Abraham Hamilton III Darkness is not an affirmative force. It simply reoccupies the space vacated by the light. This is the, uh, Hamilton Corner on American Family Radio. It should be uncomfortable for a believer to live as a hypocrite, delivering people out of the bondage of mainstream media
Kevin Freeman and the philosophies of this world.
Abraham Hamilton III God has called you and me to be his ambassadors, even in this dark moment. Let's not miss our moment. And now, the, uh, Hamilton Corner. Good evening, everybody. Welcome to the Hamilton Corner here on American Family Radio. I'm, um, your host, Abraham Hamilton iii, ready to rock and roll with today's edition of the program. At this very moment, many of you, if not most of you, are making your transition from your part time jobs where you generate an income, to your full time jobs where you cultivate an outcome. And as you do so, I want to remind you to do so with intentionality, understanding the primacy that God places on family and welcoming that primacy to govern and to guard and to guide your engagement, starting right in your homes. Uh, at this very moment, many of you, if not most of you, as you are making that transition, I want to encourage you to do so with intentionality. Because the family is the fundamental building block of society. The family is the fundamental component of the church. Jesus Christ is the head of his church and is the cornerstone. And the bride is comprised of individuals and families. And the primary institution tasked with the responsibility of being a part of the household of God generationally is through the family. If we neglect, if we ignore, if we allow the reality of the student, when fully trained, they will be like the teacher. And we continually outsource the discipleship responsibility. We should expect to get more, and not just quantitatively, but an increasingly negative iterations of what we have currently. Thank you very much for tuning into the program. Tuning into the program. I'm grateful to be with you, however you're listening. I know we have, uh, people who are live radio listeners, podcast listeners, podcast watchers, television show watchers. We're grateful to God for all the different ways he allows us to communicate with you and also grateful that you, uh, are inclined to allow us to be a part of your lives. I will continue to state this because the simple reality is darkness is not an affirmative force, but it reoccupies the space that is vacated by the light. And if we want to see things change in our nation and we need to start, uh, being vehicles for that change right where we live, I've been saying, and I will continue to say, that we have to live Locally, refuse to allow national headlines, national conversations to move you away from being salt and light right where you live. If something's going on in your community and you recognize the problem, perhaps God has opened your eyes in that fashion so that you can initiate the address for the problem. One of the things that is, uh, as more and more people in our country are embracing things like Marxism, and you have an entire political movement that is gaining momentum, unfortunately, in our country to where we look to governmental, uh, answers to problems, that is foundationally anti American. That is not who we have been, nor is it who we are, uh, but that we are a people who have sought to keep the government at bay. You know, one of these days, I'm going to have to go through all the areas where I would argue that the federal government is operating in an unconstitutional manner. You, you know, whenever any piece of legislation is proposed, the first question that every American citizen should have is, wait a minute, does the government have the authority to do that? And when you enter that assessment or begin that assessment, you're going to find that, no, I don't see the constitutional authority for that to happen at the federal level. But what has happened over time, these things have been normalized across generations. And it's very, very easy to point the finger at, you know, this person here did that, this person here did that. But a lot of the, A lot of the things that have transpired, folks, very simply, they have transpired on our watch. On our watch. You know, you, you have the situation right now, and people often forget, uh, that Cecile Richards, mom and Richards used to be the governor of Texas. There was a long time. It's been a long time since then. But in the past, Texas had a pretty robust Democrat presence. Then it became a Republican stronghold. But as I'm talking to you right now, the Senate race between James, uh, Talarico and Ken Paxton is close. How did that happen? Let's get into the word of God first before we start diagnosing those things. But this will be connected to what we're just talking about. Isaiah, chapter nine is where we're going to begin the program today. Isaiah, chapter 9, verses 8 through 10 is what I want to present to you for your consideration today in the book of Isaiah. If you turn a few pages prior, you'll see in chapter eight, the Lord was warning the Northern kingdom of Israel through the prophet of Isaiah. Through the prophet Isaiah, and specifies that Assyria would be an instrument of judgment against the Northern Kingdomnomics, names them specifically in chapter eight, chapter ten, uh, the Lord once again refers to judgment, uh, coming from afar, that there would be a people who would come, uh, from afar, indicating that the Assyrian invasion was something that was coming. But in chapter nine, the text we're going to read today, in verses eight through ten, the Lord reiterates the fact that he sent warning judgments. There's always been warning judges. And the purpose of the warning judgments are never to be cataclysmic, annihilationist in. In orientation. I mean, God is well capable of doing that. Hello, Sodom and Gomorrah, you know. Uh, but the Lord, prior to that, often sends warning judgments. And he, in this text, he explains that he sent warning judgments. But the people of Israel were, uh, so arrogant, so proud, uh, that they did not discern the warning judgments and just decided within themselves that they would press forward and rebuild. You know, and you're going to see that in the text. And I want you to consider whether or not some of this may sound familiar. Isaiah, chapter 9, verses 8 through 11. And this is what the word of God says. The Lord sends a message against Jacob, and it falls on Israel and all the people who know it. That is Ephraim and the inhabitants of Samaria asserting in pride and in arrogance of heart, the bricks have fallen down, but we will rebuild with smooth stones. The sycamores have been cut down, but we will replace them with cedars. In verse 10, uh, where it says, but we will rebuild with smooth stone, some translations there would say dressed stones. And what is happening? Note that the prophet Isaiah says, uh, that Ephraim and inhabitants of Samaria were asserting in pride and arrogance of heart. And they note the bricks have fallen down. So, so this. This tells you, and God is saying this, that they recognized that the bricks have fallen down. Something has gone wrong, man. They recognized that your bricks have fallen. They likewise recognize, uh, the sycamores have been cut down. So they recognize something had transpired. But instead of. In light of that recognition, the, um, pain that has befallen them, as evident by the fallen bricks and the sycamores cut down. And in light of that, turning to the Lord to say, lord, what is going on here? Seeking clarity from the Lord, Seeking. Seeking the Lord to show them what might have happened. They this, um, they just unilaterally declare, yeah, the bricks have fallen down, but we.
Speaker C We.
Abraham Hamilton III You see, the bricks have fallen down, but we will rebuild with smooth stones. The sycamores have been cut down, but we. We. We will replace them with cedars. What I'm driving at in our country right now, Many people recognize that some things that are off. I mean I was looking at some stuff today in the North Texas area. We've talked a bit on this show about the prevalence of uh, the Islamic presence in the north Texas area. But we hadn't talked as much about, you know, the construction of Hindu temples in North Texas. And I'm looking at this stuff and my wife and I had the privilege of going to India in 20. What was that? 2020. We went to India 2021. I don't remember this specific year, but I'm saying this stuff looks like the same stuff we saw in Mumbai. This, this, this is stuff we saw in Jangaretti Guru. These are things we saw there. Now these things are in Texas. I mean just last week or the last few weeks. This is wild, man. A woman strangles her own children to death and yet the pink wearing ladies are supporting the woman. And then you have jurors in the trial and I shared this on social media. You had jurors in the trial and I shared this on the show where it's 11 to 1 and it's one juror, one man who we now know them. You know, the man that was more melanated man, he said, listen, I'm not, I'm not moving past the fact that this woman strangled her three children. And the other jurors, like, I can't believe that he couldn't get over the fact that she, you know, violently murdered her three children. Yeah, that's really the point. Guys, something is off in our country. Something is off. I just saw another thing, and I may get to this later this week. One of these actors in Hollywood and he's going on and on pounding his chest, how proud he is that he's been able to be successful because he and his wife have not had children. I'm just like, you proud of that son? He's like, nah, he gives me more time to have more fun, to do more the things that I enjoy. I was like, yo. One of the major instances of matriculating into maturity as a man is where you stop living for yourself primarily. You know, like you're not living to just like, you can't be 15 forever, fam. Like Peter Pan was supposed to be a, uh, a cartoon, but you got real, real people trying to be real, like Peter Pants. Guys, things are off. We've talked about uh, the protracted non marital rates and, and, and, and how you have women seemingly motivated by this Massachusetts trial repeating the same things. You know, you have, you know, I'm not trying to throw shade on anybody, but this is just the reality. You have people for years who would say, man, listen, the governmental redistribution of wealth is touchstone Marxism. But then you have a Republican president or Republican Party who says, and by the way, we're going to redistribute wealth. And now all of a sudden, people forgot what socialism is. Well, you shouldn't try to call everything socialistic or what's not socialistic. The redistribution of using the federal government as a laundering mechanism to redistribute tax dollars. That's not. Come on, man, we got to wake up. We got to wake up. And there are many who are simply saying. And I get it because I see the problems. I feel the pain. Listen, I'm raising children in this environment, in this economy like, just like you all are. I pump gas just like you pump gas. I see what's happening. But if we recognize the bricks are falling, but we don't have the wherewithal to stop and say, whoa, Lord, we have, we have gone astray, uh, Lord, will you help us to turn rightly and build? Or we just push past it. Yeah, things are wrong. But we're going to rebuild with dress stones. We're going to rebuild with smooth stones. We're going to fix it. We're going to make America great on our own terms without ever considering. Man, listen, as Benjamin Franklin said, if a sparrow cannot fall to the ground without our Lord's awareness, can an empire rise without his aid? We like to talk about a lot of the things that are happening. All the feckless politicians in D.C. who keeps sending them there? Somebody is sending them there. Somebody's electing them. Why haven't we done a better job of vetting them? Why? They campaign one way and then they operate another way. I get that. But at some point, we have to take some level of responsibility. And then we get to the place to where. We get to the place to where we have liars and thieves. Oh, I see this comment. Dividends are Knox tax dollars. Not if they're in the negative. You can't promise 270 million US American adults $5,000 each, and it's going to be an additional $1.35 trillion at a minimum that you're spending. Where did that money come from? We only generated about 140 billion net in tariff revenue in light of the 100 billion plus that have been refunded as a result of Supreme Court opinions. Just saying, guys, bricks have fallen. But if we try to speed to say we will Rebuild without turning to the Lord. We're missing the key ingredient, a discipleship minute with Joseph Parker. He who dwells in the secret place of the most High shall abide under the shadow of the Almighty. I will say of the Lord, he is my refuge and my fortress, my God, in him I will trust. Psalm um, 91, verses 1 and 2. In a perilous world, so many people are afraid, they are fearful. In a world where inner cities and many other communities are just simply dangerous places to be, we see the drug trafficking, human trafficking, muggings, murders, physical and sexual abuse.
Speaker C There is a place of safety in
Abraham Hamilton III this world and it's found in God. It's found in that secret place, that intimate relationship with God. No one can protect you like God can. But it's important for us to do our part to appropriate, to place ourselves in that secret place.
Speaker C Praying Psalm 91.
Abraham Hamilton III Every day is a very wise thing for all believers to do. No one can protect you like God can.
Kevin Freeman Here's a ten dollar bill. It's got the picture of Alexander Hamilton on the front of it. You know, it's kind of sad. When I was 10 years old, everything that I could buy for a dollar now costs about $10. That's the cost of inflation. It's just paper. It's not backed by anything you can't exchange it for used to, but you can't do that anymore and that's unfortunate. You know, pirates wouldn't accept this. Pirates, they wanted gold and silver patriots. The founders of this nation also wanted gold and silver coin. In fact, they put a provision in the Constitution, 17 words, that said states could only make gold and silver coins tender within the states. That's why I wrote this new book, Pirate Discovering the Founder's Hidden Plan for Economic justice and and Defeating the Great Reset. It will explain exactly the history of money and exactly why gold and silver coins can be made modern with new technology and a useful monetary system. PirateMoneyBook.com. Shining light into the darkness.
Abraham Hamilton III This is the Hamilton Corner on American Family Radio. Welcome back to the Hamilton Corner. Abraham Hamilton III here, listen. And I'm sharing these things just for your information, but not for the sake of perpetuating any type of caustic, uh, reactionary, uh, response. But to understand what's happening around us to one know how to pray and then seek to have to seek to engage in the ways that we can, where we are and what we need to, because as I've been saying, and I will continue to say, all, uh, hands must be on deck. We need everybody engaged. And when I'm saying everybody engaged. We have to do things in terms of engaging our civil government. No doubt about it. We have to do things to engage the hearts and minds of people. The hearts and minds of people. You know, uh, I grieve at a host of things. Prevalent biblical illiteracy, the lack of economic literacy in terms of macro level economics, as well as just personal finance and things of that nature. And I'm engaged in trying to do things on a local level and in addition to what we do nationally. And I encourage every one of you to do the same thing. Uh, but I do want you to be aware of what's happening. So there's one thing I want to share with you. I've been kind of monitoring as it was unfolding, wanting to do a little bit of digging, a bit of due diligence before I brought this conversation to you. But this is a conversation that I think you need to be made aware of. What am I talking about now? Well, there is a man by the name of Jacob, uh, Roxon. Is that how to say his name? Right, Let me make sure I got it. Coxon. I'm sorry? Jacob Coxon is his name. And he is an AI researcher, mathematician and engineer. Uh, the whole thing. He'd worked previously for OpenAI in the construction of the chat, GPT, um, AI, uh, modality. He was in, subsequently hired by Anthropic. And Anthropic is the company that makes Claude. All right, now this caught my attention not only for the substantive comments that Jacob Rockson made, because what he did was he resigned from Anthropic. And this is the guy who was a true believer, all in an AI using his technological expertise, uh, to help build it. He believed in it wholeheartedly. But after working on AI for three years, he said, nah, I'm out, I'm out. And he specifically, I guess I'll read to you. He posted this on X and then shared a bit of information as to why he resigned. And we're gonna get into that conversation because he's done television interviews since then explaining his rationale. But he says this quote, I resigned from Anthropic today. I spent the last three years doing pre training research at both OpenAI and Anthropic. Neither company is acting responsibly. They are racing straight to self improving superintelligence and gambling with our lives. End quote. Now that's pretty, that's pretty strong language, pretty strong warning. Um, in addition to that warning, and he goes on to share more information On X about this. Um, but in addition to what he said, this caught my eye because I am aware that Anthropic is just about, what, six weeks away from their initial public offering. Many of you are familiar with that terminology. In the event that you're not familiar with that terminology. An initial public offering is what happens when a company make shares of its stock available to the public for acquisition, investment and then therefore the investors will be shareholders. All right, they, they reserve a part of the company's ownership to themselves so they can maintain control, board membership and that kind of thing. But the whole purpose for going public with the corporation is to try to raise the money that they need to scale whatever business enterprise is seeking to pursue. So most recently, some of you may be aware When Elon Musk's SpaceX went public, and they went public that the largest um, valuation of a public traded company in history, that the official numbers for SpaceX, uh, when their IPO the initial public offering was made was 1.77 trillion. By the end of the very first closing day. SpaceX closed with uh, an, with an over $2.1 trillion valuation. Prior to SpaceX, there had never been a publicly traded company whose IPO was at a trillion dollars or more. Never happened. Well, guess what, it just happened. You know, the whole story. You know, you guys, many of you heard the stories that uh, one of the things that Elon Musk did is that he gave his employees, everybody from you know, the janitors to the engineers working on building things, meaning the mechanical engineers, not just the technical computer engineers, but the mechanical engineers he would, uh, include in their compensation, shares of stock. And how that IPO made new uh, billionaires and new millionaires based on their stock holdings. Well, the Anthropic initial public offering is expected to be even higher than SpaceX. Current discussions are uh, that anthropic's, ah, IPO will be 2 trillion plus at the moment of IPO. I'm saying that because I don't know this for a fact, but I would imagine that someone who works in a critical role for Anthropic, or worked in a critical role for Anthropic, uh, like Jacob Coxon did, that he stood to make a lot of money if he just held on for about six more weeks. Again, I don't know him, I don't know his moral fiber, I don't know his moral code. All I know is what he has stated publicly. And he said, though you have this looming Anthropic IPO coming, where he very likely stands or stood to become very wealthy in a short amount of time. He said that I cannot continue to do what I have been doing because I am concerned that this, this AI race is going to be problematic for mankind. So he did some television interviews recently. I want you to hear Jacob Coxon for yourself. And I want us to think through and talk through where we are. And now when I'm saying this, all right, when I'm sharing this with you again, I'm not sharing this for you to be alarmed into trepidation or anything. Uh, but we need to be aware because Never forget Acts 17. God has ordained you and I for this moment. He has determined before time the boundaries of our habitation and the times in which we would live so that men should seek God. So our Lord is not surprised that we're living in an environment and living in an era to where our, uh, artificial intelligence as it exists currently is on the horizon. And what you're going to hear Jacob Coxson talk about is that his concerns is not about AI's capabilities currently, but, but the rate of progress and the movement toward the development of recursive self learning super intelligence and what that could mean for mankind in the not too distant future. Having said that, I want you to listen to and watch Jacob Coxon discussing his concerns in which he, he said that AI is gambling with our lives, that within the next decade, considering the race, the rate of progress, that it could be bad for mankind in short order. Listen to and watch clip number one. Clip one. Go.
Kevin Freeman Jacob, I appreciate you being with us. Um, first of all, I assume you are saying literally that you believe, uh, that AI could kill us all by the end of the decade. How would that happen? Like, what would that actually look like?
Kevin Freeman Yeah, so the precise scenario sounds a little bit like science fiction. Uh, it sounds like something that's not real, but I think it is frighteningly real. And it's easiest to understand it if you think about real things that happened two months ago. So two months ago, OpenAI agents, uh, AIs hacked into third party infrastructure entirely at their own accord. And this was like a concentrated hacking spree that they carried out of their own volition. And I think that if you extrapolate into the future, the level of capabilities of these AIs, with the same independent volition, they could cause extreme havoc. For example, hacking critical infrastructure building, extinction level bioweapons. There's a lot of, uh, ways that the AI could actuate itself in the world
Abraham Hamilton III within the next decade. AI can kill us all. Some of you may be aware of this, some of you may not be aware of this, but what he was referring to is that OpenAI, um, which is the company that's created ChatGPT, and the CEO of OpenAI is Sam Altman. Now one of the concerns that I've raised with AI is that of course AI is a tool, but here's the problem that I have with it, that a lot, a lot of the people that are driving this push towards artificial intelligence and then artificial general intelligence and artificial super intelligence, a lot of them are godless people. You know, Sam Altman is a quite um, loud homosexual, uh, and atheist. And these are the people that are driving the programming for this uh, algorithmic learning technology. Well, just two months ago they had this experiment that they conducted at OpenAI and they presented the AI with a prompt, but the AI in a, in a self initiating fashion without a human being initiating it, went uh, beyond the parameters of the, of the prompt, um, and hacked into various um, other organizations to accomplish the, the task, but in a manner that exceeded the capacity uh, for AI. And before we came on the air, Bobby was talking about it, the CEO of Anthropic, they've been pushing for this stuff. Pushing for it, pushing for it. And now that they've built it to where it is now, now they're crying out to the government for regulation, please, please regulate us now and things of that nature. And it's like what's going on here. And what Jacob Coxon is concerned about is the lack of ethical parameters for alchemical algorithmic learning in the AI methodologies and AI technology. He continues in his post, Jacob Coxon,
Kevin Freeman that is,
Abraham Hamilton III quote, do not under underestimate the power of this technology. This will soon be superhuman systems that can hack anything, revolutionize any field overnight and acquire real power and resources. We have all witnessed the progress in each of these domains and progress is not slowing. The people building AI earnestly. I'm sorry, the people building AI earnestly believe that it could kill us all by the end of the decade. This is not a marketing stunt. If anything, many executives and senior researchers will couch their phrasing in the press to sound sensible, but I hear the same people express fear privately. No other human activity poses this level of danger. That's what Jacob Coxon, the AI researcher, uh, posted online. So in addition to describing it as a phenomenon that if we don't get a proper handle on, on this, this, this could, could kill us within a decade. Um, and the rate of the progress is one of the things that is Startling, because, remember, he was all in. Jacob Coxson was all in at first. That's why he worked for these companies. But what he's seen now is caused him just about six weeks and some change short of what. What is being predicted as the largest IPO in the world, in which he more than likely stood to become a very wealthy man. He said, man, I can't be involved in this anymore. Listen to Jacob Cox and describe the rate of progress, concern and watch in clip number two. Clip to go.
Kevin Freeman Is it specifically when did your feelings about this technology change? Was it something about the rate of progress that you've seen?
Kevin Freeman Yeah, so I think it's really important to just look at the rate of progress and say, for example, in areas like coding or math. A couple of years ago, these eyes were just about helping humans a little bit. They could give you suggestions. Now they're close to replacing them. We still need humans at the beginning moment, but quite plausibly, within a year, we'll no longer need humans for doing research in many areas. Only on Tuesday, OpenAI solved a millennium problem, one of the biggest unsolved open problems in mathematics, purely autonomously using an AI. And I think what's most scary is if AI is used to make itself more intelligent. So you can take an AI and give it the problem of AI research, just like currently they've given it math research, you could make it do the tasks that we're currently doing. And then you get what's called an intelligence explosion. The AI just gets smarter and smarter with no human involvement necessary. And so you have a thing that is vastly smarter than humans. And this could be coming very soon.
Abraham Hamilton III So the rate of progress is the thing that alarmed Jacob Coxson. And when you're thinking about it like, well, I mean, this is wild. What kind of things are promulgated? Well, there's already evidence that AI has the capacity to concoct extension level bioweapons. Um, there have been experiments that show that has capacity for various cybersecurity hacks. You know, one of the more recent experiments is that in, in two days, AI was able to concoct, can concoct, access to penetrate, uh, various firewalls of foreign governments and in just two days. And the major concern in these are technologies. I'm not a techie, I know most of the listeners are not, are not, are not techies. But the concern is not just algorithmic learning, but when it gets to the place to where the AIs have the ability to expand its information base and becomes a Self learning phenomenon. Like for example at Anthropic they are, they are discussing the reality that it's CLAUDE AI system now has the capacity to upgrade and make the next version of CLAUDE on its own without any human intervention. That is what the concern is. Because if you have the capacity to be self learning but you do not have ethical boundaries and parameters that will say though you can do something, you probably should not do it, that is a concern. It's described as recursive self improvement. Here's one more clip on this for uh, the last few minutes where we end this segment. So clip number three. Clip three, go.
Kevin Freeman We mentioned a former colleague of yours currently works at Anthropic, basically endorsing the assessment that I could potentially kill everyone within a decade. In a follow up post he said to be clear, as we say in our latest risk report, I think the risk from present models is low. What I'm worried about is superintelligence arising from recursive self improvement as we've said is happening faster than, than we thought. I assume that's what the recursive self improvement is what you've just spoken about. Um, do you agree with him that the current models the risk is low but it's, it's just the speed with which this is now improving.
Kevin Freeman Exactly. I completely agree. It's right now there's no risk of extinction. The current models, the worst they can do is maybe hack into something, potentially cause a lot of damages in an infrastructure. But there's no, they're not intelligent enough to outsmart us at a level that would lead to extinction. I think what's just crazy is to look at the rate of progress and there is a very real possibility that in the immediate future these are years that like next year, the year after recursive self improvement will happen and will enter the phase of Evans post where he argues that there's a chance we could all die like that. That is coming soon.
Abraham Hamilton III That's what they're saying. Folks, I have more I want to say. Uh, but one of the major things that Jacob Cox and he worked for OpenAI initially he felt like their ethical considerations were even worse. Move over to Anthropic. But now he's saying not even Anthropic is doing what's necessary in order to keep this product development on an ethical course. When you look at the fundamental priorities that this administration has, rebuilding the American family through the various priorities, ensuring religious freedom is alive and well and flourishing in America, having a Department of justice that is actually focused on enforcing the laws of the land. I have a hard time disagreeing with any of them. Join Walker Wildmon and Rick Greene at the The Core 1pm Central weekdays on AFR or on the AFR app.
Kevin Freeman Wesley Biblical Seminary, we are working today to equip tomorrow's pastors and Christian leaders through biblical and theological in practical ministry. That's accredited, affordable, online and highly personal. So whatever your next step is in being equipped for ministry, we're here for you. And if you believe these are the
Abraham Hamilton III kinds of pastors we need leading our
Kevin Freeman churches in the future, we invite you to learn more about Wesley Biblical Seminary by visiting [email protected] today.
Abraham Hamilton III The Hamilton quarter podcast and one minute commentaries are available at afr.net back to the Hamilton Corner on American Family Radio. Welcome back to the Hamilton Corner. Abraham Hamilton III here. So what's driving this? If you know you have all of these red flags, what's this all about, guys? It's very simple in this regard. China is pushing for right now, the whole AI arms race, if you will, is a two horse race. It's the United States of America or it's China. And so though American companies have identified ethical concerns and considerations, the communist Chinese, which by the way, the theological underpinning of communism is atheism, the communist Chinese don't care a bit about the ethical concerns. So they're pushing forward full bore. And so the conundrum has been, well, we don't want China to get it first was twofold. Obviously, whoever achieves the most advanced AI first stands to make a whole lot of money. So let's be real about that, all right? And in addition to that, whoever makes the most AI first has the capacity to control the AI space. And if you have to ask whether or not you wouldn't want American corporations doing it or you want the communist Chinese, and it's a, uh, no brainer who the answer would be. But I would urge caution because, um, doing something like this and unleashing it upon the world and not heeding the warnings of people over and over and over again will prove detrimental. Now, as I said, um, I'm sharing this with you so you can be aware, so you would have the information not to provoke trepidation because, uh, the scripture is replete with instances where, uh, man has created something who they say that will run the world and God is the one who has a final say. So, and I expect the same thing here, that God ultimately would have the final say. So, but you need to be aware of what's happening you need to be aware that this is what people are pressing toward. I mean, I think it is, um, certainly noteworthy. Again, I don't know this Jacob Coxson fellow, but here he is most likely standing, standing in the face of a pretty significant wealth producing event and then he says, you know what, it's time for me to get off of this train. It's time for me to get off of this train. I think it's worth noting. I'm not saying you should be technology averse. I'm not saying that you need to be, uh, in fear because God has ordained us for this time, has ordained us for this moment. But you do need to be aware. You do need to be aware. Um, there are lots of people who are just so gung, uh ho about AI uh, that they're not heeding the concerns. There's some people who do, uh, not only see detriments, don't see any potential for benefits. And you say some people, all they see is benefits and they're ignoring the detriments. But it's important when somebody who's been working on something like this for years comes out and says, listen, we're getting in above our heads on this man. We need to take a few steps back. We need to take a few steps back. And I want to say, in light of um, especially what I was saying in the first segment, uh, that man, I am praying that the Lord would grace, uh, us with another awakening. Um, it is historically been demonstrated that when God has poured out his spirit in the past, it often happened during very, very dark times. During very, very dark times. And one of the things that have been consistent in various outpourings of the Lord's Spirit over time is that he would turn his people to prayer in a consistent and a dedicated manner. And um, I've been seeing that uh, in my own life and I see God moving more and more people in that direction. And I want to encourage you to pray for our, Pray for the world, sure, but pray for our nation in particular. Uh, because there are lots of things that are happening, lots of things that are being revealed. And people are proposing all types of, you know, potential solutions, but not many of them include turning to the Lord. That's why I pointed out that scripture from Isaiah today in Isaiah chapter 9, that to have kind of an arrogance and a hubris even to say we, uh, will rebuild with smooth stones, but not even considering how do we get to this place, um, I think that
Kevin Freeman is
Abraham Hamilton III an unwise course of action. All right, we're going to Go back to the state of Massachusetts for a moment and I'll just warn you. This is heartbreaking, but I want you to listen closely. When I play this clip, I want you to listen closely for, uh, the way these events unfolded there in the state of Massachusetts. You have a family. I want to pronounce the name properly. The Kutchko family. And at the time in 2024, uh, they had a 15 year old daughter. Mr. And Mrs. Kutzko had a 15 year old daughter. Um, unbeknownst to them, what you're going to hear, the school where she was going, Algonquin Regional High School, socially transitioned their daughter. In secret. The little girl was a little girl when she was at home with her parents and her brother. When she went to school, they were treating her as if she were a boy. The guidance counselor in particular was one of the people that encouraged the 15 year old to embrace a social transition. The 15 year old came to school and shared that she attempted to export her social transitioning from school to her home. To which her parents, who are devout Catholics, said they love their daughter too much to affirm a lie that they know their daughter was a girl. And so they would not call their daughter, uh, and treat their daughter as if she were a little boy. The 15 year old daughter shared that information with her counselor at school. Y' all know what happened next. The guidance counselor contacted the Massachusetts Department of Family Services and the Massachusetts Department of Family Services forcibly removed the 15 year old child from her parental home. The Kutzko family have not seen their daughter since 2024. And they are, uh, now engaged in a court battle because the Department of M, the Massachusetts Department of Children, the dcfs, Department of Children's and Family Services is seeking lawful authority to administer testosterone to this little girl who's now a 17 year old teenager. Mm, mhm. Here's a clip is about 1 minute and 16 seconds or so. Describing this case is clip number four. Clip four. Go.
Speaker C You know, Joseph and Arlene Kutzko haven't spoken to their daughter since the end of 2024, after the Department of Children and Family Services removed her from their home. Family claims it was because of their Catholic faith that would not allow them to affirm their daughter as a boy. An emotional Joseph Kutzko reading the birthday card his daughter Sophie gave him in October of 2024.
Abraham Hamilton III Without you, I would have nothing. So wholeheartedly, fully, sincerely, I love you with no end.
Speaker C Less than three months later, Child Services removed Sophie from their home and accused them of abuse. The Cuzco say their daughter's school, Algonquin, uh, Regional High School in Southborough, Massachusetts, exposed Sophie to a culture steeped in gender ideology and blame a school counselor for socially transitioning their daughter to becoming a boy without their knowledge or permission, they claimed. The counselor contacted Child Services. The school had no comment regarding the allegations. Now DCF has assumed guardianship of their daughter. A permanent restraining order remains against Arlene and Joseph and Sophie's older brother. Her father and mother are distraught.
Abraham Hamilton III Mama missed you. Please come home. Mama miss you. Please, I'm begging you.
Kevin Freeman Please.
Abraham Hamilton III M. Man, that's so sad that. That you talk about missing children. What do you do when the government takes your child? And I've warned about this. You know, these things are happening in other parts of, um, the world, and I said these things would be coming here, and they have come here. I can't imagine not seeing my daughter since 2024. And the state has entered into a, uh, guardianship in which they have a permanent restraining order against the parents. Now, um, the cut scores are being represented. I do think they will ultimately prevail in litigation. But think about this, man. At a minimum, a year and a half of your child's life today, and they're not going to court tomorrow, so it's probably going to be longer than that. From 2024, December of 2024, um, till now. What I didn't tell you yet is that the Massachusetts DCFS has the little girl housed in a dorm with little boys. She's staying in housing with the boys that are in state custody. Wonder how that's going to. And this is interesting. A part of the litigation that's pending is that while DCFS in Massachusetts is attempting to assert that this young Cusco lady, The young lady is a boy, they're seeking to provide birth control for her. Isn't that interesting? Isn't that interesting? I wonder how many other boys, quote unquote, are in DCFS custody that they're suing for the prerogative to be able to administer birth control. I wonder why they're doing that. Oh, that's right. Because in their worldview, boys can get pregnant. That's what it is. You see, guys, this made me sick to my stomach to read this. You saw those. Saw that girl's parents. You think they don't love their child? And what gives the state the, uh, wherewithal to say, well, we believe what we think is best for your child is best for your child, regardless of what you believe. And then we're going to Take them. And then here's the other thing. You think that they would have been able to forcibly remove that child from the home without the help of law enforcement? Guys, this. This thinks. When I'm saying that, uh, our country is not in a good place right now, man, don't mistake me. This is the best nation in the world. What I'm telling you is that the barbarians are not at the gate. The barbarians have come through. And this is heartbreaking, but if you notice a pattern. What was the pattern? They are a family of devout religious beliefs, yet they sent their child to Algonquin Regional High School. The school says, well, your parents may think one thing, but we have a different set of ideals. And so we will encourage you in this fashion. And it was at the school that the guidance counselor was one of the primary people, um, one of the primary people leading this child in social transition. And unsurprisingly, that this same guidance counselor is the one who called DCFS in the beginning from the school. When I tell you that the government school is not your friend. This is what I'm talking about and understand, you know. Well, Abe, I don't live in. In. In. In the Algonquin Regional High School area in Massachusetts. Okay. Okay. I'm sad to report that I can show you this in places all around the country. It's happened in Colorado. It's happened in other places all around the country. That a part of the thing that we have to come to terms with is the very fact that the school is. No. Is not a sufficient replacement for the parents. And when the kids go. Family prevails in litigation. You guys know the drill. You think that guidance counselor is going to feel any pain from this? Nope. Who's going to be in the hook for it? The Massachusetts taxpayers. So unless there is a comprehensive reckoning. Uh, and do you think also that this is just a coincidence that this happened in the same state where the mom strangled her children? And one of the jurors came out and says, we knew. We knew in this case that we were going to be able to make a statement for women. Did you see that? Did y' all see that? Oh, yeah. One of the other jurors said, well, we knew this would be a case that we would be able to make a change. This would be a statement for women.
Kevin Freeman Huh.
Abraham Hamilton III Huh. But I thought you weren't supposed to be watching stuff on the news media and all of that. My point in presenting this, presenting this to you guys is just like Isaiah said in Isaiah 9, verses 9 and 10 that bricks are falling. It would be unwise for us to press forward in arrogant to say, but we will rebuild. Guys, we have to turn back to the Would you join me in praying that the Lord would grace us by His Spirit, not because we deserve it, because, frankly, we do not, but because our God is rich in mercy. Would he grace us with an outpouring of his spirit, with an awakening of our nation, where we would once again recognize m that the greatness of a nation is determined by our posture concerning the King of Kings and the Lord of Lords. The views and opinions expressed in this broadcast may not necessarily reflect those of the American Family association or American Family Radio.
Abraham Hamilton III Darkness is not an affirmative force. It simply reoccupies the space vacated by the light. This is the, uh, Hamilton Corner on American Family Radio. It should be uncomfortable for a believer to live as a hypocrite, delivering people out of the bondage of mainstream media
Kevin Freeman and the philosophies of this world.
Abraham Hamilton III God has called you and me to be his ambassadors, even in this dark moment. Let's not miss our moment. And now, the, uh, Hamilton Corner. Good evening, everybody. Welcome to the Hamilton Corner here on American Family Radio. I'm, um, your host, Abraham Hamilton iii, ready to rock and roll with today's edition of the program. At this very moment, many of you, if not most of you, are making your transition from your part time jobs where you generate an income, to your full time jobs where you cultivate an outcome. And as you do so, I want to remind you to do so with intentionality, understanding the primacy that God places on family and welcoming that primacy to govern and to guard and to guide your engagement, starting right in your homes. Uh, at this very moment, many of you, if not most of you, as you are making that transition, I want to encourage you to do so with intentionality. Because the family is the fundamental building block of society. The family is the fundamental component of the church. Jesus Christ is the head of his church and is the cornerstone. And the bride is comprised of individuals and families. And the primary institution tasked with the responsibility of being a part of the household of God generationally is through the family. If we neglect, if we ignore, if we allow the reality of the student, when fully trained, they will be like the teacher. And we continually outsource the discipleship responsibility. We should expect to get more, and not just quantitatively, but an increasingly negative iterations of what we have currently. Thank you very much for tuning into the program. Tuning into the program. I'm grateful to be with you, however you're listening. I know we have, uh, people who are live radio listeners, podcast listeners, podcast watchers, television show watchers. We're grateful to God for all the different ways he allows us to communicate with you and also grateful that you, uh, are inclined to allow us to be a part of your lives. I will continue to state this because the simple reality is darkness is not an affirmative force, but it reoccupies the space that is vacated by the light. And if we want to see things change in our nation and we need to start, uh, being vehicles for that change right where we live, I've been saying, and I will continue to say, that we have to live Locally, refuse to allow national headlines, national conversations to move you away from being salt and light right where you live. If something's going on in your community and you recognize the problem, perhaps God has opened your eyes in that fashion so that you can initiate the address for the problem. One of the things that is, uh, as more and more people in our country are embracing things like Marxism, and you have an entire political movement that is gaining momentum, unfortunately, in our country to where we look to governmental, uh, answers to problems, that is foundationally anti American. That is not who we have been, nor is it who we are, uh, but that we are a people who have sought to keep the government at bay. You know, one of these days, I'm going to have to go through all the areas where I would argue that the federal government is operating in an unconstitutional manner. You, you know, whenever any piece of legislation is proposed, the first question that every American citizen should have is, wait a minute, does the government have the authority to do that? And when you enter that assessment or begin that assessment, you're going to find that, no, I don't see the constitutional authority for that to happen at the federal level. But what has happened over time, these things have been normalized across generations. And it's very, very easy to point the finger at, you know, this person here did that, this person here did that. But a lot of the, A lot of the things that have transpired, folks, very simply, they have transpired on our watch. On our watch. You know, you, you have the situation right now, and people often forget, uh, that Cecile Richards, mom and Richards used to be the governor of Texas. There was a long time. It's been a long time since then. But in the past, Texas had a pretty robust Democrat presence. Then it became a Republican stronghold. But as I'm talking to you right now, the Senate race between James, uh, Talarico and Ken Paxton is close. How did that happen? Let's get into the word of God first before we start diagnosing those things. But this will be connected to what we're just talking about. Isaiah, chapter nine is where we're going to begin the program today. Isaiah, chapter 9, verses 8 through 10 is what I want to present to you for your consideration today in the book of Isaiah. If you turn a few pages prior, you'll see in chapter eight, the Lord was warning the Northern kingdom of Israel through the prophet of Isaiah. Through the prophet Isaiah, and specifies that Assyria would be an instrument of judgment against the Northern Kingdomnomics, names them specifically in chapter eight, chapter ten, uh, the Lord once again refers to judgment, uh, coming from afar, that there would be a people who would come, uh, from afar, indicating that the Assyrian invasion was something that was coming. But in chapter nine, the text we're going to read today, in verses eight through ten, the Lord reiterates the fact that he sent warning judgments. There's always been warning judges. And the purpose of the warning judgments are never to be cataclysmic, annihilationist in. In orientation. I mean, God is well capable of doing that. Hello, Sodom and Gomorrah, you know. Uh, but the Lord, prior to that, often sends warning judgments. And he, in this text, he explains that he sent warning judgments. But the people of Israel were, uh, so arrogant, so proud, uh, that they did not discern the warning judgments and just decided within themselves that they would press forward and rebuild. You know, and you're going to see that in the text. And I want you to consider whether or not some of this may sound familiar. Isaiah, chapter 9, verses 8 through 11. And this is what the word of God says. The Lord sends a message against Jacob, and it falls on Israel and all the people who know it. That is Ephraim and the inhabitants of Samaria asserting in pride and in arrogance of heart, the bricks have fallen down, but we will rebuild with smooth stones. The sycamores have been cut down, but we will replace them with cedars. In verse 10, uh, where it says, but we will rebuild with smooth stone, some translations there would say dressed stones. And what is happening? Note that the prophet Isaiah says, uh, that Ephraim and inhabitants of Samaria were asserting in pride and arrogance of heart. And they note the bricks have fallen down. So, so this. This tells you, and God is saying this, that they recognized that the bricks have fallen down. Something has gone wrong, man. They recognized that your bricks have fallen. They likewise recognize, uh, the sycamores have been cut down. So they recognize something had transpired. But instead of. In light of that recognition, the, um, pain that has befallen them, as evident by the fallen bricks and the sycamores cut down. And in light of that, turning to the Lord to say, lord, what is going on here? Seeking clarity from the Lord, Seeking. Seeking the Lord to show them what might have happened. They this, um, they just unilaterally declare, yeah, the bricks have fallen down, but we.
Speaker C We.
Abraham Hamilton III You see, the bricks have fallen down, but we will rebuild with smooth stones. The sycamores have been cut down, but we. We. We will replace them with cedars. What I'm driving at in our country right now, Many people recognize that some things that are off. I mean I was looking at some stuff today in the North Texas area. We've talked a bit on this show about the prevalence of uh, the Islamic presence in the north Texas area. But we hadn't talked as much about, you know, the construction of Hindu temples in North Texas. And I'm looking at this stuff and my wife and I had the privilege of going to India in 20. What was that? 2020. We went to India 2021. I don't remember this specific year, but I'm saying this stuff looks like the same stuff we saw in Mumbai. This, this, this is stuff we saw in Jangaretti Guru. These are things we saw there. Now these things are in Texas. I mean just last week or the last few weeks. This is wild, man. A woman strangles her own children to death and yet the pink wearing ladies are supporting the woman. And then you have jurors in the trial and I shared this on social media. You had jurors in the trial and I shared this on the show where it's 11 to 1 and it's one juror, one man who we now know them. You know, the man that was more melanated man, he said, listen, I'm not, I'm not moving past the fact that this woman strangled her three children. And the other jurors, like, I can't believe that he couldn't get over the fact that she, you know, violently murdered her three children. Yeah, that's really the point. Guys, something is off in our country. Something is off. I just saw another thing, and I may get to this later this week. One of these actors in Hollywood and he's going on and on pounding his chest, how proud he is that he's been able to be successful because he and his wife have not had children. I'm just like, you proud of that son? He's like, nah, he gives me more time to have more fun, to do more the things that I enjoy. I was like, yo. One of the major instances of matriculating into maturity as a man is where you stop living for yourself primarily. You know, like you're not living to just like, you can't be 15 forever, fam. Like Peter Pan was supposed to be a, uh, a cartoon, but you got real, real people trying to be real, like Peter Pants. Guys, things are off. We've talked about uh, the protracted non marital rates and, and, and, and how you have women seemingly motivated by this Massachusetts trial repeating the same things. You know, you have, you know, I'm not trying to throw shade on anybody, but this is just the reality. You have people for years who would say, man, listen, the governmental redistribution of wealth is touchstone Marxism. But then you have a Republican president or Republican Party who says, and by the way, we're going to redistribute wealth. And now all of a sudden, people forgot what socialism is. Well, you shouldn't try to call everything socialistic or what's not socialistic. The redistribution of using the federal government as a laundering mechanism to redistribute tax dollars. That's not. Come on, man, we got to wake up. We got to wake up. And there are many who are simply saying. And I get it because I see the problems. I feel the pain. Listen, I'm raising children in this environment, in this economy like, just like you all are. I pump gas just like you pump gas. I see what's happening. But if we recognize the bricks are falling, but we don't have the wherewithal to stop and say, whoa, Lord, we have, we have gone astray, uh, Lord, will you help us to turn rightly and build? Or we just push past it. Yeah, things are wrong. But we're going to rebuild with dress stones. We're going to rebuild with smooth stones. We're going to fix it. We're going to make America great on our own terms without ever considering. Man, listen, as Benjamin Franklin said, if a sparrow cannot fall to the ground without our Lord's awareness, can an empire rise without his aid? We like to talk about a lot of the things that are happening. All the feckless politicians in D.C. who keeps sending them there? Somebody is sending them there. Somebody's electing them. Why haven't we done a better job of vetting them? Why? They campaign one way and then they operate another way. I get that. But at some point, we have to take some level of responsibility. And then we get to the place to where. We get to the place to where we have liars and thieves. Oh, I see this comment. Dividends are Knox tax dollars. Not if they're in the negative. You can't promise 270 million US American adults $5,000 each, and it's going to be an additional $1.35 trillion at a minimum that you're spending. Where did that money come from? We only generated about 140 billion net in tariff revenue in light of the 100 billion plus that have been refunded as a result of Supreme Court opinions. Just saying, guys, bricks have fallen. But if we try to speed to say we will Rebuild without turning to the Lord. We're missing the key ingredient, a discipleship minute with Joseph Parker. He who dwells in the secret place of the most High shall abide under the shadow of the Almighty. I will say of the Lord, he is my refuge and my fortress, my God, in him I will trust. Psalm um, 91, verses 1 and 2. In a perilous world, so many people are afraid, they are fearful. In a world where inner cities and many other communities are just simply dangerous places to be, we see the drug trafficking, human trafficking, muggings, murders, physical and sexual abuse.
Speaker C There is a place of safety in
Abraham Hamilton III this world and it's found in God. It's found in that secret place, that intimate relationship with God. No one can protect you like God can. But it's important for us to do our part to appropriate, to place ourselves in that secret place.
Speaker C Praying Psalm 91.
Abraham Hamilton III Every day is a very wise thing for all believers to do. No one can protect you like God can.
Kevin Freeman Here's a ten dollar bill. It's got the picture of Alexander Hamilton on the front of it. You know, it's kind of sad. When I was 10 years old, everything that I could buy for a dollar now costs about $10. That's the cost of inflation. It's just paper. It's not backed by anything you can't exchange it for used to, but you can't do that anymore and that's unfortunate. You know, pirates wouldn't accept this. Pirates, they wanted gold and silver patriots. The founders of this nation also wanted gold and silver coin. In fact, they put a provision in the Constitution, 17 words, that said states could only make gold and silver coins tender within the states. That's why I wrote this new book, Pirate Discovering the Founder's Hidden Plan for Economic justice and and Defeating the Great Reset. It will explain exactly the history of money and exactly why gold and silver coins can be made modern with new technology and a useful monetary system. PirateMoneyBook.com. Shining light into the darkness.
Abraham Hamilton III This is the Hamilton Corner on American Family Radio. Welcome back to the Hamilton Corner. Abraham Hamilton III here, listen. And I'm sharing these things just for your information, but not for the sake of perpetuating any type of caustic, uh, reactionary, uh, response. But to understand what's happening around us to one know how to pray and then seek to have to seek to engage in the ways that we can, where we are and what we need to, because as I've been saying, and I will continue to say, all, uh, hands must be on deck. We need everybody engaged. And when I'm saying everybody engaged. We have to do things in terms of engaging our civil government. No doubt about it. We have to do things to engage the hearts and minds of people. The hearts and minds of people. You know, uh, I grieve at a host of things. Prevalent biblical illiteracy, the lack of economic literacy in terms of macro level economics, as well as just personal finance and things of that nature. And I'm engaged in trying to do things on a local level and in addition to what we do nationally. And I encourage every one of you to do the same thing. Uh, but I do want you to be aware of what's happening. So there's one thing I want to share with you. I've been kind of monitoring as it was unfolding, wanting to do a little bit of digging, a bit of due diligence before I brought this conversation to you. But this is a conversation that I think you need to be made aware of. What am I talking about now? Well, there is a man by the name of Jacob, uh, Roxon. Is that how to say his name? Right, Let me make sure I got it. Coxon. I'm sorry? Jacob Coxon is his name. And he is an AI researcher, mathematician and engineer. Uh, the whole thing. He'd worked previously for OpenAI in the construction of the chat, GPT, um, AI, uh, modality. He was in, subsequently hired by Anthropic. And Anthropic is the company that makes Claude. All right, now this caught my attention not only for the substantive comments that Jacob Rockson made, because what he did was he resigned from Anthropic. And this is the guy who was a true believer, all in an AI using his technological expertise, uh, to help build it. He believed in it wholeheartedly. But after working on AI for three years, he said, nah, I'm out, I'm out. And he specifically, I guess I'll read to you. He posted this on X and then shared a bit of information as to why he resigned. And we're gonna get into that conversation because he's done television interviews since then explaining his rationale. But he says this quote, I resigned from Anthropic today. I spent the last three years doing pre training research at both OpenAI and Anthropic. Neither company is acting responsibly. They are racing straight to self improving superintelligence and gambling with our lives. End quote. Now that's pretty, that's pretty strong language, pretty strong warning. Um, in addition to that warning, and he goes on to share more information On X about this. Um, but in addition to what he said, this caught my eye because I am aware that Anthropic is just about, what, six weeks away from their initial public offering. Many of you are familiar with that terminology. In the event that you're not familiar with that terminology. An initial public offering is what happens when a company make shares of its stock available to the public for acquisition, investment and then therefore the investors will be shareholders. All right, they, they reserve a part of the company's ownership to themselves so they can maintain control, board membership and that kind of thing. But the whole purpose for going public with the corporation is to try to raise the money that they need to scale whatever business enterprise is seeking to pursue. So most recently, some of you may be aware When Elon Musk's SpaceX went public, and they went public that the largest um, valuation of a public traded company in history, that the official numbers for SpaceX, uh, when their IPO the initial public offering was made was 1.77 trillion. By the end of the very first closing day. SpaceX closed with uh, an, with an over $2.1 trillion valuation. Prior to SpaceX, there had never been a publicly traded company whose IPO was at a trillion dollars or more. Never happened. Well, guess what, it just happened. You know, the whole story. You know, you guys, many of you heard the stories that uh, one of the things that Elon Musk did is that he gave his employees, everybody from you know, the janitors to the engineers working on building things, meaning the mechanical engineers, not just the technical computer engineers, but the mechanical engineers he would, uh, include in their compensation, shares of stock. And how that IPO made new uh, billionaires and new millionaires based on their stock holdings. Well, the Anthropic initial public offering is expected to be even higher than SpaceX. Current discussions are uh, that anthropic's, ah, IPO will be 2 trillion plus at the moment of IPO. I'm saying that because I don't know this for a fact, but I would imagine that someone who works in a critical role for Anthropic, or worked in a critical role for Anthropic, uh, like Jacob Coxon did, that he stood to make a lot of money if he just held on for about six more weeks. Again, I don't know him, I don't know his moral fiber, I don't know his moral code. All I know is what he has stated publicly. And he said, though you have this looming Anthropic IPO coming, where he very likely stands or stood to become very wealthy in a short amount of time. He said that I cannot continue to do what I have been doing because I am concerned that this, this AI race is going to be problematic for mankind. So he did some television interviews recently. I want you to hear Jacob Coxon for yourself. And I want us to think through and talk through where we are. And now when I'm saying this, all right, when I'm sharing this with you again, I'm not sharing this for you to be alarmed into trepidation or anything. Uh, but we need to be aware because Never forget Acts 17. God has ordained you and I for this moment. He has determined before time the boundaries of our habitation and the times in which we would live so that men should seek God. So our Lord is not surprised that we're living in an environment and living in an era to where our, uh, artificial intelligence as it exists currently is on the horizon. And what you're going to hear Jacob Coxson talk about is that his concerns is not about AI's capabilities currently, but, but the rate of progress and the movement toward the development of recursive self learning super intelligence and what that could mean for mankind in the not too distant future. Having said that, I want you to listen to and watch Jacob Coxon discussing his concerns in which he, he said that AI is gambling with our lives, that within the next decade, considering the race, the rate of progress, that it could be bad for mankind in short order. Listen to and watch clip number one. Clip one. Go.
Kevin Freeman Jacob, I appreciate you being with us. Um, first of all, I assume you are saying literally that you believe, uh, that AI could kill us all by the end of the decade. How would that happen? Like, what would that actually look like?
Kevin Freeman Yeah, so the precise scenario sounds a little bit like science fiction. Uh, it sounds like something that's not real, but I think it is frighteningly real. And it's easiest to understand it if you think about real things that happened two months ago. So two months ago, OpenAI agents, uh, AIs hacked into third party infrastructure entirely at their own accord. And this was like a concentrated hacking spree that they carried out of their own volition. And I think that if you extrapolate into the future, the level of capabilities of these AIs, with the same independent volition, they could cause extreme havoc. For example, hacking critical infrastructure building, extinction level bioweapons. There's a lot of, uh, ways that the AI could actuate itself in the world
Abraham Hamilton III within the next decade. AI can kill us all. Some of you may be aware of this, some of you may not be aware of this, but what he was referring to is that OpenAI, um, which is the company that's created ChatGPT, and the CEO of OpenAI is Sam Altman. Now one of the concerns that I've raised with AI is that of course AI is a tool, but here's the problem that I have with it, that a lot, a lot of the people that are driving this push towards artificial intelligence and then artificial general intelligence and artificial super intelligence, a lot of them are godless people. You know, Sam Altman is a quite um, loud homosexual, uh, and atheist. And these are the people that are driving the programming for this uh, algorithmic learning technology. Well, just two months ago they had this experiment that they conducted at OpenAI and they presented the AI with a prompt, but the AI in a, in a self initiating fashion without a human being initiating it, went uh, beyond the parameters of the, of the prompt, um, and hacked into various um, other organizations to accomplish the, the task, but in a manner that exceeded the capacity uh, for AI. And before we came on the air, Bobby was talking about it, the CEO of Anthropic, they've been pushing for this stuff. Pushing for it, pushing for it. And now that they've built it to where it is now, now they're crying out to the government for regulation, please, please regulate us now and things of that nature. And it's like what's going on here. And what Jacob Coxon is concerned about is the lack of ethical parameters for alchemical algorithmic learning in the AI methodologies and AI technology. He continues in his post, Jacob Coxon,
Kevin Freeman that is,
Abraham Hamilton III quote, do not under underestimate the power of this technology. This will soon be superhuman systems that can hack anything, revolutionize any field overnight and acquire real power and resources. We have all witnessed the progress in each of these domains and progress is not slowing. The people building AI earnestly. I'm sorry, the people building AI earnestly believe that it could kill us all by the end of the decade. This is not a marketing stunt. If anything, many executives and senior researchers will couch their phrasing in the press to sound sensible, but I hear the same people express fear privately. No other human activity poses this level of danger. That's what Jacob Coxon, the AI researcher, uh, posted online. So in addition to describing it as a phenomenon that if we don't get a proper handle on, on this, this, this could, could kill us within a decade. Um, and the rate of the progress is one of the things that is Startling, because, remember, he was all in. Jacob Coxson was all in at first. That's why he worked for these companies. But what he's seen now is caused him just about six weeks and some change short of what. What is being predicted as the largest IPO in the world, in which he more than likely stood to become a very wealthy man. He said, man, I can't be involved in this anymore. Listen to Jacob Cox and describe the rate of progress, concern and watch in clip number two. Clip to go.
Kevin Freeman Is it specifically when did your feelings about this technology change? Was it something about the rate of progress that you've seen?
Kevin Freeman Yeah, so I think it's really important to just look at the rate of progress and say, for example, in areas like coding or math. A couple of years ago, these eyes were just about helping humans a little bit. They could give you suggestions. Now they're close to replacing them. We still need humans at the beginning moment, but quite plausibly, within a year, we'll no longer need humans for doing research in many areas. Only on Tuesday, OpenAI solved a millennium problem, one of the biggest unsolved open problems in mathematics, purely autonomously using an AI. And I think what's most scary is if AI is used to make itself more intelligent. So you can take an AI and give it the problem of AI research, just like currently they've given it math research, you could make it do the tasks that we're currently doing. And then you get what's called an intelligence explosion. The AI just gets smarter and smarter with no human involvement necessary. And so you have a thing that is vastly smarter than humans. And this could be coming very soon.
Abraham Hamilton III So the rate of progress is the thing that alarmed Jacob Coxson. And when you're thinking about it like, well, I mean, this is wild. What kind of things are promulgated? Well, there's already evidence that AI has the capacity to concoct extension level bioweapons. Um, there have been experiments that show that has capacity for various cybersecurity hacks. You know, one of the more recent experiments is that in, in two days, AI was able to concoct, can concoct, access to penetrate, uh, various firewalls of foreign governments and in just two days. And the major concern in these are technologies. I'm not a techie, I know most of the listeners are not, are not, are not techies. But the concern is not just algorithmic learning, but when it gets to the place to where the AIs have the ability to expand its information base and becomes a Self learning phenomenon. Like for example at Anthropic they are, they are discussing the reality that it's CLAUDE AI system now has the capacity to upgrade and make the next version of CLAUDE on its own without any human intervention. That is what the concern is. Because if you have the capacity to be self learning but you do not have ethical boundaries and parameters that will say though you can do something, you probably should not do it, that is a concern. It's described as recursive self improvement. Here's one more clip on this for uh, the last few minutes where we end this segment. So clip number three. Clip three, go.
Kevin Freeman We mentioned a former colleague of yours currently works at Anthropic, basically endorsing the assessment that I could potentially kill everyone within a decade. In a follow up post he said to be clear, as we say in our latest risk report, I think the risk from present models is low. What I'm worried about is superintelligence arising from recursive self improvement as we've said is happening faster than, than we thought. I assume that's what the recursive self improvement is what you've just spoken about. Um, do you agree with him that the current models the risk is low but it's, it's just the speed with which this is now improving.
Kevin Freeman Exactly. I completely agree. It's right now there's no risk of extinction. The current models, the worst they can do is maybe hack into something, potentially cause a lot of damages in an infrastructure. But there's no, they're not intelligent enough to outsmart us at a level that would lead to extinction. I think what's just crazy is to look at the rate of progress and there is a very real possibility that in the immediate future these are years that like next year, the year after recursive self improvement will happen and will enter the phase of Evans post where he argues that there's a chance we could all die like that. That is coming soon.
Abraham Hamilton III That's what they're saying. Folks, I have more I want to say. Uh, but one of the major things that Jacob Cox and he worked for OpenAI initially he felt like their ethical considerations were even worse. Move over to Anthropic. But now he's saying not even Anthropic is doing what's necessary in order to keep this product development on an ethical course. When you look at the fundamental priorities that this administration has, rebuilding the American family through the various priorities, ensuring religious freedom is alive and well and flourishing in America, having a Department of justice that is actually focused on enforcing the laws of the land. I have a hard time disagreeing with any of them. Join Walker Wildmon and Rick Greene at the The Core 1pm Central weekdays on AFR or on the AFR app.
Kevin Freeman Wesley Biblical Seminary, we are working today to equip tomorrow's pastors and Christian leaders through biblical and theological in practical ministry. That's accredited, affordable, online and highly personal. So whatever your next step is in being equipped for ministry, we're here for you. And if you believe these are the
Abraham Hamilton III kinds of pastors we need leading our
Kevin Freeman churches in the future, we invite you to learn more about Wesley Biblical Seminary by visiting [email protected] today.
Abraham Hamilton III The Hamilton quarter podcast and one minute commentaries are available at afr.net back to the Hamilton Corner on American Family Radio. Welcome back to the Hamilton Corner. Abraham Hamilton III here. So what's driving this? If you know you have all of these red flags, what's this all about, guys? It's very simple in this regard. China is pushing for right now, the whole AI arms race, if you will, is a two horse race. It's the United States of America or it's China. And so though American companies have identified ethical concerns and considerations, the communist Chinese, which by the way, the theological underpinning of communism is atheism, the communist Chinese don't care a bit about the ethical concerns. So they're pushing forward full bore. And so the conundrum has been, well, we don't want China to get it first was twofold. Obviously, whoever achieves the most advanced AI first stands to make a whole lot of money. So let's be real about that, all right? And in addition to that, whoever makes the most AI first has the capacity to control the AI space. And if you have to ask whether or not you wouldn't want American corporations doing it or you want the communist Chinese, and it's a, uh, no brainer who the answer would be. But I would urge caution because, um, doing something like this and unleashing it upon the world and not heeding the warnings of people over and over and over again will prove detrimental. Now, as I said, um, I'm sharing this with you so you can be aware, so you would have the information not to provoke trepidation because, uh, the scripture is replete with instances where, uh, man has created something who they say that will run the world and God is the one who has a final say. So, and I expect the same thing here, that God ultimately would have the final say. So, but you need to be aware of what's happening you need to be aware that this is what people are pressing toward. I mean, I think it is, um, certainly noteworthy. Again, I don't know this Jacob Coxson fellow, but here he is most likely standing, standing in the face of a pretty significant wealth producing event and then he says, you know what, it's time for me to get off of this train. It's time for me to get off of this train. I think it's worth noting. I'm not saying you should be technology averse. I'm not saying that you need to be, uh, in fear because God has ordained us for this time, has ordained us for this moment. But you do need to be aware. You do need to be aware. Um, there are lots of people who are just so gung, uh ho about AI uh, that they're not heeding the concerns. There's some people who do, uh, not only see detriments, don't see any potential for benefits. And you say some people, all they see is benefits and they're ignoring the detriments. But it's important when somebody who's been working on something like this for years comes out and says, listen, we're getting in above our heads on this man. We need to take a few steps back. We need to take a few steps back. And I want to say, in light of um, especially what I was saying in the first segment, uh, that man, I am praying that the Lord would grace, uh, us with another awakening. Um, it is historically been demonstrated that when God has poured out his spirit in the past, it often happened during very, very dark times. During very, very dark times. And one of the things that have been consistent in various outpourings of the Lord's Spirit over time is that he would turn his people to prayer in a consistent and a dedicated manner. And um, I've been seeing that uh, in my own life and I see God moving more and more people in that direction. And I want to encourage you to pray for our, Pray for the world, sure, but pray for our nation in particular. Uh, because there are lots of things that are happening, lots of things that are being revealed. And people are proposing all types of, you know, potential solutions, but not many of them include turning to the Lord. That's why I pointed out that scripture from Isaiah today in Isaiah chapter 9, that to have kind of an arrogance and a hubris even to say we, uh, will rebuild with smooth stones, but not even considering how do we get to this place, um, I think that
Kevin Freeman is
Abraham Hamilton III an unwise course of action. All right, we're going to Go back to the state of Massachusetts for a moment and I'll just warn you. This is heartbreaking, but I want you to listen closely. When I play this clip, I want you to listen closely for, uh, the way these events unfolded there in the state of Massachusetts. You have a family. I want to pronounce the name properly. The Kutchko family. And at the time in 2024, uh, they had a 15 year old daughter. Mr. And Mrs. Kutzko had a 15 year old daughter. Um, unbeknownst to them, what you're going to hear, the school where she was going, Algonquin Regional High School, socially transitioned their daughter. In secret. The little girl was a little girl when she was at home with her parents and her brother. When she went to school, they were treating her as if she were a boy. The guidance counselor in particular was one of the people that encouraged the 15 year old to embrace a social transition. The 15 year old came to school and shared that she attempted to export her social transitioning from school to her home. To which her parents, who are devout Catholics, said they love their daughter too much to affirm a lie that they know their daughter was a girl. And so they would not call their daughter, uh, and treat their daughter as if she were a little boy. The 15 year old daughter shared that information with her counselor at school. Y' all know what happened next. The guidance counselor contacted the Massachusetts Department of Family Services and the Massachusetts Department of Family Services forcibly removed the 15 year old child from her parental home. The Kutzko family have not seen their daughter since 2024. And they are, uh, now engaged in a court battle because the Department of M, the Massachusetts Department of Children, the dcfs, Department of Children's and Family Services is seeking lawful authority to administer testosterone to this little girl who's now a 17 year old teenager. Mm, mhm. Here's a clip is about 1 minute and 16 seconds or so. Describing this case is clip number four. Clip four. Go.
Speaker C You know, Joseph and Arlene Kutzko haven't spoken to their daughter since the end of 2024, after the Department of Children and Family Services removed her from their home. Family claims it was because of their Catholic faith that would not allow them to affirm their daughter as a boy. An emotional Joseph Kutzko reading the birthday card his daughter Sophie gave him in October of 2024.
Abraham Hamilton III Without you, I would have nothing. So wholeheartedly, fully, sincerely, I love you with no end.
Speaker C Less than three months later, Child Services removed Sophie from their home and accused them of abuse. The Cuzco say their daughter's school, Algonquin, uh, Regional High School in Southborough, Massachusetts, exposed Sophie to a culture steeped in gender ideology and blame a school counselor for socially transitioning their daughter to becoming a boy without their knowledge or permission, they claimed. The counselor contacted Child Services. The school had no comment regarding the allegations. Now DCF has assumed guardianship of their daughter. A permanent restraining order remains against Arlene and Joseph and Sophie's older brother. Her father and mother are distraught.
Abraham Hamilton III Mama missed you. Please come home. Mama miss you. Please, I'm begging you.
Kevin Freeman Please.
Abraham Hamilton III M. Man, that's so sad that. That you talk about missing children. What do you do when the government takes your child? And I've warned about this. You know, these things are happening in other parts of, um, the world, and I said these things would be coming here, and they have come here. I can't imagine not seeing my daughter since 2024. And the state has entered into a, uh, guardianship in which they have a permanent restraining order against the parents. Now, um, the cut scores are being represented. I do think they will ultimately prevail in litigation. But think about this, man. At a minimum, a year and a half of your child's life today, and they're not going to court tomorrow, so it's probably going to be longer than that. From 2024, December of 2024, um, till now. What I didn't tell you yet is that the Massachusetts DCFS has the little girl housed in a dorm with little boys. She's staying in housing with the boys that are in state custody. Wonder how that's going to. And this is interesting. A part of the litigation that's pending is that while DCFS in Massachusetts is attempting to assert that this young Cusco lady, The young lady is a boy, they're seeking to provide birth control for her. Isn't that interesting? Isn't that interesting? I wonder how many other boys, quote unquote, are in DCFS custody that they're suing for the prerogative to be able to administer birth control. I wonder why they're doing that. Oh, that's right. Because in their worldview, boys can get pregnant. That's what it is. You see, guys, this made me sick to my stomach to read this. You saw those. Saw that girl's parents. You think they don't love their child? And what gives the state the, uh, wherewithal to say, well, we believe what we think is best for your child is best for your child, regardless of what you believe. And then we're going to Take them. And then here's the other thing. You think that they would have been able to forcibly remove that child from the home without the help of law enforcement? Guys, this. This thinks. When I'm saying that, uh, our country is not in a good place right now, man, don't mistake me. This is the best nation in the world. What I'm telling you is that the barbarians are not at the gate. The barbarians have come through. And this is heartbreaking, but if you notice a pattern. What was the pattern? They are a family of devout religious beliefs, yet they sent their child to Algonquin Regional High School. The school says, well, your parents may think one thing, but we have a different set of ideals. And so we will encourage you in this fashion. And it was at the school that the guidance counselor was one of the primary people, um, one of the primary people leading this child in social transition. And unsurprisingly, that this same guidance counselor is the one who called DCFS in the beginning from the school. When I tell you that the government school is not your friend. This is what I'm talking about and understand, you know. Well, Abe, I don't live in. In. In. In the Algonquin Regional High School area in Massachusetts. Okay. Okay. I'm sad to report that I can show you this in places all around the country. It's happened in Colorado. It's happened in other places all around the country. That a part of the thing that we have to come to terms with is the very fact that the school is. No. Is not a sufficient replacement for the parents. And when the kids go. Family prevails in litigation. You guys know the drill. You think that guidance counselor is going to feel any pain from this? Nope. Who's going to be in the hook for it? The Massachusetts taxpayers. So unless there is a comprehensive reckoning. Uh, and do you think also that this is just a coincidence that this happened in the same state where the mom strangled her children? And one of the jurors came out and says, we knew. We knew in this case that we were going to be able to make a statement for women. Did you see that? Did y' all see that? Oh, yeah. One of the other jurors said, well, we knew this would be a case that we would be able to make a change. This would be a statement for women.
Kevin Freeman Huh.
Abraham Hamilton III Huh. But I thought you weren't supposed to be watching stuff on the news media and all of that. My point in presenting this, presenting this to you guys is just like Isaiah said in Isaiah 9, verses 9 and 10 that bricks are falling. It would be unwise for us to press forward in arrogant to say, but we will rebuild. Guys, we have to turn back to the Would you join me in praying that the Lord would grace us by His Spirit, not because we deserve it, because, frankly, we do not, but because our God is rich in mercy. Would he grace us with an outpouring of his spirit, with an awakening of our nation, where we would once again recognize m that the greatness of a nation is determined by our posture concerning the King of Kings and the Lord of Lords. The views and opinions expressed in this broadcast may not necessarily reflect those of the American Family association or American Family Radio.
0:00 - 15:00. Isaiah 9:8-10. Is hubris causing us to misunderstand the moment?
15:00 - 31:00. Jacob Coxon, former Anthropic AI researcher, resigned from the company because the AI race is “gambling with our lives.”
31:00 - 48:00. The MA Department of Family Services removed a 15 year-old from her family’s home because they refused to call their daughter a boy.
Did you know American Family Radio is listener-supported? Your monthly financial support will allow us to continue upholding Godly values through our numerous channels, like American Family Radio, One Million Moms, The Stand magazine, and many more.
Become a Great Commission Partner TODAY to help AFR transform culture by rebuilding the family. When you donate today, you’ll get access to: