Hamilton: God has called us to be ambassadors even in this dark moment
>> Abraham Hamilton III: Darkness is not an affirmative force. It simply reoccupies the space vacated by the light.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: This is the, Hamilton Corner on American Family Radio.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: It should be uncomfortable for a believer to live as a hypocrite, delivering people
>> Abraham Hamilton III: out of the bondage of mainstream media and the philosophies of this world.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: God has called you and me to be his ambassadors even in this dark moment. Let's not miss our moment.
Welcome to the Hamilton Corner. Abraham Hamilton III is my name
>> Abraham Hamilton III: And now the, Hamilton Corner.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: Good evening everybody. Welcome to the Hamilton Corner. Abraham Hamilton III is my name. Delighted to be with you yet again, joined by the Corner contingent right across from me, my man, 100 grand, Mr. Bobby, who had a nice dose of half of the Hamiltonian six pack yesterday. He survived to tell about it. That's my children, by the way. Y' all know I have six children? Yeah. Okay. All right. And the screening room produce extraordinaire. Often imitated, never duplicated. The real J. Mack, ladies and gentlemen, m Mr. Jeff McIntosh. And some of y' all may be wondering why I say J. Mac, the real J. Mac. Because I kind of noticed ever since I've been calling out J. Mac, I see all these different programs, they want to have a J. Mac. All of a sudden I was like, what is going on here? Often imitated, but never duplicated. You know what I'm saying? Copiers.
Many of you are making your transition from part time jobs to full time jobs
Well, thank you for tuning in to the program at this very moment. Many of you, if not most of you, are making your transition from your part time jobs to your full time jobs. And I'm speaking to those listening live on the radio right now, those watching live on television, those who are streaming, however you're tuning into the program, we are grateful for you doing so. But as you are making your transition, most of you to your full time jobs, or if you've done it already or you're operating in reverse, we have some people doing that as well. Make, your transition with intentionality. Understanding the primacy that God places on family, we cannot allow the headlines, the things that are transpiring around us to get us to the place to where we become so, overwhelmed, so inundated to where we're lulled into a comfortable negligence. A comfortable negligence. We have to refuse to allow that to occur and welcome the King of Glory to grasp ahold of us personally. Never forget that God's desire for his people is that whatever we engage in, in terms of, external ministry engagements, and I mean sharing, with those beyond ourselves, the Lord's desire is for that to be the overflow of what we Enjoy with him personally. That has. It has to be that, reality. The Lord doesn't want us trying to pour out of empty vessels. He doesn't want us trying to sell what we have not purchased. This is why, when you see the shema in Deuteronomy 6, the first component of Cascading the love for the Lord begins with, you shall love the Lord with all your heart, all your strength, all your soul. You love the Lord with all you are. And once that is established, you teach that love for the Lord that you have diligently, that is God's manner, God's way for us. And that's why you have, wonderful texts like Taste and See that the Lord is good. You know, you have, you know, the woman who met Jesus at the well, she didn't intend to be, you know, hyper evangelist. Check out my card. Follow me on Instagram, face, you know, like, follow, subscribe. None of that. He's like, man, I met a man. And the Scripture says, man, she went, shared with a whole village. You know, that's how God intends for it to work. And the same is true with serving the Lord in our homes, man. We are simply sharing and anchoring our families around the thing that has grasped ahold of us. Like Philippians 3 says, I seek to apprehend that which has apprehended me. Glory to God. So as you're making your transition, man, do so with intentionality. Let the primacy that God places on your faithfulness in your home to govern and guide and guard how you engage in your home. If you're a husband like me, the first external responsibility we have for ministerial investment is our wives. If you're a wife, Listen, listening to the show. Your first responsibility ministerially is to your husband. That's first. That's first. And when I say that the result of you interacting with your spouse should be that you both are growing in the grace and the knowledge of our Lord Jesus Christ to where we're bearing more and more fruit, more and more fruit, becoming more and more like Jesus. Amen.
David Frum: Why do we have a separation of powers in America
Well, we're going to begin the program today in Jeremiah chapter 17, because this is the foundational notion that much of mankind, to date, including many of our fellow countrymen, are fumbling over. And this is where, the issue of divergence truly is. You know, I shared a couple weeks ago, if not. Yeah, it was a couple weeks ago, the late Justice Antonin Scalia explaining what makes our Constitution unique, what makes our form of government unique. And he explained, as powerful and necessary as a declaration of independence, is that our nation is not unique in terms of declaration, of rights like the Bill of Rights, even though obviously those rights are important, but other nations have bill of rights. He talked about how the Soviet, Union in Russia had a declaration of rights that exceeded our Bill of Rights. But what is the major difference? Justice Scalia explained it was a separation of powers. It was a refusal to allow a consolidation of power governmentally, a centralization of it. Well, when you dig a little bit deeper and study Madison's notes on the Constitution, you don't have to wonder, why in all of the civilizations and nations that have been founded in all of mankind's history, why was the United States of America the first nation to have such a diffusion of power? I mean, Justice Scalia even explained, even in the parliamentary system, that the proverbial executive is a feature of parliament, is a creature of Parliament. That's why you don't have any disagreement between, Parliament and the prime ministers, usually. And if the parliament doesn't like the prime ministers, what do they do? They get rid of the prime minister. But why do we have the separation of powers? You study James Madison's notes on the Constitution, you study the Federalist Papers, you study the debates concerning the constitutions, and they will turn you right to where we're going today. In Jeremiah, chapter 17, Jeremiah 17, verses 9 and 10, this is what the Scripture says. The heart is more deceitful than all else and is desperately sick. Or other translations might say, not might say, do say that the heart is desperately wicked. The heart is deceitful and desperately wicked. Who can know it? The NESB here says, who can understand it? Then verse 10 goes on to explain. I, the Lord, search the heart, I test the mind even to give to each man according to his ways, according to the results of his deeds. The major distinction that we're having, the arguments that. That that are. That are percolating in our nation, is they. They really are grounded in whether or not we believe that Jeremiah 17, verses 9 and 10 are true? Verse 9 in particular, when you consider the various worldviews and ideologies that persist in our society, they fundamentally come down to two considerations. Is it God's word that will prevail or man's word? One of the foundational tenets of man's word, which manifests itself in socialism and communism and all these other type of isms and schisms that don't have rhythm, is that a Marxist framework denies man's sinfulness. That's why you have this consistent push for human utopia void of submission to God. I saw a debate earlier, not a debate, I guess it was an interview, old interview between Phil Donahue and Milton Friedman, you know, and Phil Donahue was, he put on his deep concern and compassionate tone of voice and said, you know, Mr. Friedman, when I survey what has transpired under our capitalist society and you see so many instances of greed and abuse, that doesn't it make you wonder and whether or not capitalism is something that we should embrace. To which Milton Friedman responded, said, you think greed is limited to capitalistic framework. So you think there's no greed in Russia, there's no greed in China, there's no greed in China. The reason why the capitalistic framework works better than any of these other systems is because it doesn't deny man's sinfulness. It's the best, not perfect, but the best system at understanding man's sinfulness, in
>> Kevin Freeman: using
>> Abraham Hamilton III: the reality of man's sinfulness to force man to be a benefit to his neighbor. That the only way that you can succeed in a capitalistic system is if you produce something that will benefit your neighbor. If you come up with an invention and it doesn't help anybody's lives get better, it doesn't help anybody do tasks better, it doesn't accomplish anything to benefit someone beyond yourself, then you will not have a, marketable business commodity. You will at best have a hobby within the capitalistic framework. You see, James Madison said this in Federalist 51, quote, it may be a reflection on human nature that such devices, checks and balances should be necessary to control the abuses of government. But what is government itself but the greatest of all reflections on human nature? If men were angels, no government would be necessary. If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary. Guys, that's what it boils down to. That's what it all boils down to. The heart truly is the heart of the matter. And if we reject, let me say it differently, if we deny and reject the biblical truth about mankind's sinful nature, we will suffer the consequences of that rejection. We'll suffer the consequences of that rejection. You know, this is not to sanitize or to aggrandize, a self, selfishness, a self centeredness. But it takes in considerations, takes into consideration the self interested disposition that mankind has and says, well, because this is the way that we are made in order for you to thrive in this system of interacting, because that's truly what it Is, you know, in, economics class, I teach the homeschoolers, I explain what is a market. A market is a place where goods and services are exchanged for remuneration. Well, when you come to market, in order for your offering to be beneficially exchanged, it has to be a benefit to someone else. Your motivation may be to generate profit, but the only way you're going to be able to generate profit is by having something that adds value to someone else's life. And this is the foundational tenet. This idea is why the founders diffused power in our nation. And isn't it amazing that in a system where power is diffused is set, the stage is set. The stage to have one of the youngest nations in the world to ascend to global preeminence and dominance. Not because Americans aren't inherently better than anybody else. We are all made in the image of God. All humans are made in the image of God. It's not because we're inherently smarter than anybody else. I'm proud to be an American just like everybody else. But let me just tell you plainly. Americans are not intrinsically and innately smarter than anybody else. What has happened? An environment of freedom has been established in our nation. And that freedom is based on a healthy distrust of human nature. Guys. That is the foundational truth. And when I say that distrust, it is that in order for an Amazon, for example, to come to flourish is because people use their Amazon products. Use the. Use Amazon to buy and sell products. Now, I understand there's corruption, there's sin in no matter what system that exists. But the question is, which system takes into consideration the reality of human nature and which system is working against human nature? Going back to the Donahue Friedman debate, when Milton Friedman. Friedman retorted to Phil Donahue. Oh, so you think there's no greed in China? No, no, no. No greed in in Russia. No greed in North Korea, certainly no greed in Cuba. Come on, man, that's foolish talk. Which system of mankind interacting with each other takes into consideration the realities of human nature. There is where you will find freedom and the reason why. Ain't no Silicon Valley in North Korea. And that's why to this day, the Chinese, at best, steal what we create in the United States of America. Because it is an environment of freedom that allows the reality of the full features of the imago DEI to flourish. Flourishing in a capitalistic system requires you to be a benefit to your neighbor.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: A discipleship minute with Joseph Parker.
>> Joseph Parker: We live in a crazy, dangerous world that includes spiritual warfare raging everywhere you go. We who are followers of Christ need to be warrior minded in our approach to how we follow and live for Christ in this dangerous world. Not being alert, making unwise decisions, moving without a sense of urgency. Any and all of these actions in wartime can literally cause someone to get killed.
Are you making it a priority to pray Psalm 91 every single day
Psalm 91 is a unique weapon in scripture that addresses many of the perils in life. Are you making it a priority to pray Psalm 91 every single day? If not, why not? Well, I'm not a fanatic and I don't see a need to pray this particular scripture in every single day. Well, if that is you, I believe you'd be wise to change your mind and to begin to pray this prayer every day. No one or nothing can protect you like God can.
>> Kevin Freeman: Here's a ten dollar bill. It's got the picture of Alexander Hamilton on the front of it. You know, it's kind of sad. When I was 10 years old, everything that I could buy for a dollar now costs about $10. That's the cost of inflation. It's just paper. It's not backed by anything. You can't exchange it for gold and silver. It used to, but you can't do that anymore and that's unfortunate. You know, pirates wouldn't accept this. Pirates. They wanted gold and silver patriots. The founders of this nation also wanted gold and silver coin. In fact, they put a provision in the Constitution, 17 words, that said states could only make gold and silver coins tender within the states. That's why I wrote this new book, Pirate Money Discovering the Founders Hidden Plan for Economic justice and Defeating the Great Reset. It will explain exactly the history of money and exactly why gold and silver coins can be made modern with new technology and a useful m. Monetary system. PirateMoneyBook.com.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: shining light into the dark. This is the Hamilton Corner on American Family Radio.
Every dollar that you give to my reelection campaign is matched by the city
>> Abraham Hamilton III: Welcome back to the Hamilton Corner. Abraham Hamilton III here. And I saw something as I was preparing for the show and I thought, surely this can't be right. but as you realize that, yeah, yeah, this is right. And I, I listened and I watched and I said, this is exactly how the noose of corruption, wraps itself around societies and never let go. Like when you think about when I share things like in my hometown of NewSong Orleans, Louisiana, and how it's been nothing but Democrat mayors for well over a century in the cities like that, all over the country. And you wonder how these things happen. what I'm about to share with you is an example of how it happens. Now, I'm not saying LA has had Democrat mayors for well over a century. but it's been one of the primary reasons why California, or primary contributor to California being a staunchly regressive, state for you know, quite some time now. And I'm talking about Los Angeles's mayor Karen Bass. And she, she put something on social media and my, my, my attorney Spidey senses immediately went off because what she put on social media was that hey, donate to my campaign because thanks to Los Angeles super matching program. And I know we got some Californians listening to the show right now, even some in la. You gonna like this, Bobby. Due to, due to LA super matching program, every dollar that you give to my reelection campaign will be matched by the city six to one. By the taxpayers. By the taxpayers in Los Angeles six to one. You get $5. It becomes, it becomes $35. And I was like what the taxpayers money? So what kind of, what kind of scheme are you selling out here, Karen? What kind of scheme? I mean I know you're trained in the ways of Marxism, but what's going on here? Sure enough, she did not make that up. Listen to and watch clip number seven. Clip seven, go.
>> Jeff McIntosh: Your donation to our campaign is more critical right now than ever before. Let me explain. Thanks to LA's Supermatch program, every qualified donation from Los Angeles residents is matched six to one by the city. But after the primary we had to start over from scratch. So we need you to rush your matching donation right now to help fuel this campaign. Chip in $5 right now and the city turns it into 35. Chip in $25 right now and the city turns it Into $175. Make your matching donation today. Thank you so much.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: Cole, you stupid. Now who you directing that towards, Bobby? Is it at Karen Bass or you directed at the taxpayers in Los Angeles? Bobby said all three of y'. All, all three of y'.
>> : All.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: Is you finish? Is you done? Oh my God. So, so she is advertising the super matching program in Los Angeles. As I explained, that allows. Guys, this is, this is wild. I mean we're learning all kind of stuff. I mean you got the vouching system in Minnesota to where you don't have to be registered to vote yourself. Nah, nah, nah, nah. You just go come will show up with a registered voter and the registered voter will vouch for up to eight other non registered voters that they live where they say that they live. And the one registered voter, you are the id. I remember that video right last week. That was wild. When I Saw that. I thought no way. I, look under the hood. Yes way. I see this. In Los Angeles, I think no way. Pop the hood. Yes way. So Los Angeles does have a super matching program that allows donors to. when I explain to you the rationale as to how some people got this pass in Los Angeles, y' all gonna. I can tell you now, Bobby's gonna play cold. Once again, there is a supermatching program that allows donors in Los Angeles. They have to be residents of Los Angeles who are giving money to candidates for office in Los Angeles. There is a minimum threshold of amount of money needed that the candidate must have in their election coffers in order to qualify to receive the funds. and it also includes a requirement that the candidates have received 100 separate donations of $115 or more, then they can become eligible to receive matching funds. And so, just to make sure I'm unmistakably clear, the donor, Jon Doe Sally Jenkins, gives $5 to a candidate in Los Angeles. The city of Los Angeles then will match that $5 with six times that donation to go to the candidate. Now, this is a part of the Los Angeles campaign financing system that was initially passed in 1990. Okay. Initially it was passed in 1990. The city council then. I'm, telling you guys, I. That's right, Sister Murray, you cannot make this stuff up. The city council then. That's right, Vic. Vicki says no money for potholes, but we got money for politicians. Vicki, stop confusing me with facts. Oh, man, where was I?
>> Joseph Parker: La.
>> Kevin Freeman: La.
>> : Not.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: Does not currently have a budget surplus. Oh, yeah, yeah, L.A. does not currently have a budget surplus. But yes, yes, L.A. as a city is hundreds of millions in the hole. However, they got money for candidates running for office, though.
Bobby Bass: City council expanded matching program for mayoral and council elections
Bobby, let me ask you this question. With LA's budget, deficit, do you think they're going to refrain from spending money on this matching program for their elected officials or. And reallocate those funds to, you know, municipal priorities? Or do you think they're going to prioritize the election efforts of the seven times. Six to one. You say six to one. Six to one, yeah. So what I was back to explaining. So the, the campaign finance system was. Was passed originally In M. The 90s as a result, and this is to Bobby's point, earlier, as a result of the citizens voting for it, the citizens voted to pass the campaign financing system that when it was originally passed, it was a one to one matching program that the city of Los Angeles, through its collection of taxpayer money. I, Want to emphasize this, they would match donations made to candidates who made the. Who qualify for the matching program. Right. Now, it applies to the mayoral candidates and the city council in Los Angeles. Right, but y' all know what happened. I'll, I'll ask you all. You all rhetorically. Bob, you included in this, too. When a government program has given out money starts, does it usually end up where it started? just asking for a friend. In this case, the friend is me. The government program starts and is giving out money, does it usually stay where it starts? Well, what happened in Los Angeles? Well, the city council voted, now remember, the matching program applies to the mayor's office, candidate for mayor, and the candidates for the city council. Guess who expanded it from one to one to six to one? The city council. The city council expanded it to allow the matching funds to go from a, one to one match, not the one to one is problematic. If you ask me. If a private citizen wants to support a candidate for office to donate to their campaigns, why does other taxpayers need to be compelled to do so? Yeah, yeah, the people that said we need to get dirty money out of politics, right? Yeah, ain't no dirty money there. Well, this was the reasoning that they used, Bobby. They got the Angelenos to vote for this. Originally, the argument was that we need to nullify the impact of big moneyed interests and make sure the little man has just as much impact on politics as the big moneyed interest. So the way we're going to do so, it has a system that six to one it matches. Guys, if you ever wondered, man, how does this stuff keep happening in Los Angeles? Here's an indication, and then just zoom out. This clearly is a system that favors incumbents because you think an upstart candidate is going to have the same ability to get $115 donations from 100 different people in order to qualify. It don't matter how much money. They could have one big donor. But if you don't have 100 different donations of over $115, then you can't qualify for the matching money. Guys, this is just insane. This is additional insanity. That's why living locally is so important. Living locally. We probably have some people listening right now who live in Los Angeles who didn't know what I just told you. And I'm not saying this because I'm like, yeah, that's ignorance. No, I'm saying these are the kind of things that get buried and hidden. And you want, how come these incumbents keep having so much money then you also get the revelation from Karen Bass's infomercial that the primary election, which Los Angeles had an open primary when she had to go against Spencer Pratt, it drained some of her electoral resources, she said. So now we got to start over. We have to raise more money. So get your five bucks in so it can be matched six to one, guys. That's how this stuff happens. So when you have, you know, protracted one party rule in Los Angeles as it has been, you know, these are the kind of things that happen. So you give your donation, you give your donation, and the taxpayers money will match it six to one. how could that be deemed? Listen, I think an enterprising Angeleno should challenge that campaign financing system, arguing that how can my tax money be reappropriated to support a candidate who I don't support? it's not, is not ethical. And I would argue with an appropriate challenge, it may not survive constitutional scrutiny. Because imagine you're a Los Angeles citizen, right? Let's say hypothetically, in the wide, wide world of possibilities, that you have a person who supports Republican candidates who lives in Los Angeles and they don't want to support Karen Bass election, reelection campaign. But because another Angeleno gives $5 to Karen Bass, then the pool of municipal money, that includes the money paid, let's say, I don't know, local property tax, local municipal taxes paid by the Republican citizen of Los Angeles. Now their money is being utilized to support a mayoral candidate who they do not support. I, I, I, I smell m a lawsuit. But guys, this is how these things happen. This is how these things happen. That's right. Law. Scandalous. That's a good one, guys. That's a scam. That's a scam. How many people in Los Angeles have their tax dollars going to support candidates who they don't support? Wow, that, that's just wild, man. That's just wild.
Jesse Waters interviewed Abdul Al Said about his support for Sharia law
Well, I was interested in this because last night, Abdul Al Al Said, the Democrat candidate for the U.S. senate in Michigan, who by the way, was supported by Hassan Piker. They're fast friends, you know, even though now, now it's general election time, Al Said is trying to distance himself from Hasan Piker. Isn't that interesting? When it's primary time, they doing the cabbage patch, you know, they doing it all, they reeboking together, you know, hola, hola. You know, they all in it, you know, but now it's general election time and now it's a little bit more distance. I wonder why that happens, huh? And who was also and the Council for American Islamic Relations CARE bragged about how their money is what got Abdul Al Said to win the Democrat nomination. You know care that unindicted co conspirator for the Holy Land foundation trial who supports Hamas. You know them and their C4 by the way care action which started the primary super PAC supporting Muslim candidates for office nationwide. Yeah, yeah. Them. While Syed was on was interview interviewed by Jesse Waters last night. And it was very interesting and I don't know if I have enough time for. I guess I'll set it up. How much time I have left in this segment. Let's see. Disrespectful clock. I see it. I don't have time for it but I'll set it up because one of the things I was interested to see is whether or not Jesse Waters would press Al Said on his public expressed support for Sharia law. I want everybody to understand what I'm saying when I and I know I've been on this and I'm going to be on it because I think an alarm and an attention has to be brought to this. Sharia law is not compatible with the United States of America's Constitution. It is not compatible. Sharia compliance is fundamentally at odds with U.S. constitutional governance. Okay, when people say oh, Sharia only applies to personal private religious commitment, guys, that is not true. That is not true. It has civic and socio political imperatives that devout adherents are required to embrace. And Al Said who was a who is a doctor in 2022 expressed publicly his support for Sharia law and said basically that opposition to Sharia law really is just steeped in white supremacy. If you read Hadees, one might argue that Sharia is actually white Mohammedan supremacy. But let's not get bogged down with those details. Jesse Waters asking some questions about that. We'll get into it when we come back from the break.
AFA action takes attacks on the family seriously. Your gift to AFA action helps fight back
>> : AFA action takes attacks on the family seriously. The enemies of the family constantly employ new tactics to try to sneak past our radar. They know if we stand together, their evil plans will fail. Your gift to AFA action allows us to stay vigilant against their onslaught. And if you give this month M you'll receive access to the Cultural Institute video When youn Faith is Illegal by Frank harbor on AFA Stream as our thanks you can make your gift [email protected]
>> Abraham Hamilton III: Jesus told us to go into all the world and make disciples. American Family Radio is following that great commission everywhere our network reaches. You can help by becoming a Great Commission Partner. Not only will you be helping to fund our efforts, but you'll also gain access to everything published on stream.aca.net there you'll find educational materials, documentaries and video versions of AFR programs. Learn more and become a Great commission [email protected]
>> Joseph Parker: the war on Reality this is David Wheaton, host of the Christian Worldview. It was almost one year ago that 31 year old Christian and conservative leader Charlie Kirk walked into an outdoor amphitheater at Utah Valley University to hold a question and answer event with thousands of college students. Minutes later, a young man named Tyler Robinson fatally shot Charlie from a rooftop sniper position. Robinson was a leftist romantically involved with a gender confused man. He couldn't handle the truth. Charlie put Jesus said to his father, your word is truth. This is what the War on Reality is about. Hear a most recent program with Frank Turek, mentor to Charlie Kirk and author of the War on reality@ah, thechristianworldview.org and then join us this weekend for another program that will sharpen your worldview.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: Listen to the Christian Worldview with David
>> : Wheaton Saturday mornings at 8 Central on American Family Radio.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: Hi, I'm Jan Harper. If you're a pastor's wife, you know both the blessings and the unique challenges that come with the life you and your husband live daily. We call it Living in the Fishbowl.
>> : Details have been announced for the 2026 pastors and wives Fishbowl Retreat. Once again, this year's retreat will be at Pickwick Landing State park in Counts, Tennessee. From October 20th through the 22nd, pastors and their wives will enjoy rest, renewal and fellowship hosted by Pastor Bert Harper, Director of Marriage, Family and pastoral ministries at AFA and co host of Exploring the Word on AFR and his wife Jan. Our special speaker will be J.J. jasper of AFR. Your registration fee covers lodging, meals and materials. All you need to do is get there. The annual AFA Pastors and wives fishbowl retreat October 20th through 22nd. Learn more and register at repairingthefoundations.net we'd
>> Abraham Hamilton III: love to see you there.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: The Hamilton Corner podcast and one minute commentaries are available at afr.net back to the Hamilton Corner on American Family Radio.
Welcome back to the Hamilton Corner. Man. This is wild. Man. This is wild
>> Abraham Hamilton III: Welcome back to the Hamilton Corner.
>> Joseph Parker: Man.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: Man.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: Man. yeah, this is wild.
>> Joseph Parker: Man.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: This, this, this kind of stuff is wild. This is wild.
Al Syed said getting rid of Sharia law was white supremacy
So back to Al said. So he said what he said. And in the clip I'm going to play, you're going to get a little bit of Syed saying what he said about sharia law in 2022, and then a little bit of the conversation between he and Jesse Waters from last night. Listen to and watch clip number eight. Clip number eight. Go.
>> Jesse Watters: Let's move on. You said getting rid of Sharia law was white supremacy. Let's roll the tape. Go. I don't have to tell you that the same exact forces that drove native peoples from their land two centuries ago destroyed black Wallnua Street a, century ago, bombed a building decades ago, and tried to ban Sharia law not a decade ago, that those forces are alive and well today. So getting rid of Sharia law's white supremacy. Can you explain that one? Do you know what canon law is, Jesse? I assume you're Christian, right? Yeah, tell me. All right, so canon law is the name for Christian law. I don't begrudge you your right to practice your faith as you choose. I don't know why the idea that I could practice my faith as I choose is a problem. Nobody is trying to push Sharia law on anyone else, just like I hope nobody is trying to push canon law on anybody else because we live in an America where you should have the freedom of your religion. So the idea that you have somebody like Tommy Tuberville, right, who, you know, barely was good at coaching football, is out here trying to ban Sharia law when there's less than 1% of the Muslim community in America, as if somehow Muslims are out here trying to push Sharia law. That seems to me to be deliberately targeting the Muslim community because they're different. And I'm m just saying that, like, I don't. I have no issue with people practicing their faith. In fact, I would never want somebody to push their faith on me, and I would never want to push my faith on somebody else. good, because no one wants you to get rid of your religion. And so the idea. No one wants that. So. But when people start. When people preemptively go out there, start preemptively passing laws to ban something that's not happening, what you're trying to do is target a very small community because they're different. And this operates. I mean, look, I'm just going to say there's statistical evidence that the person is kind of scary. Simply, people don't mind that. You know, it's like mental women. It's like physical punishment. Say the word. Look, Jesse, Jesse, People don't like to say Michigan. I'm just saying I don't think that's a good position. Scary. Nobody's pushing it.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: Oh, where do I Begin. Well, let me say a couple things. First, it really, really bothers me when you have people like Al Syed. I don't know what he knows or what he doesn't know. First of all, it wasn't one black Wall street in America. People like to point to Greenwood and Tulsa because they don't like to talk about all the other black Wall streets in America. Because in Tulsa that's the only place where you can point to a physical altercation that was involved where skin shade played a role. What happened to all other black Wall street, you know, Rosewood, Florida and parts of Mississippi and in Tennessee. And nobody ever discusses those. You want to know why? Because none of them came to a conclusion because of anything having to do with violent skin color based altercations. Everything that happened there happened because of regressive policies ultimately that sought to crush more melanated people under the boot of progressivism. But they don't want that story told. That's why there's a singular reference to black Wallnua Street. But anyway, I digress from that. this guy, man, oh man, oh man. This is why we need to have these conversations. First of all, to say opposition to Sharia law is steeped in so called white supremacy denies the fact that Islam is not in ethnicity. Islam is not limited to any particular skin shade. Okay? You have Chechnyan Muslims, you have Bosnian Muslims. We as American citizens have to develop the resolve to say to those who would make the ignorant and intentionally provocative, accusation that ethnicity is what's driving any concern about Sharia is just a flat lie. And you don't allow that to get any traction in your head or in your heart, that you don't have any hesitations. You know, you don't sound like Mike Pence when he's asked about the worker who is confused about their identity and sexuality. Right? You don't have to hum and hum and hum and hum. You say, man, get out of here with that foolishness. This has nothing to do with any type of ethnic supremacy. This has everything to do with constitutional liberty. And let's be real, Sharia is not compatible with the US Constitution. And Sharia, ain't compatible with Christianity. That's why in Dearborn, Michigan you had the mayor telling the Christian who lived there that you are not welcome here. Remember that. Remember that. Remember that you are not welcome here. Remember that.
Al Said makes claim that Sharia law is similar to canon law
Next, watch the sleight of hand. So Al Said tries to make an assertion that Sharia is similar to canon law. And leave it aside. Leave aside that canon law applies, To Catholics. You don't have, like, Protestant canon law, you know what I mean? But leave that aside for them for a moment, Elsayed assumes. And let me zoom out a little bit more. Why would Elsaya, take an interview to go on Fox News? Why would he do that? Because he's attempting to do the exact same thing that he's trying to do by distancing himself now from Hasan Piker. He's attempting to make himself palatable to moderates, to appear as if, you know, you know, can't we all just get along? We could Rodney King this thing. They're trying to paint me at this. They're trying to say, I'm over here running around, you know, Muju Hadin in it all to death. I'm just like you folks, trying to appeal to moderate voters. That's why he took the interview. So he's going to try to get his big red rubber ball out and play dodgeball as much as possible around the hot issues. And to present himself as this. He's just a normal race, regular, you know, middle of the country kind of guy, which he's not, all right? He's not. His affiliations tell you that. His financial sources tell you that. His past representations tell you that. His current representations tell you that although he's not going to stick by many of them on Fox News, Canon law applies ecclesiologically only to church polity. And here's the big one. None of Canada law says, and by the way, you don't adhere to US Constitutional liberty and constitutional norms, whereas Sharia law does the exact opposite. All right? Sharia law. And you don't have to take my word for it, there are countries right now where Sharia law governs. How do women dress in Sharia compliant nations are, constitutional liberties embraced in Sharia compliant nations. So you can play this game if you want, but I'll say, Ed. Ah, let's just keep it a buck, man. You are lying. You are lying. And then he's lying when he says. And no one's trying to force their Sharia compliance on you in America. well, say it, my man. You want to tell me why there's a fake Council of North America when you, you want to, you want to suspend that to me? My. You want to talk to me about these, man, why you gotta have a fee council, Mike? What is it about? My what? It's the Sharia Council of North America.
>> Jeff McIntosh: Guys.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: I know you're not. You're working so hard not to impose Sharia on anybody Else that there wouldn't be things that happen, you know, like, renting a water park and saying, this is a Muslim only gathering at this water park. That wouldn't happen. That wouldn't happen. Right, because you're not trying to impose Sharia on anybody. Right. And we have this other thing, you know, it's called history. How does it usually work? Because he mentioned, you know, Muslims are only, comprise only 1% of the American population. We're not a threat to you guys. Nobody. We're just. Sharia only applies to us in our private exercise of our religion. Right. Kind of like Muhammad had his private exercise of his religion in Medina, like that, until he became empowered. And he. And the empowerment allows freedom and allow for it. Let me ask you this. In Sharia compliance societies, can you draw pictures of Muhammad? Guys, I'm sharing this with you. And I've shared the shows we've done with Bill Federer, the shows we've done, describing the history, the shows we've done, articulating the expansion. What I would call Islamic colonization did not occur through, the free exercise of religion and freedom of the ballot box and the freedom of speech. That's not how it happened, guys. It's not. It's not. The same old rhythm and rhyme has transpired that when Islam is not a dominant influence, it appeals to be a docile cohabitative phenomenon until it expands. Remember what Eddie Issa said. I played the audio for you from the city council meeting in McKinney, Texas. When Eddie Issa, who explained, who described himself as a survivor of Sharia law in Iran, that's how he described himself. And he explained that when. When Islam is of less of an influence, the doctrine of Takia is perfectly allowable. Perfectly allowable. Now that's a great question to Merrill M. Asked, why wouldn't Jesse prepare to respond with simple responses like that? I have my own opinions about Fox News. You know, I think, you know, Fox News is interested. They want to try to be, how shall I say, say this? squeamish. Well, yeah, ratings oriented. But they don't want to seem as if, you know, they're bigoted. You know, I would just say the truth is not bigotry. The truth is not bigotry. And maybe he doesn't know the history. I don't know. But the rinse and repeat that we've seen in history from Islam is that going along to get along only occurs when you have minimal influence. And the minimal influence allows other things like lying and other things to be done in service of Islam. Did I mention CAIR is the same organization that the documents were found when CAIR said that they plan to use America's legal system against America to allow Islam to become dominant in the United States of America? Did I mention that? Guys, I'm sharing this with you because I want you to be prepared to respond to these things and to, understand that you're not being bigoted by expressing your concern. And it's the responsibility. The burden of proof, if you will, is on those who are saying, yes, we're compatible with constitutional liberties. I ain't from Missouri, but you got to show me.
M. Bennett: Muslim Brotherhood is the creation of the Muslim Brotherhood
You've got to show me. Then you have. And I'm not going to play this clip. I have it. But, That's right. And care is the creation of the Muslim Brotherhood whose objective is to accomplish. We seem to always come back here what the Ottoman Turks ought to accomplish. Had another clip I was going to show you where, Jesse Waters asked Al said about his support for sex, change operations on children. And in a very weird way, the conversation devolves into El Said asking Jesse Waters on live television if he's circumcised. Like, this is weird, man. What are you. What are you. What are you talking about? Trying to say it's the same type of thing. No, it's not. No, it's not. When you are trying to mutilate children's bodies in an effort to confirm a social, political phenomenon, one of these things is not like the other. We have, a, clear responsibility, guys, to understand the lessons taught from scripture, the lessons from history. This is why I spent the extensive amount of time I did with you sharing about the Barbary wars, which, unfortunately, our children are not taught in school. But the first war fought by the United States of America following our war for independence against Great Britain was a war against Islamic supremacists. Guys, that's just facts. So why don't we know about it? M. Because there are some people who have a vested interest in keeping truth concealed so that those of us who are ignorant end up becoming victimized as a result of that ignorance. But we don't have to go along with it. And this is why the insidious nature of these things need to be exposed. From the six to one donations in Los Angeles all the way to the Taqiyah doctrine to allow for Islamic supremacy. The views and opinions expressed in this broadcast may not necessarily reflect those of the American Family association or American Family Radio.
Hamilton: God has called us to be ambassadors even in this dark moment
>> Abraham Hamilton III: Darkness is not an affirmative force. It simply reoccupies the space vacated by the light.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: This is the, Hamilton Corner on American Family Radio.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: It should be uncomfortable for a believer to live as a hypocrite, delivering people
>> Abraham Hamilton III: out of the bondage of mainstream media and the philosophies of this world.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: God has called you and me to be his ambassadors even in this dark moment. Let's not miss our moment.
Welcome to the Hamilton Corner. Abraham Hamilton III is my name
>> Abraham Hamilton III: And now the, Hamilton Corner.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: Good evening everybody. Welcome to the Hamilton Corner. Abraham Hamilton III is my name. Delighted to be with you yet again, joined by the Corner contingent right across from me, my man, 100 grand, Mr. Bobby, who had a nice dose of half of the Hamiltonian six pack yesterday. He survived to tell about it. That's my children, by the way. Y' all know I have six children? Yeah. Okay. All right. And the screening room produce extraordinaire. Often imitated, never duplicated. The real J. Mack, ladies and gentlemen, m Mr. Jeff McIntosh. And some of y' all may be wondering why I say J. Mac, the real J. Mac. Because I kind of noticed ever since I've been calling out J. Mac, I see all these different programs, they want to have a J. Mac. All of a sudden I was like, what is going on here? Often imitated, but never duplicated. You know what I'm saying? Copiers.
Many of you are making your transition from part time jobs to full time jobs
Well, thank you for tuning in to the program at this very moment. Many of you, if not most of you, are making your transition from your part time jobs to your full time jobs. And I'm speaking to those listening live on the radio right now, those watching live on television, those who are streaming, however you're tuning into the program, we are grateful for you doing so. But as you are making your transition, most of you to your full time jobs, or if you've done it already or you're operating in reverse, we have some people doing that as well. Make, your transition with intentionality. Understanding the primacy that God places on family, we cannot allow the headlines, the things that are transpiring around us to get us to the place to where we become so, overwhelmed, so inundated to where we're lulled into a comfortable negligence. A comfortable negligence. We have to refuse to allow that to occur and welcome the King of Glory to grasp ahold of us personally. Never forget that God's desire for his people is that whatever we engage in, in terms of, external ministry engagements, and I mean sharing, with those beyond ourselves, the Lord's desire is for that to be the overflow of what we Enjoy with him personally. That has. It has to be that, reality. The Lord doesn't want us trying to pour out of empty vessels. He doesn't want us trying to sell what we have not purchased. This is why, when you see the shema in Deuteronomy 6, the first component of Cascading the love for the Lord begins with, you shall love the Lord with all your heart, all your strength, all your soul. You love the Lord with all you are. And once that is established, you teach that love for the Lord that you have diligently, that is God's manner, God's way for us. And that's why you have, wonderful texts like Taste and See that the Lord is good. You know, you have, you know, the woman who met Jesus at the well, she didn't intend to be, you know, hyper evangelist. Check out my card. Follow me on Instagram, face, you know, like, follow, subscribe. None of that. He's like, man, I met a man. And the Scripture says, man, she went, shared with a whole village. You know, that's how God intends for it to work. And the same is true with serving the Lord in our homes, man. We are simply sharing and anchoring our families around the thing that has grasped ahold of us. Like Philippians 3 says, I seek to apprehend that which has apprehended me. Glory to God. So as you're making your transition, man, do so with intentionality. Let the primacy that God places on your faithfulness in your home to govern and guide and guard how you engage in your home. If you're a husband like me, the first external responsibility we have for ministerial investment is our wives. If you're a wife, Listen, listening to the show. Your first responsibility ministerially is to your husband. That's first. That's first. And when I say that the result of you interacting with your spouse should be that you both are growing in the grace and the knowledge of our Lord Jesus Christ to where we're bearing more and more fruit, more and more fruit, becoming more and more like Jesus. Amen.
David Frum: Why do we have a separation of powers in America
Well, we're going to begin the program today in Jeremiah chapter 17, because this is the foundational notion that much of mankind, to date, including many of our fellow countrymen, are fumbling over. And this is where, the issue of divergence truly is. You know, I shared a couple weeks ago, if not. Yeah, it was a couple weeks ago, the late Justice Antonin Scalia explaining what makes our Constitution unique, what makes our form of government unique. And he explained, as powerful and necessary as a declaration of independence, is that our nation is not unique in terms of declaration, of rights like the Bill of Rights, even though obviously those rights are important, but other nations have bill of rights. He talked about how the Soviet, Union in Russia had a declaration of rights that exceeded our Bill of Rights. But what is the major difference? Justice Scalia explained it was a separation of powers. It was a refusal to allow a consolidation of power governmentally, a centralization of it. Well, when you dig a little bit deeper and study Madison's notes on the Constitution, you don't have to wonder, why in all of the civilizations and nations that have been founded in all of mankind's history, why was the United States of America the first nation to have such a diffusion of power? I mean, Justice Scalia even explained, even in the parliamentary system, that the proverbial executive is a feature of parliament, is a creature of Parliament. That's why you don't have any disagreement between, Parliament and the prime ministers, usually. And if the parliament doesn't like the prime ministers, what do they do? They get rid of the prime minister. But why do we have the separation of powers? You study James Madison's notes on the Constitution, you study the Federalist Papers, you study the debates concerning the constitutions, and they will turn you right to where we're going today. In Jeremiah, chapter 17, Jeremiah 17, verses 9 and 10, this is what the Scripture says. The heart is more deceitful than all else and is desperately sick. Or other translations might say, not might say, do say that the heart is desperately wicked. The heart is deceitful and desperately wicked. Who can know it? The NESB here says, who can understand it? Then verse 10 goes on to explain. I, the Lord, search the heart, I test the mind even to give to each man according to his ways, according to the results of his deeds. The major distinction that we're having, the arguments that. That that are. That are percolating in our nation, is they. They really are grounded in whether or not we believe that Jeremiah 17, verses 9 and 10 are true? Verse 9 in particular, when you consider the various worldviews and ideologies that persist in our society, they fundamentally come down to two considerations. Is it God's word that will prevail or man's word? One of the foundational tenets of man's word, which manifests itself in socialism and communism and all these other type of isms and schisms that don't have rhythm, is that a Marxist framework denies man's sinfulness. That's why you have this consistent push for human utopia void of submission to God. I saw a debate earlier, not a debate, I guess it was an interview, old interview between Phil Donahue and Milton Friedman, you know, and Phil Donahue was, he put on his deep concern and compassionate tone of voice and said, you know, Mr. Friedman, when I survey what has transpired under our capitalist society and you see so many instances of greed and abuse, that doesn't it make you wonder and whether or not capitalism is something that we should embrace. To which Milton Friedman responded, said, you think greed is limited to capitalistic framework. So you think there's no greed in Russia, there's no greed in China, there's no greed in China. The reason why the capitalistic framework works better than any of these other systems is because it doesn't deny man's sinfulness. It's the best, not perfect, but the best system at understanding man's sinfulness, in
>> Kevin Freeman: using
>> Abraham Hamilton III: the reality of man's sinfulness to force man to be a benefit to his neighbor. That the only way that you can succeed in a capitalistic system is if you produce something that will benefit your neighbor. If you come up with an invention and it doesn't help anybody's lives get better, it doesn't help anybody do tasks better, it doesn't accomplish anything to benefit someone beyond yourself, then you will not have a, marketable business commodity. You will at best have a hobby within the capitalistic framework. You see, James Madison said this in Federalist 51, quote, it may be a reflection on human nature that such devices, checks and balances should be necessary to control the abuses of government. But what is government itself but the greatest of all reflections on human nature? If men were angels, no government would be necessary. If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary. Guys, that's what it boils down to. That's what it all boils down to. The heart truly is the heart of the matter. And if we reject, let me say it differently, if we deny and reject the biblical truth about mankind's sinful nature, we will suffer the consequences of that rejection. We'll suffer the consequences of that rejection. You know, this is not to sanitize or to aggrandize, a self, selfishness, a self centeredness. But it takes in considerations, takes into consideration the self interested disposition that mankind has and says, well, because this is the way that we are made in order for you to thrive in this system of interacting, because that's truly what it Is, you know, in, economics class, I teach the homeschoolers, I explain what is a market. A market is a place where goods and services are exchanged for remuneration. Well, when you come to market, in order for your offering to be beneficially exchanged, it has to be a benefit to someone else. Your motivation may be to generate profit, but the only way you're going to be able to generate profit is by having something that adds value to someone else's life. And this is the foundational tenet. This idea is why the founders diffused power in our nation. And isn't it amazing that in a system where power is diffused is set, the stage is set. The stage to have one of the youngest nations in the world to ascend to global preeminence and dominance. Not because Americans aren't inherently better than anybody else. We are all made in the image of God. All humans are made in the image of God. It's not because we're inherently smarter than anybody else. I'm proud to be an American just like everybody else. But let me just tell you plainly. Americans are not intrinsically and innately smarter than anybody else. What has happened? An environment of freedom has been established in our nation. And that freedom is based on a healthy distrust of human nature. Guys. That is the foundational truth. And when I say that distrust, it is that in order for an Amazon, for example, to come to flourish is because people use their Amazon products. Use the. Use Amazon to buy and sell products. Now, I understand there's corruption, there's sin in no matter what system that exists. But the question is, which system takes into consideration the reality of human nature and which system is working against human nature? Going back to the Donahue Friedman debate, when Milton Friedman. Friedman retorted to Phil Donahue. Oh, so you think there's no greed in China? No, no, no. No greed in in Russia. No greed in North Korea, certainly no greed in Cuba. Come on, man, that's foolish talk. Which system of mankind interacting with each other takes into consideration the realities of human nature. There is where you will find freedom and the reason why. Ain't no Silicon Valley in North Korea. And that's why to this day, the Chinese, at best, steal what we create in the United States of America. Because it is an environment of freedom that allows the reality of the full features of the imago DEI to flourish. Flourishing in a capitalistic system requires you to be a benefit to your neighbor.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: A discipleship minute with Joseph Parker.
>> Joseph Parker: We live in a crazy, dangerous world that includes spiritual warfare raging everywhere you go. We who are followers of Christ need to be warrior minded in our approach to how we follow and live for Christ in this dangerous world. Not being alert, making unwise decisions, moving without a sense of urgency. Any and all of these actions in wartime can literally cause someone to get killed.
Are you making it a priority to pray Psalm 91 every single day
Psalm 91 is a unique weapon in scripture that addresses many of the perils in life. Are you making it a priority to pray Psalm 91 every single day? If not, why not? Well, I'm not a fanatic and I don't see a need to pray this particular scripture in every single day. Well, if that is you, I believe you'd be wise to change your mind and to begin to pray this prayer every day. No one or nothing can protect you like God can.
>> Kevin Freeman: Here's a ten dollar bill. It's got the picture of Alexander Hamilton on the front of it. You know, it's kind of sad. When I was 10 years old, everything that I could buy for a dollar now costs about $10. That's the cost of inflation. It's just paper. It's not backed by anything. You can't exchange it for gold and silver. It used to, but you can't do that anymore and that's unfortunate. You know, pirates wouldn't accept this. Pirates. They wanted gold and silver patriots. The founders of this nation also wanted gold and silver coin. In fact, they put a provision in the Constitution, 17 words, that said states could only make gold and silver coins tender within the states. That's why I wrote this new book, Pirate Money Discovering the Founders Hidden Plan for Economic justice and Defeating the Great Reset. It will explain exactly the history of money and exactly why gold and silver coins can be made modern with new technology and a useful m. Monetary system. PirateMoneyBook.com.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: shining light into the dark. This is the Hamilton Corner on American Family Radio.
Every dollar that you give to my reelection campaign is matched by the city
>> Abraham Hamilton III: Welcome back to the Hamilton Corner. Abraham Hamilton III here. And I saw something as I was preparing for the show and I thought, surely this can't be right. but as you realize that, yeah, yeah, this is right. And I, I listened and I watched and I said, this is exactly how the noose of corruption, wraps itself around societies and never let go. Like when you think about when I share things like in my hometown of NewSong Orleans, Louisiana, and how it's been nothing but Democrat mayors for well over a century in the cities like that, all over the country. And you wonder how these things happen. what I'm about to share with you is an example of how it happens. Now, I'm not saying LA has had Democrat mayors for well over a century. but it's been one of the primary reasons why California, or primary contributor to California being a staunchly regressive, state for you know, quite some time now. And I'm talking about Los Angeles's mayor Karen Bass. And she, she put something on social media and my, my, my attorney Spidey senses immediately went off because what she put on social media was that hey, donate to my campaign because thanks to Los Angeles super matching program. And I know we got some Californians listening to the show right now, even some in la. You gonna like this, Bobby. Due to, due to LA super matching program, every dollar that you give to my reelection campaign will be matched by the city six to one. By the taxpayers. By the taxpayers in Los Angeles six to one. You get $5. It becomes, it becomes $35. And I was like what the taxpayers money? So what kind of, what kind of scheme are you selling out here, Karen? What kind of scheme? I mean I know you're trained in the ways of Marxism, but what's going on here? Sure enough, she did not make that up. Listen to and watch clip number seven. Clip seven, go.
>> Jeff McIntosh: Your donation to our campaign is more critical right now than ever before. Let me explain. Thanks to LA's Supermatch program, every qualified donation from Los Angeles residents is matched six to one by the city. But after the primary we had to start over from scratch. So we need you to rush your matching donation right now to help fuel this campaign. Chip in $5 right now and the city turns it into 35. Chip in $25 right now and the city turns it Into $175. Make your matching donation today. Thank you so much.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: Cole, you stupid. Now who you directing that towards, Bobby? Is it at Karen Bass or you directed at the taxpayers in Los Angeles? Bobby said all three of y'. All, all three of y'.
>> : All.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: Is you finish? Is you done? Oh my God. So, so she is advertising the super matching program in Los Angeles. As I explained, that allows. Guys, this is, this is wild. I mean we're learning all kind of stuff. I mean you got the vouching system in Minnesota to where you don't have to be registered to vote yourself. Nah, nah, nah, nah. You just go come will show up with a registered voter and the registered voter will vouch for up to eight other non registered voters that they live where they say that they live. And the one registered voter, you are the id. I remember that video right last week. That was wild. When I Saw that. I thought no way. I, look under the hood. Yes way. I see this. In Los Angeles, I think no way. Pop the hood. Yes way. So Los Angeles does have a super matching program that allows donors to. when I explain to you the rationale as to how some people got this pass in Los Angeles, y' all gonna. I can tell you now, Bobby's gonna play cold. Once again, there is a supermatching program that allows donors in Los Angeles. They have to be residents of Los Angeles who are giving money to candidates for office in Los Angeles. There is a minimum threshold of amount of money needed that the candidate must have in their election coffers in order to qualify to receive the funds. and it also includes a requirement that the candidates have received 100 separate donations of $115 or more, then they can become eligible to receive matching funds. And so, just to make sure I'm unmistakably clear, the donor, Jon Doe Sally Jenkins, gives $5 to a candidate in Los Angeles. The city of Los Angeles then will match that $5 with six times that donation to go to the candidate. Now, this is a part of the Los Angeles campaign financing system that was initially passed in 1990. Okay. Initially it was passed in 1990. The city council then. I'm, telling you guys, I. That's right, Sister Murray, you cannot make this stuff up. The city council then. That's right, Vic. Vicki says no money for potholes, but we got money for politicians. Vicki, stop confusing me with facts. Oh, man, where was I?
>> Joseph Parker: La.
>> Kevin Freeman: La.
>> : Not.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: Does not currently have a budget surplus. Oh, yeah, yeah, L.A. does not currently have a budget surplus. But yes, yes, L.A. as a city is hundreds of millions in the hole. However, they got money for candidates running for office, though.
Bobby Bass: City council expanded matching program for mayoral and council elections
Bobby, let me ask you this question. With LA's budget, deficit, do you think they're going to refrain from spending money on this matching program for their elected officials or. And reallocate those funds to, you know, municipal priorities? Or do you think they're going to prioritize the election efforts of the seven times. Six to one. You say six to one. Six to one, yeah. So what I was back to explaining. So the, the campaign finance system was. Was passed originally In M. The 90s as a result, and this is to Bobby's point, earlier, as a result of the citizens voting for it, the citizens voted to pass the campaign financing system that when it was originally passed, it was a one to one matching program that the city of Los Angeles, through its collection of taxpayer money. I, Want to emphasize this, they would match donations made to candidates who made the. Who qualify for the matching program. Right. Now, it applies to the mayoral candidates and the city council in Los Angeles. Right, but y' all know what happened. I'll, I'll ask you all. You all rhetorically. Bob, you included in this, too. When a government program has given out money starts, does it usually end up where it started? just asking for a friend. In this case, the friend is me. The government program starts and is giving out money, does it usually stay where it starts? Well, what happened in Los Angeles? Well, the city council voted, now remember, the matching program applies to the mayor's office, candidate for mayor, and the candidates for the city council. Guess who expanded it from one to one to six to one? The city council. The city council expanded it to allow the matching funds to go from a, one to one match, not the one to one is problematic. If you ask me. If a private citizen wants to support a candidate for office to donate to their campaigns, why does other taxpayers need to be compelled to do so? Yeah, yeah, the people that said we need to get dirty money out of politics, right? Yeah, ain't no dirty money there. Well, this was the reasoning that they used, Bobby. They got the Angelenos to vote for this. Originally, the argument was that we need to nullify the impact of big moneyed interests and make sure the little man has just as much impact on politics as the big moneyed interest. So the way we're going to do so, it has a system that six to one it matches. Guys, if you ever wondered, man, how does this stuff keep happening in Los Angeles? Here's an indication, and then just zoom out. This clearly is a system that favors incumbents because you think an upstart candidate is going to have the same ability to get $115 donations from 100 different people in order to qualify. It don't matter how much money. They could have one big donor. But if you don't have 100 different donations of over $115, then you can't qualify for the matching money. Guys, this is just insane. This is additional insanity. That's why living locally is so important. Living locally. We probably have some people listening right now who live in Los Angeles who didn't know what I just told you. And I'm not saying this because I'm like, yeah, that's ignorance. No, I'm saying these are the kind of things that get buried and hidden. And you want, how come these incumbents keep having so much money then you also get the revelation from Karen Bass's infomercial that the primary election, which Los Angeles had an open primary when she had to go against Spencer Pratt, it drained some of her electoral resources, she said. So now we got to start over. We have to raise more money. So get your five bucks in so it can be matched six to one, guys. That's how this stuff happens. So when you have, you know, protracted one party rule in Los Angeles as it has been, you know, these are the kind of things that happen. So you give your donation, you give your donation, and the taxpayers money will match it six to one. how could that be deemed? Listen, I think an enterprising Angeleno should challenge that campaign financing system, arguing that how can my tax money be reappropriated to support a candidate who I don't support? it's not, is not ethical. And I would argue with an appropriate challenge, it may not survive constitutional scrutiny. Because imagine you're a Los Angeles citizen, right? Let's say hypothetically, in the wide, wide world of possibilities, that you have a person who supports Republican candidates who lives in Los Angeles and they don't want to support Karen Bass election, reelection campaign. But because another Angeleno gives $5 to Karen Bass, then the pool of municipal money, that includes the money paid, let's say, I don't know, local property tax, local municipal taxes paid by the Republican citizen of Los Angeles. Now their money is being utilized to support a mayoral candidate who they do not support. I, I, I, I smell m a lawsuit. But guys, this is how these things happen. This is how these things happen. That's right. Law. Scandalous. That's a good one, guys. That's a scam. That's a scam. How many people in Los Angeles have their tax dollars going to support candidates who they don't support? Wow, that, that's just wild, man. That's just wild.
Jesse Waters interviewed Abdul Al Said about his support for Sharia law
Well, I was interested in this because last night, Abdul Al Al Said, the Democrat candidate for the U.S. senate in Michigan, who by the way, was supported by Hassan Piker. They're fast friends, you know, even though now, now it's general election time, Al Said is trying to distance himself from Hasan Piker. Isn't that interesting? When it's primary time, they doing the cabbage patch, you know, they doing it all, they reeboking together, you know, hola, hola. You know, they all in it, you know, but now it's general election time and now it's a little bit more distance. I wonder why that happens, huh? And who was also and the Council for American Islamic Relations CARE bragged about how their money is what got Abdul Al Said to win the Democrat nomination. You know care that unindicted co conspirator for the Holy Land foundation trial who supports Hamas. You know them and their C4 by the way care action which started the primary super PAC supporting Muslim candidates for office nationwide. Yeah, yeah. Them. While Syed was on was interview interviewed by Jesse Waters last night. And it was very interesting and I don't know if I have enough time for. I guess I'll set it up. How much time I have left in this segment. Let's see. Disrespectful clock. I see it. I don't have time for it but I'll set it up because one of the things I was interested to see is whether or not Jesse Waters would press Al Said on his public expressed support for Sharia law. I want everybody to understand what I'm saying when I and I know I've been on this and I'm going to be on it because I think an alarm and an attention has to be brought to this. Sharia law is not compatible with the United States of America's Constitution. It is not compatible. Sharia compliance is fundamentally at odds with U.S. constitutional governance. Okay, when people say oh, Sharia only applies to personal private religious commitment, guys, that is not true. That is not true. It has civic and socio political imperatives that devout adherents are required to embrace. And Al Said who was a who is a doctor in 2022 expressed publicly his support for Sharia law and said basically that opposition to Sharia law really is just steeped in white supremacy. If you read Hadees, one might argue that Sharia is actually white Mohammedan supremacy. But let's not get bogged down with those details. Jesse Waters asking some questions about that. We'll get into it when we come back from the break.
AFA action takes attacks on the family seriously. Your gift to AFA action helps fight back
>> : AFA action takes attacks on the family seriously. The enemies of the family constantly employ new tactics to try to sneak past our radar. They know if we stand together, their evil plans will fail. Your gift to AFA action allows us to stay vigilant against their onslaught. And if you give this month M you'll receive access to the Cultural Institute video When youn Faith is Illegal by Frank harbor on AFA Stream as our thanks you can make your gift [email protected]
>> Abraham Hamilton III: Jesus told us to go into all the world and make disciples. American Family Radio is following that great commission everywhere our network reaches. You can help by becoming a Great Commission Partner. Not only will you be helping to fund our efforts, but you'll also gain access to everything published on stream.aca.net there you'll find educational materials, documentaries and video versions of AFR programs. Learn more and become a Great commission [email protected]
>> Joseph Parker: the war on Reality this is David Wheaton, host of the Christian Worldview. It was almost one year ago that 31 year old Christian and conservative leader Charlie Kirk walked into an outdoor amphitheater at Utah Valley University to hold a question and answer event with thousands of college students. Minutes later, a young man named Tyler Robinson fatally shot Charlie from a rooftop sniper position. Robinson was a leftist romantically involved with a gender confused man. He couldn't handle the truth. Charlie put Jesus said to his father, your word is truth. This is what the War on Reality is about. Hear a most recent program with Frank Turek, mentor to Charlie Kirk and author of the War on reality@ah, thechristianworldview.org and then join us this weekend for another program that will sharpen your worldview.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: Listen to the Christian Worldview with David
>> : Wheaton Saturday mornings at 8 Central on American Family Radio.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: Hi, I'm Jan Harper. If you're a pastor's wife, you know both the blessings and the unique challenges that come with the life you and your husband live daily. We call it Living in the Fishbowl.
>> : Details have been announced for the 2026 pastors and wives Fishbowl Retreat. Once again, this year's retreat will be at Pickwick Landing State park in Counts, Tennessee. From October 20th through the 22nd, pastors and their wives will enjoy rest, renewal and fellowship hosted by Pastor Bert Harper, Director of Marriage, Family and pastoral ministries at AFA and co host of Exploring the Word on AFR and his wife Jan. Our special speaker will be J.J. jasper of AFR. Your registration fee covers lodging, meals and materials. All you need to do is get there. The annual AFA Pastors and wives fishbowl retreat October 20th through 22nd. Learn more and register at repairingthefoundations.net we'd
>> Abraham Hamilton III: love to see you there.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: The Hamilton Corner podcast and one minute commentaries are available at afr.net back to the Hamilton Corner on American Family Radio.
Welcome back to the Hamilton Corner. Man. This is wild. Man. This is wild
>> Abraham Hamilton III: Welcome back to the Hamilton Corner.
>> Joseph Parker: Man.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: Man.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: Man. yeah, this is wild.
>> Joseph Parker: Man.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: This, this, this kind of stuff is wild. This is wild.
Al Syed said getting rid of Sharia law was white supremacy
So back to Al said. So he said what he said. And in the clip I'm going to play, you're going to get a little bit of Syed saying what he said about sharia law in 2022, and then a little bit of the conversation between he and Jesse Waters from last night. Listen to and watch clip number eight. Clip number eight. Go.
>> Jesse Watters: Let's move on. You said getting rid of Sharia law was white supremacy. Let's roll the tape. Go. I don't have to tell you that the same exact forces that drove native peoples from their land two centuries ago destroyed black Wallnua Street a, century ago, bombed a building decades ago, and tried to ban Sharia law not a decade ago, that those forces are alive and well today. So getting rid of Sharia law's white supremacy. Can you explain that one? Do you know what canon law is, Jesse? I assume you're Christian, right? Yeah, tell me. All right, so canon law is the name for Christian law. I don't begrudge you your right to practice your faith as you choose. I don't know why the idea that I could practice my faith as I choose is a problem. Nobody is trying to push Sharia law on anyone else, just like I hope nobody is trying to push canon law on anybody else because we live in an America where you should have the freedom of your religion. So the idea that you have somebody like Tommy Tuberville, right, who, you know, barely was good at coaching football, is out here trying to ban Sharia law when there's less than 1% of the Muslim community in America, as if somehow Muslims are out here trying to push Sharia law. That seems to me to be deliberately targeting the Muslim community because they're different. And I'm m just saying that, like, I don't. I have no issue with people practicing their faith. In fact, I would never want somebody to push their faith on me, and I would never want to push my faith on somebody else. good, because no one wants you to get rid of your religion. And so the idea. No one wants that. So. But when people start. When people preemptively go out there, start preemptively passing laws to ban something that's not happening, what you're trying to do is target a very small community because they're different. And this operates. I mean, look, I'm just going to say there's statistical evidence that the person is kind of scary. Simply, people don't mind that. You know, it's like mental women. It's like physical punishment. Say the word. Look, Jesse, Jesse, People don't like to say Michigan. I'm just saying I don't think that's a good position. Scary. Nobody's pushing it.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: Oh, where do I Begin. Well, let me say a couple things. First, it really, really bothers me when you have people like Al Syed. I don't know what he knows or what he doesn't know. First of all, it wasn't one black Wall street in America. People like to point to Greenwood and Tulsa because they don't like to talk about all the other black Wall streets in America. Because in Tulsa that's the only place where you can point to a physical altercation that was involved where skin shade played a role. What happened to all other black Wall street, you know, Rosewood, Florida and parts of Mississippi and in Tennessee. And nobody ever discusses those. You want to know why? Because none of them came to a conclusion because of anything having to do with violent skin color based altercations. Everything that happened there happened because of regressive policies ultimately that sought to crush more melanated people under the boot of progressivism. But they don't want that story told. That's why there's a singular reference to black Wallnua Street. But anyway, I digress from that. this guy, man, oh man, oh man. This is why we need to have these conversations. First of all, to say opposition to Sharia law is steeped in so called white supremacy denies the fact that Islam is not in ethnicity. Islam is not limited to any particular skin shade. Okay? You have Chechnyan Muslims, you have Bosnian Muslims. We as American citizens have to develop the resolve to say to those who would make the ignorant and intentionally provocative, accusation that ethnicity is what's driving any concern about Sharia is just a flat lie. And you don't allow that to get any traction in your head or in your heart, that you don't have any hesitations. You know, you don't sound like Mike Pence when he's asked about the worker who is confused about their identity and sexuality. Right? You don't have to hum and hum and hum and hum. You say, man, get out of here with that foolishness. This has nothing to do with any type of ethnic supremacy. This has everything to do with constitutional liberty. And let's be real, Sharia is not compatible with the US Constitution. And Sharia, ain't compatible with Christianity. That's why in Dearborn, Michigan you had the mayor telling the Christian who lived there that you are not welcome here. Remember that. Remember that. Remember that you are not welcome here. Remember that.
Al Said makes claim that Sharia law is similar to canon law
Next, watch the sleight of hand. So Al Said tries to make an assertion that Sharia is similar to canon law. And leave it aside. Leave aside that canon law applies, To Catholics. You don't have, like, Protestant canon law, you know what I mean? But leave that aside for them for a moment, Elsayed assumes. And let me zoom out a little bit more. Why would Elsaya, take an interview to go on Fox News? Why would he do that? Because he's attempting to do the exact same thing that he's trying to do by distancing himself now from Hasan Piker. He's attempting to make himself palatable to moderates, to appear as if, you know, you know, can't we all just get along? We could Rodney King this thing. They're trying to paint me at this. They're trying to say, I'm over here running around, you know, Muju Hadin in it all to death. I'm just like you folks, trying to appeal to moderate voters. That's why he took the interview. So he's going to try to get his big red rubber ball out and play dodgeball as much as possible around the hot issues. And to present himself as this. He's just a normal race, regular, you know, middle of the country kind of guy, which he's not, all right? He's not. His affiliations tell you that. His financial sources tell you that. His past representations tell you that. His current representations tell you that although he's not going to stick by many of them on Fox News, Canon law applies ecclesiologically only to church polity. And here's the big one. None of Canada law says, and by the way, you don't adhere to US Constitutional liberty and constitutional norms, whereas Sharia law does the exact opposite. All right? Sharia law. And you don't have to take my word for it, there are countries right now where Sharia law governs. How do women dress in Sharia compliant nations are, constitutional liberties embraced in Sharia compliant nations. So you can play this game if you want, but I'll say, Ed. Ah, let's just keep it a buck, man. You are lying. You are lying. And then he's lying when he says. And no one's trying to force their Sharia compliance on you in America. well, say it, my man. You want to tell me why there's a fake Council of North America when you, you want to, you want to suspend that to me? My. You want to talk to me about these, man, why you gotta have a fee council, Mike? What is it about? My what? It's the Sharia Council of North America.
>> Jeff McIntosh: Guys.
>> Abraham Hamilton III: I know you're not. You're working so hard not to impose Sharia on anybody Else that there wouldn't be things that happen, you know, like, renting a water park and saying, this is a Muslim only gathering at this water park. That wouldn't happen. That wouldn't happen. Right, because you're not trying to impose Sharia on anybody. Right. And we have this other thing, you know, it's called history. How does it usually work? Because he mentioned, you know, Muslims are only, comprise only 1% of the American population. We're not a threat to you guys. Nobody. We're just. Sharia only applies to us in our private exercise of our religion. Right. Kind of like Muhammad had his private exercise of his religion in Medina, like that, until he became empowered. And he. And the empowerment allows freedom and allow for it. Let me ask you this. In Sharia compliance societies, can you draw pictures of Muhammad? Guys, I'm sharing this with you. And I've shared the shows we've done with Bill Federer, the shows we've done, describing the history, the shows we've done, articulating the expansion. What I would call Islamic colonization did not occur through, the free exercise of religion and freedom of the ballot box and the freedom of speech. That's not how it happened, guys. It's not. It's not. The same old rhythm and rhyme has transpired that when Islam is not a dominant influence, it appeals to be a docile cohabitative phenomenon until it expands. Remember what Eddie Issa said. I played the audio for you from the city council meeting in McKinney, Texas. When Eddie Issa, who explained, who described himself as a survivor of Sharia law in Iran, that's how he described himself. And he explained that when. When Islam is of less of an influence, the doctrine of Takia is perfectly allowable. Perfectly allowable. Now that's a great question to Merrill M. Asked, why wouldn't Jesse prepare to respond with simple responses like that? I have my own opinions about Fox News. You know, I think, you know, Fox News is interested. They want to try to be, how shall I say, say this? squeamish. Well, yeah, ratings oriented. But they don't want to seem as if, you know, they're bigoted. You know, I would just say the truth is not bigotry. The truth is not bigotry. And maybe he doesn't know the history. I don't know. But the rinse and repeat that we've seen in history from Islam is that going along to get along only occurs when you have minimal influence. And the minimal influence allows other things like lying and other things to be done in service of Islam. Did I mention CAIR is the same organization that the documents were found when CAIR said that they plan to use America's legal system against America to allow Islam to become dominant in the United States of America? Did I mention that? Guys, I'm sharing this with you because I want you to be prepared to respond to these things and to, understand that you're not being bigoted by expressing your concern. And it's the responsibility. The burden of proof, if you will, is on those who are saying, yes, we're compatible with constitutional liberties. I ain't from Missouri, but you got to show me.
M. Bennett: Muslim Brotherhood is the creation of the Muslim Brotherhood
You've got to show me. Then you have. And I'm not going to play this clip. I have it. But, That's right. And care is the creation of the Muslim Brotherhood whose objective is to accomplish. We seem to always come back here what the Ottoman Turks ought to accomplish. Had another clip I was going to show you where, Jesse Waters asked Al said about his support for sex, change operations on children. And in a very weird way, the conversation devolves into El Said asking Jesse Waters on live television if he's circumcised. Like, this is weird, man. What are you. What are you. What are you talking about? Trying to say it's the same type of thing. No, it's not. No, it's not. When you are trying to mutilate children's bodies in an effort to confirm a social, political phenomenon, one of these things is not like the other. We have, a, clear responsibility, guys, to understand the lessons taught from scripture, the lessons from history. This is why I spent the extensive amount of time I did with you sharing about the Barbary wars, which, unfortunately, our children are not taught in school. But the first war fought by the United States of America following our war for independence against Great Britain was a war against Islamic supremacists. Guys, that's just facts. So why don't we know about it? M. Because there are some people who have a vested interest in keeping truth concealed so that those of us who are ignorant end up becoming victimized as a result of that ignorance. But we don't have to go along with it. And this is why the insidious nature of these things need to be exposed. From the six to one donations in Los Angeles all the way to the Taqiyah doctrine to allow for Islamic supremacy. The views and opinions expressed in this broadcast may not necessarily reflect those of the American Family association or American Family Radio.
0:00 - 15:00. Jeremiah 17:9-10. Man’s sinfulness truly is the heart of the matter.
15:00 - 31:00. L.A.’s 6:1 campaign finance matching system demonstrates how corruption strengthens its nasty grip.
31:00 - 48:00. Taquiyah or nah… Abul Al-Sayed edition.
https://afafoundation.net/ | 1-800-326-4543 ext. 345
https://afr.net/BIBLESFORBABIES To donate call: 877-616-2396
Video Clip Links
Karen Bass
https://x.com/KarenBassLA/status/2089554288934785449
Abdul Al Sayed
0:00 - 15:00. Jeremiah 17:9-10. Man’s sinfulness truly is the heart of the matter.
15:00 - 31:00. L.A.’s 6:1 campaign finance matching system demonstrates how corruption strengthens its nasty grip.
31:00 - 48:00. Taquiyah or nah… Abul Al-Sayed edition.
https://afafoundation.net/ | 1-800-326-4543 ext. 345
https://afr.net/BIBLESFORBABIES To donate call: 877-616-2396
Video Clip Links
Karen Bass
https://x.com/KarenBassLA/status/2089554288934785449
Abdul Al Sayed
Live
Did you know American Family Radio is listener-supported? Your monthly financial support will allow us to continue upholding Godly values through our numerous channels, like American Family Radio, One Million Moms, The Stand magazine, and many more.
Become a Great Commission Partner TODAY to help AFR transform culture by rebuilding the family. When you donate today, you’ll get access to:
