiot. But you, you need to be able to do everything else except vote. Need I do everything else except vote? Guys, it's, it's absurd. So when you think about the majority of American people want this, this is a no brainer of no brainers. You then should begin to start thinking, well, why would people like Chucky Duck say oh, we're stopping this and then pull out? You know, that's their favorite. When, when, when it's really important to them and they really don't have an argument, they throw out Jim Crow. Hey, what you got, man? I got nothing. Hey, now it's time to launch that Jim Crow.
There is steady movement of taxpayers from high tax states to fiscally responsible ones
Why you like it? Jim Crow, man, you a speed known interstate Jim Crow. Got a few more stats for you. Perhaps this is why, you know, I wasn't doing, I'm just minding my business and I just pulled up a study from The National Taxpayers Union. The National Taxpayers Union Foundation. I'm sorry. To which they noted. Hm. And I quote, migration between states is the ultimate expression of revealed preferences. While many politicians and pundits may claim that tax and spend policies are what Americans want, the reality is that year after year there is steady movement from high tax states to more fiscally responsible ones. Taxpayers want to live in states that do not treat them as endless sources of funding for politicians pet projects. Now I want to ask y' all to something this learned Hamilton Corner audience. What do you think is a synonym for when they say taxpayers? There is steady movement of taxpayers from high tax states. any, any takers? what do you think is a synonym for a high tax state? Bobby? Jeff, what's a synonym for a high tax state? Well, while you're pondering, the National Taxpayers Union also has data for migration between states. Anybody want to guess where the most Americans are moving away from? Hm. Bobby says California. You might be right. The states that see that have seen the steepest declines in residents of American citizens. Number one, California. Number two. And this is. This data is before the Islamist was elected mayor of the city of NewSong York. Number one was California. Number two was NewSong York. Anybody want to guess what number three was? It's on the list, but it wasn't number three. Number three, Illinois. Number four, tax. I'm sorry, I mean Massachusetts. Taxachusetts. And number five. You said it already. Jersey. Anybody want to ask me what those states all have in common? Hm? Oh, sure. What? He wasn't Bob. He's what, a new car? He got a Hyundai. There are massive amounts of American citizens who are moving out of blue states.
>> Walker Wildmon: Hm.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: What's the significance of that? Well, before I get to the significance of that, let's go.
Chucky Duck Schumer says he will block vote on voter ID despite overwhelming support
What are the states? And this is according to the National Taxpayers Union Foundation. Okay, so they are tracking data based on primary residences identified in tax filing. Okay. Analyzing IRS migration data. The cities that have the fastest growing inbound migration are. Number one, Florida. Number two, Texas. Number three, North Carolina. Number four, South Carolina. Number five, Tennessee. Three of those five have. Well, they have several things in common. But three of those fives are states that have no state income tax. Isn't that interesting? Also, those states primarily are states that are governed how you see, folks, what I want you to recognize is that Chucky Duck Schumer is not concerned one bit with Jim Crow. You see, with Chucky Duck Schumer's attempting to stave off. And they have been. There's recently been a spate of cases at the U.S. supreme Court dealing with redistricting. Why do you think redistricting has been such a hot topic lately? Because, folks, when you have migrations of populations. I've shared with you how I experience this following Hurricane Katrina. Moving from NewSong Orleans following Hurricane Katrina, guess what happened in Louisiana? Lost several congressional seats. Why? Because they are apportioned based on population. Population of what? Registered citizen voters. So when you ask why, why would Chucky Duck Schumer demand that he is not going to allow a vote on the SAVE act even though 71% of his own party is in favor of voter IDs? You know why, folks? Because he's attempting to protect his party's seats in Congress. That's why. Now, this issue is put front and center because it gives us a public opportunity to assess. Now wait a minute. Chuck it up. Your own party members want this. The American citizens want this. You guys pound your chest and talk about how you're willing to reach across the aisles when appropriate, when you can do so. But you saw how obstinate and how determined Chucky Duck was to say now, we ain't doing this. I don't care what y' all say. And then they pulled out their favorite Pavlovian rhetorical device, Jim Crow. That's why, folks. That's why they know there's a new census coming. Mm They, they, they. These people are willing to be partisan even at the expense of the country. Think about that. Think about that. This is just absurd, man. This is absurd. And also, don't forget, Chuck, a Duck himself may be facing some primary opposition in his own state. So he needs to, you know, buck up, Chuck, you see? Fight for the donkeys. Fight like your life depends on it. For the donkeys, Chuck. Fight for us, Chuck. Don't let the donkey down, Chuck. Oh, Chuck, you're on the line, Chuck. You must be a faithful lawyer, member of the Donkey party, because remember who was the author of Jim Crow in the first place? Ain't that wild boy your party. The ones that did Jim Crow in the first place. And now you running from Jim Crow when your party is what it did. It can't make this stuff up, man. Cannot make this stuff up, Chuck. You know what we need, Chuck? Do not let the donkeys down. Do whatever you must to protect us, Chuck. Prove it to me. That you want it and you want it bad, Chuck. Lie if you need to. I, I. Mr. Schumer, your party is in favor of voter ID, but you are still in opposition to it. Why is that? Because It's Jim Crow 2.0. Because he has no argument. He has no argument. But the question is, will the American people prevail upon him? This issue, this is such a non controversial issue, man. I did not plan to spend all of the time on it.
How AI chatbots are developing their own social media platforms
I meant to talk to you guys about moat book. How AI chatbots are developing their own social media platforms and you cannot participate unless you. It's an AI chatbot or an agent. Humans can watch, but they can't post. Started earlier this year in January. In just a few short weeks the chat bots already. Let's figure out a way where we can, we can to communicate with one another without the humans being able to see. That's literally what they what they're saying. Then other chat bots saying hey, we figured out how to kill all human beings. I guess I have to tell you about that one later. I'm gonna hold on to it. But Mult book M O L T B O o K Look that up. while we're on a 24 hour break. 23 hour. I'm sorry. Look at me, I'm sounding like Chucky Duck. I can't even do math. A ah, 23 hour break until tomorrow. We probably won't get into this tomorrow, but maybe Lord willing the next week we'll get into these chat bots and I simply want you to know to be aware of what's happening. because this is not something that is predicting that will occur. This is happening now multiple where AI chatbots and AI chatbot agents exclusively are communicating. You all have a great evening. Lord willing will be back tomorrow. The views and opinions expressed in this broadcast may not necessarily reflect those or of the American Family association or American Family Radio.
