Darkness as the Absence of Light and the Call to Be Ambassadors in Dark Times
Abraham Hamilton III Darkness is not an affirmative force. It simply reoccupies the space vacated by the light.
Abraham Hamilton III This is the, Hamilton Corner on American Family Radio.
Abraham Hamilton III It should be uncomfortable for a believer to live as a hypocrite, delivering people
Abraham Hamilton III out of the bondage of mainstream media and the philosophies of this world.
Abraham Hamilton III God has called you and me to be his ambassadors, even in this dark moment. Let's not miss our moment.
Abraham Hamilton III And now, the Hamilton Quarter.
E.W. Jackson Hosts, Expresses Gratitude for Network Support and God's Vision
Bishop EW Jackson Good evening, everybody. In for Abraham Hamilton III is yours truly, E.W. jackson. Great to be with you again today. I'll be, on with you again tomorrow evening. And I will also have my podcast available to you on Wednesday morning, the Awakening Podcast. So it's just, as always, great to be with you. Thank you so much for your prayers and your support for this great network, for our hosts and all of the staff, and engineers and people behind the scenes who make all of this possible. We are grateful to you and of course, we are so very grateful to God for having put this vision in the heart of Brother Don so many years ago and to see it bearing fruit. And I can't tell you again, how important the fruit is that this network is bearing and how desperately our country needs it.
Introducing Artificial Intelligence as a Topic of Discussion and Initial Reactions
So, God, thank you all for continuing to support us. Look, a couple things I want to talk to you about tonight. One I had never talked about publicly before. So you all are going to be the first to hear me opine, as we used to say in the law, about this issue. And that is the issue of A.I. I am curious about what you all think about this. I'm going to share with you my thoughts about it. I certainly want to hear from you. I'm going to open up the lines and not the next segment, the segment after that, because I've got something else I'm going to talk to you about in the next segment. But, I'm going to open up the lines then, and I, want to hear. Well, of course you can comment on any issue we talk about, but I'm just curious how you all feel, because this is the two polls that seem to be developing, right? One is, we're looking at the end of the world. AI may be the very thing that is the tipping point that destroys everything. I mean, his visions really, of the Terminator, right? And this last, scandal over, these AI agents.
Exploring AI Agents, Software Systems, and the Concept of 'Hugging Face'
You know, isn't it weird to, to hear the way this is talked about? These AI agents got out well, but they're not talking about human beings. They're talking about software systems. AI software systems that apparently broke loose from their intended parameters and began to invade, this platform called Hug Face and, hack it, which is apparently a platform for testing and developing AI. And apparently these again, AI agents. The first time I heard that I thought AI agents. We got AI agents. But again, it's not talking about human beings, it's talking about actual software systems developed, under the rubric of AI to do, you know, the whole variety of different things that AI does. And these were all basically being tested and being worked through. And apparently they broke through on their own, and got into hug face. And I don't know what, what all they did with hug face. I guess they hugged, hugged faced, Hug face, hug face.
Two Polls on AI: Existential Threat Versus Technological Advancement and Progress
And again, when they talk about this stuff, technically none of this is discussed. Hug faces, of course, as a platform that's not a human being. And the face you're talking about apparently is not the face of a human being. what they're really talking about because I guess hug face is the notion of basically you go in and you get intimate with someone, in exploring the relationship. Well, this is talking about apparently software systems getting intimate with each other and exploring each other, basically testing. That sounds a little bit weird, but I think that's a fairly accurate description of what's actually happening here. if you can apply that to technology, that, that's really what's kind of happening. So the one poll is this is it. I mean, this, this stuff is so terribly dangerous that we are going to destroy ourselves with it, or it will, it is going to destroy us. So that's one poll. The other poll obviously is, look, this is just like any other technological breakthrough. It is intimidating. It is for some frightening, purports maybe to take away a bunch of jobs that people can now do themselves, that this technology will now do for them, which means it's going to put a lot of people in the street, put a lot of people out of work. all of that is true. But, but it, it is going to bring with it a new set of jobs. It's going to bring with it new technologies, it's going to be with new efficiencies. in the end it is going to, just like every other technology, it is going to be very, very helpful and help it advance society and help advance human flourishing. And of course this is added to that argument. And if we don't do it, China certainly will and some other bad actors may. And so in spite of what may be the risks and dangers associated with, and of course with it.
Navigating Risks of New Technology and the Geopolitical Advantage of Moving Forward
And of course there are always potential risks and dangers with any new technology that we don't fully understand. But we can't not move forward because if we don't, we, we leave the advantage to a communist dictatorship. The so called People's Republic of China is about as much of a people's republic as the Nazis were people's republic. But nevertheless they will move forward with it and we will give them an advantage that could very well allow them to become the preeminent superpower of the world. So that's the other argument that is made in terms of we've just got to go forward with it. And of course there's some tangential things that come out of that. You know, what do we do about these data centers and how much power they're going to use and the noise they make and the land they're going to take up and the, the way they're going to change neighborhoods and so forth. You know, that's, that's sort of, that's more of the logistical question about how this stuff actually is going to play out in the real world as this technology develops. So that, that's kind of where, where the arguments lie. So now let me, let me just tell you where I stand on it so far.
Christian Perspective on AI: Avoiding Fear, Focusing on God's Judgment, and End Times Prophecy
First of all, the Word of God makes clear, what is that? first Timothy 1:11, I believe it is. God has not given us a spirit of fear, but of love and power and a sound mind. So I don't think that we as Christians ought to ever, ever traffic in fear. I don't think we ought to ever allow ourselves to be guided by fears of what might happen, particularly with technology. Because you see, we understand that nothing, no technology is going to destroy the world. The world is going to be brought under judgment by Almighty God. Now there may be some technological things that develop that sort of lend themselves to the end times process. And I do believe, you know, when the Bible talks about the image of the beast dying and coming back to life, you, know, I think about and the false prophet making the image of the beast speak. Well, I think, wow, that was written 2,000 years ago. What in the world could have produced such an effect 2,000 years ago? Well, we know now AI can, now AI can mimic a human being quite easily. I mean it is a little disconcerting, folks, to think that you or I, somebody could put an image of you or me or anybody else into a, what's a seemingly real life situation in which we're doing Something wrong, and it's not us at all. I mean, but it would look very, very real and would be very, very convincing to people. And it's already happened. It means ruined people's lives.
AI's Role in End Times Scenarios and the Primacy of God's Will Over Technology
That is a little bit disturbing. so some of this technology may well lend itself to some of the things that are going to happen in the end times, at the end of days, as God prepares final judgment on mankind. But it's not the technology. Ultimately, it's going to be the key. It's going to be the will and plan and purpose of Almighty God. History is going to be folded up no matter what. And so it's not the technology that ought to scare us. it's the fear of the Lord that ought to predominate in our thinking, and knowing God's going to work this thing out. So we shouldn't be afraid of technology. And think about this, folks.
Comparing AI Risks to Nuclear Power: The Necessity of Technological Advancement and National Security
Some of the most dangerous technology ever developed, mankind, by mankind. In fact, probably the most dangerous technology ever developed was the nuclear bomb. Nuclear power. We could have said, you know what? We're not, Whoa, we're not developing that. We're not using that. But if we hadn't, we probably would have lost, who knows, 2 to 4 million people trying to bring Japan, to an unconditional surrender. not to mention the very likelihood is that Russia, China would have gone on to develop the nuclear weapon anyway, and we would have been left basically at their mercy. We could not afford to simply ignore the technological breakthroughs that nuclear power was creating for us. We couldn't, because our enemies certainly weren't going to ignore it. And we would have put ourselves at a very, very dangerous disadvantage if we had. And I think the same is true with AI. I mean, I think it does have potential risks.
The Real Risk with AI: Human Control, Programming Bias, and Targeting Conservatives by Big Tech
I think it does have potential dangers to it. But by the way, I'm convinced of this, that the risk and the danger is not the technology, it's people. As always, it's what people will do with the technology that's the real risk. Because technology is going to ultimately be controlled by people, how people program it, what people use it for. I think I've shared with you all, I am having a devil of a time, and I use that word intentionally, a devil of a time. With Google right now. I mean, they're, they are blocking our emails, they're giving us all kinds of difficulties. And the chairman of the ftc, the Federal Trade Commission, has acknowledged that they've got many complaints that Google is targeting conservatives. They're, they're, they're stopping our emails from being delivered. and you all know what the research engines do and the AI does. I mean, it's biased. It's completely biased. You ask certain questions and you get an answer that is not based on objective facts but based on somebody's opinion. Well, it's not the AI's opin, it's whoever programmed that software. And you got a bunch of leftists working in big tech with, with a leftist worldview, a Marxist socialist worldview.
AI's Potential for Discrediting Individuals and the Problem of Biased Tech Platforms
But they could use this technology to some very, very dangerous ends. I mean, imagine that they want to target somebody who they don't like, whose voice they don't want heard. They want to discredit you, destroy your reputation. Now I say, when I ran for Lieutenant governor, what the media did to me was try to make me out to be a hater and a bigot and oh, he hates homosexuals, he's anti gay, you know, blah, blah, blah, the whole thing. Imagine AI, what didn't even exist then. And that was only 12 years ago, folks. That was only 12 years ago and AI didn't exist. Imagine what they could do now. So Google is already using the technology. I think everyone, in fact, I had a meeting with some folks to talk about this issue and several people, several people at the meeting said, yeah, we, me too, we've had our difficulties. One person testified the fact that Google had completely lost all of their emails and they were never recovered. Never recovered. One person said, you know, my, my, my, social media following was growing on YouTube. Growing, growing, growing. And all of a sudden, boom, it just stopped one day. Just stopped and hasn't grown since. Now, you know, that's, that's not coincidence. That's, that's not even organic. Which, because generally things, something growing, it just keeps growing, right? But, oh no, no, suddenly it stopped. I've had the same experience. So, so we know people are the problem, not the technology, but how people will use it. This is Bishop E.W. jackson in for Abraham Hamilton III here on the Hamilton Corner standby. We'll be back in just a moment for more discussion.
Call for Listener Support to Sustain American Family Radio and the Podcast
Abraham Hamilton III Hello, I'm Abraham Hamilton iii. Did you know that this content is listener supported? Without people like you, this podcast would not exist. That's why we need you. A generous monthly gift of any amount will help sustain American Family Radio and specifically this podcast.
Invitation to Become a Monthly Financial Partner for American Family Radio
Please consider becoming a monthly financial partner today by visiting afr.netgive that's afr.net give.
Discussion on President Trump's Ban of Certain Media Outlets from the White House
Abraham Hamilton III Shining light into the darkness. This is the Hamilton Corner on American Family Radio.
Bishop EW Jackson We're back. This is Bishop E.W. jackson in for Abraham Hamilton III here on the Hamilton corner. Now, the sets. I wanted to put first of all, the issue of AI in front of you and ask what you think about that. I'll be taking your calls in the next segment. The number is 888-589-8840. The next thing I want to talk about is some of President Trump's actions here. I want to know what you think about these. One I think is completely justified. There's another that I think one could raise questions about. At least I would, but I don't think it's a terrible situation. So what am I getting at? Well, the first one is he banned CNN and ms, which is, I guess Marxist, socialist, and politico from the White House. And of course the media is up in arms. And, you know, he said this is what dictators do. And I mean, these people are so full of themselves. And it really is. He didn't ban all media. And I don't know how many media organizations are in the White House press corps, but I have to assume there's a hundred of them. I mean, I don't know. In fact, let me see if I can find out. But there's certainly more than three. And they're not the only liberals. So why did the President ban them? I don't think we're given a really, detailed answer on this, but let me just say, in my view, the President doesn't have to give a detailed answer because what we need to remember is this, while he's living there, it is his house. And I think if he banned all media from the White House and people probably would raise some questions about that because then they would say, well, my goodness. So he doesn't want to put out any news to anybody. In other words, he doesn't want his administration to be transparent. He doesn't want the people to know what the business of the government is that he's doing. And of course we as the people do have a right to know, to an appropriate extent. Obviously there's some state secrets and things that should not be revealed to the public. And we all understand that. But generally speaking, when it comes to policy, when it comes to decisions regarding the safety, the security, the well being of the American people, the money that we're spending, because it's our money, not President Trump's, not the Congress's, it's our money doesn't belong to the government, comes from us, we've got a right to know about those things. If the president shut all that down, then I think all of us would say, whoa, whoa, whoa, wait a minute, what is going on here? But that's not what he's done. He's just banned these three organizations,
Abraham Hamilton III I
Bishop EW Jackson think, and I have not caught up with this yet. But I think that, Vice President Vance has offered an explanation for what is on the president's mind in having done so. But, you know, frankly, from my perspective,
Abraham Hamilton III folks, I don't think the president owes
Bishop EW Jackson anybody an explanation unless he wants to give one. Because if these organizations are, in his view, misbehaving, telling lies, slandering him, putting out bad information, they can still, by the way, do their own investigating. They can still do their own reporting. He's not stopping them from reporting. It's just that they won't have access to the White House and may not have access to him anymore directly. They can still go to the legislature and ask questions. They can still catch him, moving about along with, I assume, the rest of the press gaggle and ask questions. But they're not gonna be given the privileged access of being in the White House anymore. And to me, that is a privilege. It is not a right of any media organization to be in the White House. It's just not. And these elite media types, they have been chagrined and angry over the president bringing in podcasters and bringing in conservative outlets and giving them an opportunity to be there to ask questions of the president and find out what the president is thinking and have direct access to him. They've been doing all that as well, and the media hates it. They've been opening it up, not closing it down. Yeah, I mean, you say, well, but he's bringing in people who would likely agree with him most of the time, probably, but those people have generally been shut out, and the media never complained about that, as these really are a bunch of spoiled wimps who just want their way and feel like they're somehow special, like they are God's gift to the country. And how dare you suggest that any media outlet, particularly these three. CNN, the Communist News Network, MS, the Marxist Socialist Network, and Politico. How dare you suggest that they should not have access to the President of the United States and the White House? Yeah, well, I dare suggest it. I don't think they have a right to it. And so they don't have it now for the time being. And so goodbye, good riddance. Now, that's one thing. and I completely agree with what the president has done. I don't I don't see that there's a problem with that at all. And I think who are complaining about it are just spoiled brats. And all this stuff about that's what dictators do is nonsense. Are they that ignorant or are they just willing to say almost anything even if it doesn't make sense just to get a row out of people and try to get people worked out? A, dictator shuts the press down and doesn't allow anybody to say anything other than what has been approved by the government. That's what a dictator does. Now somebody needs to tell these dumb dumbs that the President doesn't come anywhere near that because he simply doesn't have the power to do that. He can complain, he can say, I don't like this outlet. I don't like that outlet. I wish they wouldn't say this. I don't want them to say that they're wrong. He can do that, but that's all he can do because they can print anything or write anything or say anything they want, even if it's wrong,
Caroline because
Bishop EW Jackson that's what the First Amendment allows them to do. he's a dictator. I mean, these people need to, they really, somebody needs to give them a lesson in civics or something because they just, here again, I don't know whether it is just gross ignorance or whether just, just gross venality. So they just say these things because they like the echo chamber that they say them in and they like hearing themselves tell these lies and put forth this slander because they think it makes President Trump look bad. It makes them look good because now his there is, there is poor, wounded victims. Oh, we feel so sorry for them. Look, look, they have been the victims of a dictator. I mean, what they're really victims of is their own psychological dysfunction, frankly, because that's what that is. I mean, that's paranoid delusion. President Trump is, he's nobody's dictator and he is no threat to our constitutional republic whatsoever. They are, they are the ones who are. Because when you have a corrupt media that won't tell the truth, that is the kind of thing that can erode a system like ours from within. Jesus said, you should know the truth. The truth shall make you free. Well, if you got people manufacturing lies, what are those lies calculated to do? Put people in bondage? If one is true, the other is true. If lies make you free, the truth makes you a slave. And that's really what they, what they are. They don't. They're, probably Too stupid to understand this. But that's really what they're getting at. Because really what they want is a system that forces people into the mold that they want us to fit into. Now what is that? It might not be direct slavery and chains and physical chains, but, but it is a kind of social and cultural pressure that is the equivalent of slavery. That's what every communist system is. That's what every socialist system is. imagine China with its demerit system. If you are heard to say things or do things contrary to the expectations of the Communist Party of China, you can get demerits. And, and when you get those demerits, your privileges, your shopping privileges, your working privileges, where you live, are circumscribed in order to punish you for not conforming to what the party expects. What is that? That's slavery. Just slavery by another name. And these, these media people with all of their, their touted commitment to freedom, they're not commit, committed to freedom at all. They're committed to imposing upon the American people their way of thinking. And they really have a major problem with the fact that we think for ourselves. Which is why, you know, you've seen all these, appellations applied to us, you know, the deplorables and yeah,
Caroline you
Bishop EW Jackson name it, that's the most infamous one. But everything you can imagine to suggest that we're just stupid, we're automatons, we don't think for ourselves. What they really mean is we don't think the way they think. And for them, that demonstrates that we're really not even worthy of freedom because we don't really know what to do with it. Because if we really knew what to do with it, we would mimic exactly what they tell us to do. So, yeah, they're out of the White House. Boo hoo. Oh, what a tragic day it is for quote, unquote, our democracy. Well, we're not a democracy anyway. We're a constitutional republic. And they need to get a revelation on that as well.
Parting Ways on President Trump's Meeting with Muslim Socialists like Mamdani
Bishop EW Jackson so that was, that was one thing. The other thing, before I run out of time, here, is the visit to Mamdani. Now I tell you, here's where the President and I part company. Not because I think he's doing something wrong, I guess. But folks, I couldn't do it. I really couldn't. Because I really believe that Mamdani and El Sayed and these Muslim socialists, I really believe that they're out to destroy this country. I really believe that that's not just something I say because I think it sounds good. Or like these leftists do, he's a dictator. I mean, they just say this stupid stuff. if they really believe that, they really, they're truly idiots. But I say this based on very rational, logical facts. This is the history of Islam. Infiltration and takeover. Infiltration and takeover. And Mamdani has made clear he is a socialist. He doesn't like private property. He doesn't like capitalism. I don't think he even likes this country. And El sayed the same thing. You, know, it's American behavior that kind of brought 911 on us and we kind of did it to ourselves. And if you think that way about America, that tells me not only do you not like our country, you hate it. But it's like I always said about President Barack Obama. I said. And his wife as much as said this, didn't she? The only. She said, she said, I have never been proud of my country. Or something to that effect. I've never been proud of my country until now. Meaning that the only thing they like about America is when it puts them in power. Other than that, America does nothing. Right? So, Mom, Donnie, we've got people come from all over the world and see our grocery store system and just can't believe it. I mean, they're in awe. Mom, Donnie thinks NewSong York can do better. They can put up a couple of grocery stores, only going to cost about $30 million, but no big deal. And they're going to do it better than the grocery stores because they don't like our free market system. They think that the government is a much better way to decide who gets what. And in every country where that's been tried, what do people have? Long lines and few choices. Long lines, long waits, few choices. And for the President to sit down with him, to me, it does nothing for President Trump. I think it does a lot for Mamdani, because in the end it. Well, you know, maybe, maybe he can be worked with. Maybe, maybe we can see some legitimacy in him. I don't. I don't. And I've heard all kinds of explanations. Well, he's a businessman. He's thinking about what happens after he leaves the presidency. He's got a lot of business in NewSong York, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. I don't know. I don't know the President personally. I don't know what's thinking about this. But I'll tell you what, it gives me a queasy feeling when I see him standing with Mamdani and the two of them are smiling because I think Mamdani is a threat to our constitutional republic. And when I say that, folks, I don't mean in any way to suggest that somebody needs to take him out or any crazy stuff like that. I'm just saying people shouldn't be voting for folks like this. I mean, remember, Mamdani was not born in the United States of America. Thank God he's not eligible for the presidency. Whew, man.
Bishop EW Jackson Not that I can't believe the American people would vote for him, but I remember. Who was it just recently? I've been saying for a long time, I would never vote for a Muslim to do anything in our country. I just wouldn't. That doesn't mean they don't have the legal right to run. That doesn't mean the American people don't have the legal right to vote for them. They do. And I'm not saying I would outlaw that or there's something. No, I'm just saying I personally, as a Christian, as a citizen of our constitutional republic, I would not vote for one of them because I do not believe that their ideological and theological perspective is compatible with our constitutional republic. I wouldn't vote for them. But I heard somebody saying that. Who was it? Oh, yeah. Dannah Bash. That's deplorable. I can't. I can't believe. That's just horrible that anybody would think that. Yeah, well, if you love this country, to me that's the only way you can think. The number is 8885-8988-4088-8589-8840. Any topic I brought up or anything you want to bring up, feel free.
Alternative Email Services and the Need for God's Intervention Against Big Tech Control
Give me a call back in a moment.
Kendra Fostering and adoption is not a band aid for infertility. Like, it is a calling and God can change the desire of your heart and make that so rewarding. It's the most beautiful, selfless thing. It's pure religion, but it's not a fix to I desire biological challenge. God has to deal with that in your heart separately.
Resources for Informed Voting and Preserving Freedoms: Introducing I Voter Guide
Bishop EW Jackson Hannah's heart encouraging coup through infertility and miscarriage. Saturdays, 4am Central on AFR or on the AFR app.
Jeff Chamblee Are you concerned the media and candidates may not provide valid information so you can vote wisely and preserve your religious, political and economic freedoms? Ivyerguide.com is not connected to any candidate, but researches thousands of candidates across the nation, gathering scorecards, donation records, endorsements and candidate questionnaires. Go to ivoterguide.com to get factual information that's ivoterguide.com.
Revisiting Trump's White House Media Ban and Churchill Bust Removal: Presidential Prerogative
Abraham Hamilton III The Hamilton Quarter podcast and one minute commentaries are available at afr.net Back to the Hamilton Corner on American Family radio.
Bishop EW Jackson We're back. J.D. vance said this quote, if you're going to engage in what effectively is far left propaganda, why would a Republican White House give you special access? He said, that's what the President decided, that we're not going to give you special access to the White House if you engage in what is effectively far left propaganda. I think that's completely within the President's purview. I said, after all, it is his house while he's living there. Now, he doesn't get to permanently live there, but while he's living there, it is his house. I mean, I had a major problem when Barack Obama got into the White House and removed the bust of, Winston Churchill. I forget what he replaced it with, but he basically sent it into, some archive basement somewhere because he, And I remember him saying, yeah, because Churchill's associated with colonialism and what a, what a man. I tell you, boy, that is ignorance gone to seed. So he basically. Have you never read a history book? You never read about Winston Churchill being the courageous proponent for Great Britain standing up against the Nazis? That means nothing to him. No, because, you know, he's, he's associated with colonialism. I mean, come on, read a book. I mean, my goodness gracious, that again, colonialism is just like slavery. People were exploring the world and I, say that was the age of conquest and the strong subjugated the weak. It happened everywhere. It happened intercontinentally, it happened intra continentally, it happened on continents, it happened between continents. It was the way of the world. But somehow that disqualified Winston. So. But you know what, in the end, while he was living there, it was his house. And if he didn't want to bust, up Winston Churchill. So I did Ward Churchill. He didn't want to bust up Winston Churchill in his Oval Office while he was living there. That's his prerogative. I thought he was completely wrong, but that's the way it works. And we can't force him, say, well, we're going to. You got to have that bust in there anyway. Not while he's living there. So President Trump doesn't want people in his house while he's living there. He put them out. And, so deal with it. They're suing, of course. Try to get back in the numbers. 8, 8, 8, 5, 8, 9. That's 8, 8, 8, 589-8840, 8. 885-89-8840. We got four lines. Let's come right to you. Barbara in Georgia.
Caller Perspectives on AI, Islam's Incompatibility with Western Life, and Avoiding Fear
Barbara, welcome.
Caroline Hello. thank you. Well, I pretty much agree with everything you talked about tonight, but, but I'll hit on two things.
Caroline AI.
Caroline AI is already out of the box. somehow the, the bandwidth, the, the power that's associated with it is bringing us to that prophecy in the Bible that talks about. they're going to merge themselves, but they won't fit. You know, it's such a large bandwidth, they're able to send literally traces of human, humans and demons are jumping on the bandwagon. I can't prove it to you, but I know the area I live in. It is pronounced and it is widespread and we have computers that have detected this kind of stuff. So, so that's AI people, they just need to get with God because that's the only defense against it. the other one is Islam. Islam is totally and completely incompatible with the western way of life in any country. You can go back across history the problem and find nation after nation they've Trojan horse thin with the lie of peaceful religion. It ain't a religion, that's the first thing. It is a controlling Iranical philosophy. And wherever they go, that is what they do. They destroy nation upon nation. Why? Because they're emissaries of the devil. And you can line their book up with our book and it's never going to match.
Bishop EW Jackson All right, Barbara, Barbara, listen, you preaching. Thank you for the call, Barbara. I mean, yeah, I agree with you entirely. That's why by the way, that was first Timothy, second Timothy, chapter one, verse seven. I think I gave you the wrong site when I quoted it. First Timothy, chapter one, verse seven. But God has not given us a spirit of fear, but of love and power and a sound mind. So we don't need to be frightened of AI. Are there appropriate parameters that should be set? Sure, I don't have a problem with that. but fear of it turning it over to communist China. But to me, if you want to talk about fear, that would be a much more frightening scenario. So like I say about Iran, I don't like these high gas prices any more than anybody else does.
Prioritizing National Security Over Short-Term Economic Concerns like Gas Prices
And I'm not some multi billionaire where it doesn't really matter. It matters to me and my wife and to our budget. But I'll tell you what, I'd rather pay a little bit higher gas than have a nuclear weapon head hitting for me. And I know that's exactly what Iran would do. If somebody did not put a stop to it, and President Trump has done that, and I think the rest of this stuff will get under control. Maybe not as quickly as we'd like. I hope it happens quickly enough to affect the elections. But even if it doesn't, I hope the American people, particularly Christians, realize we're. We're playing the long game here, and we can't just kind of vote short term pocketbook issues while the fate and security of our nation is at stake. Let's go to Jane in Oklahoma.
Discussion on BRICS Nations, Their Agenda, and President Trump's Meetings with Mamdani
I believe that is Jane. Welcome.
Caroline Hi. Good to hear you, Bishop Jackson.
Bishop EW Jackson Thank you.
Caroline Listen, I remember way back when Mamdani got elected, they said that his. He was bankrolled by his mother in India. Now, the brick India is one of the Brics nations. I guess it's, Brazil, Russia, India, China, and okay, they are. They were gathered together with express purpose of bringing down the look that. I'm surprised nobody heard that, I guess when I did. But it's, It's. It's. It's regarding a lot of this stuff that I hear going down, and I go, brics nations.
Caroline Brics nations. Why aren't you talking about that?
Bishop EW Jackson Yeah.
Caroline So what do you think?
Bishop EW Jackson Well, Jane, I guess I want to ask you this question because we. I love President Trump. I think he's really done a tremendous job serving this country. what do you think he is trying to accomplish in this is now the second or third meeting with Mamdani? What do you think he's trying to do from your perspective?
Caroline Well, I can't gainsay, Trump. He's always a surprise, and it's often a smile. But, I think maybe he's. You know what I mean? Anyway, I think that perhaps he's trying to do something to, soften that or whatever is going on here.
Bishop EW Jackson Yeah. So better. Better the. The. The enemy, you know, than the enemy, you don't. Or is it. What was the old Godfather saying, Keep your. Keep your friends close and your enemies closer. So, I don't know. He's. He is a strategist. Jane, thank you for the call. We, got four lines here. Let me. Let me go on. Gives. Go ahead. Go forward and give someone else. We've got Pamela in Tennessee. Pamela, welcome.
The Compatibility of Islam with the US Constitution and the Decline of Western Civilization
Hi, Pamela, you there?
Caroline Yes, I'm here.
Bishop EW Jackson Go right ahead. Pamela, you're on.
Caroline Okay.
Caroline Thank you for taking my call. My question is, why would any Muslim be allowed to run for any public office in the United States of America based upon their beliefs or ideology? Because it is antithetical to our Constitution? And why would it not be considered, treasonous or an attempted cool coup to our Constitution and our way of life?
Bishop EW Jackson Wow, Pamela, that is a loaded question. Thank you so much for the call, Pamela. Well, first of all, folks, believe it or not, we have a very limited, very limited restrictions on who may and may not run for office in our country. I mean, for example, you all may not have ever thought about this, but do you know that a convicted felon cannot vote in most jurisdictions, but do you know that that same convicted felon could actually run for office? Yeah, I know. Seems a little bit weird, doesn't it? But you couldn't vote for yourself, but you could run. our Constitution really opens it up for almost anybody to run for anything. And, and I don't see any legal prescriptions. That's why I said I don't. I'm not saying the American people don't have a legal right to vote for a Muslim. I'm not saying, a Muslim, if he's an American citizen or she is an American citizen, doesn't have a right to vote legally. But I am saying the American people ought not vote for them. and by the way, I looked up brics, which I'd heard of before, but I hadn't really paid much attention to it. But it is an intergovernmental organization, of ah, major emerging economies that is designed to increase global influence and get this counterbalance Western dominated institutions. Now what in the world does that mean? I'll tell you what it means to oppose the United States because Great, Britain and France and Spain and Germany, I mean, they're pretty much irrelevant at this point. It's to counterbalance the United States. We bestride the Western world. I tell people always when they say we've got to save Western civilization, I say, well then say what you really mean. You've got to save America.
Agreeing with Trump's Media Access Decisions and Viewing Islam as a False Religion
Because Western civilization, if you're talking about Europe, it's gone already. Muslims have pretty much taken over and they've completely rejected their Christian and Judeo Christian heritage. So thank you for the call, Pamela. Let's go to Arlen in Texas. Arlen, welcome. Arlen, are you there?
Caroline yes sir. Thanks for taking my call. I'll listen to you for several years.
Bishop EW Jackson Thank you.
Caroline I just want to agree on the, situation with President Trump. He has, like you say, he has a right to let whoever come in there and those people have been lying for a long time. I don't, I'm not. I might mess up the Dan Rather thing where he got kicked off the air. I want to say he kind of botched up a story about President Bush and they kicked him off the air, if I remember right.
Bishop EW Jackson Yep.
Caroline Well, these people, they botched up all kinds of stories and they just keep on, they're able to keep on lying and then agree with you and several of the other callers on the Muslims. I mean, that's, in my opinion, that's a false religion. And they are like you say, you hear, they come in, they want to be friendly or whatever at the beginning, but then when, when the majority of them get in there and take over, then they're, they're kicking you out. Just like in Minneapolis and all that up there. I don't even know how that was even allowed to happen. You know, I mean, that's, it's confusing to be honest with you. But I'll let you go. Let some other people, ah, call in.
Bishop EW Jackson Well, all. And thank you so much for the call. folks, I'm going to be in Detroit in a couple of days and my understanding is Detroit has been completely taken over by Islam. Dearborn, as you all know, which is not far away. My understanding Dearborn is a Muslim city and I've heard people report that you can hear the call to Muslim prayer. You think you're in the Middle East. right. That's not fitting into American culture. That's taking over certain areas and you know, the imposition of Sharia law and all of that. I mean, all kinds of issues here. And by the way, let me just say, folks, we don't hate Muslims. God loves them and he wants them. We're talking now about the national security and well being of the United States of America and whether Islam is compatible with it. And it has say anything about hating Muslims, but we do hate what it represents. And I just want to underscore what Allan said. It is a false religion. It is a false religion, period. It is not legitimate. It is a ancient cult. And I've said before, I'll say it again, I hate Islam. I don't hate Muslims, but I hate Islam because it's a false way.
Addressing Gmail's Dominance and Trusting God to Bring Big Tech to Heel
Trying to convince people that it's the true way. Okay, we got time for one more call. Let's go to Julie in Arkansas. Julie, welcome.
Caroline Yes, I just wanted to give you an alternative to Gmail. and that is proton P R O T O N. I use it.
Bishop EW Jackson I use it.
Caroline Do you? Okay. Okay, cool. I just knew that you were talking about Gmail earlier and it's kind of like, oh, so, yeah, I'm Julie.
Bishop EW Jackson Here's the problem. Julie, here's the problem. Gmail has got the email system cornered. I mean, think about it. How many people do you know who don't have a Gmail account even if they have something else? Almost everybody has a Gmail account. And that's the problem. It is so widespread now. They've got so much power over our ability to communicate with each other that something's got to reign them in. and so you all pray for us because I say Google may be big, but they're not bigger than God. and I think it's going to take the hand of God bringing these people to heal. So we're working on it. Believe me. We're not. Certainly not the size of a Google by any stretch of the imagination, but David wasn't the size of Goliath either, but he brought him down. Folks, that's going to do it for today. As always, great to be with you. Thank you all so much. God bless each and every one of you, and I appreciate your encouragement.
Concluding Thoughts: Standing Up, Stepping Up, Speaking Up, and Refusing to Back Down
Stand up. Step up.
Caroline Speak up.
Bishop EW Jackson Refuse to back up. Because we cannot be defeated if we will not quit because we are on God's side.
Caroline M.
Jeff Chamblee The views and opinions expressed in this broadcast may not necessarily reflect those of the American Family association or American Family Radio.
Darkness as the Absence of Light and the Call to Be Ambassadors in Dark Times
Abraham Hamilton III Darkness is not an affirmative force. It simply reoccupies the space vacated by the light.
Abraham Hamilton III This is the, Hamilton Corner on American Family Radio.
Abraham Hamilton III It should be uncomfortable for a believer to live as a hypocrite, delivering people
Abraham Hamilton III out of the bondage of mainstream media and the philosophies of this world.
Abraham Hamilton III God has called you and me to be his ambassadors, even in this dark moment. Let's not miss our moment.
Abraham Hamilton III And now, the Hamilton Quarter.
E.W. Jackson Hosts, Expresses Gratitude for Network Support and God's Vision
Bishop EW Jackson Good evening, everybody. In for Abraham Hamilton III is yours truly, E.W. jackson. Great to be with you again today. I'll be, on with you again tomorrow evening. And I will also have my podcast available to you on Wednesday morning, the Awakening Podcast. So it's just, as always, great to be with you. Thank you so much for your prayers and your support for this great network, for our hosts and all of the staff, and engineers and people behind the scenes who make all of this possible. We are grateful to you and of course, we are so very grateful to God for having put this vision in the heart of Brother Don so many years ago and to see it bearing fruit. And I can't tell you again, how important the fruit is that this network is bearing and how desperately our country needs it.
Introducing Artificial Intelligence as a Topic of Discussion and Initial Reactions
So, God, thank you all for continuing to support us. Look, a couple things I want to talk to you about tonight. One I had never talked about publicly before. So you all are going to be the first to hear me opine, as we used to say in the law, about this issue. And that is the issue of A.I. I am curious about what you all think about this. I'm going to share with you my thoughts about it. I certainly want to hear from you. I'm going to open up the lines and not the next segment, the segment after that, because I've got something else I'm going to talk to you about in the next segment. But, I'm going to open up the lines then, and I, want to hear. Well, of course you can comment on any issue we talk about, but I'm just curious how you all feel, because this is the two polls that seem to be developing, right? One is, we're looking at the end of the world. AI may be the very thing that is the tipping point that destroys everything. I mean, his visions really, of the Terminator, right? And this last, scandal over, these AI agents.
Exploring AI Agents, Software Systems, and the Concept of 'Hugging Face'
You know, isn't it weird to, to hear the way this is talked about? These AI agents got out well, but they're not talking about human beings. They're talking about software systems. AI software systems that apparently broke loose from their intended parameters and began to invade, this platform called Hug Face and, hack it, which is apparently a platform for testing and developing AI. And apparently these again, AI agents. The first time I heard that I thought AI agents. We got AI agents. But again, it's not talking about human beings, it's talking about actual software systems developed, under the rubric of AI to do, you know, the whole variety of different things that AI does. And these were all basically being tested and being worked through. And apparently they broke through on their own, and got into hug face. And I don't know what, what all they did with hug face. I guess they hugged, hugged faced, Hug face, hug face.
Two Polls on AI: Existential Threat Versus Technological Advancement and Progress
And again, when they talk about this stuff, technically none of this is discussed. Hug faces, of course, as a platform that's not a human being. And the face you're talking about apparently is not the face of a human being. what they're really talking about because I guess hug face is the notion of basically you go in and you get intimate with someone, in exploring the relationship. Well, this is talking about apparently software systems getting intimate with each other and exploring each other, basically testing. That sounds a little bit weird, but I think that's a fairly accurate description of what's actually happening here. if you can apply that to technology, that, that's really what's kind of happening. So the one poll is this is it. I mean, this, this stuff is so terribly dangerous that we are going to destroy ourselves with it, or it will, it is going to destroy us. So that's one poll. The other poll obviously is, look, this is just like any other technological breakthrough. It is intimidating. It is for some frightening, purports maybe to take away a bunch of jobs that people can now do themselves, that this technology will now do for them, which means it's going to put a lot of people in the street, put a lot of people out of work. all of that is true. But, but it, it is going to bring with it a new set of jobs. It's going to bring with it new technologies, it's going to be with new efficiencies. in the end it is going to, just like every other technology, it is going to be very, very helpful and help it advance society and help advance human flourishing. And of course this is added to that argument. And if we don't do it, China certainly will and some other bad actors may. And so in spite of what may be the risks and dangers associated with, and of course with it.
Navigating Risks of New Technology and the Geopolitical Advantage of Moving Forward
And of course there are always potential risks and dangers with any new technology that we don't fully understand. But we can't not move forward because if we don't, we, we leave the advantage to a communist dictatorship. The so called People's Republic of China is about as much of a people's republic as the Nazis were people's republic. But nevertheless they will move forward with it and we will give them an advantage that could very well allow them to become the preeminent superpower of the world. So that's the other argument that is made in terms of we've just got to go forward with it. And of course there's some tangential things that come out of that. You know, what do we do about these data centers and how much power they're going to use and the noise they make and the land they're going to take up and the, the way they're going to change neighborhoods and so forth. You know, that's, that's sort of, that's more of the logistical question about how this stuff actually is going to play out in the real world as this technology develops. So that, that's kind of where, where the arguments lie. So now let me, let me just tell you where I stand on it so far.
Christian Perspective on AI: Avoiding Fear, Focusing on God's Judgment, and End Times Prophecy
First of all, the Word of God makes clear, what is that? first Timothy 1:11, I believe it is. God has not given us a spirit of fear, but of love and power and a sound mind. So I don't think that we as Christians ought to ever, ever traffic in fear. I don't think we ought to ever allow ourselves to be guided by fears of what might happen, particularly with technology. Because you see, we understand that nothing, no technology is going to destroy the world. The world is going to be brought under judgment by Almighty God. Now there may be some technological things that develop that sort of lend themselves to the end times process. And I do believe, you know, when the Bible talks about the image of the beast dying and coming back to life, you, know, I think about and the false prophet making the image of the beast speak. Well, I think, wow, that was written 2,000 years ago. What in the world could have produced such an effect 2,000 years ago? Well, we know now AI can, now AI can mimic a human being quite easily. I mean it is a little disconcerting, folks, to think that you or I, somebody could put an image of you or me or anybody else into a, what's a seemingly real life situation in which we're doing Something wrong, and it's not us at all. I mean, but it would look very, very real and would be very, very convincing to people. And it's already happened. It means ruined people's lives.
AI's Role in End Times Scenarios and the Primacy of God's Will Over Technology
That is a little bit disturbing. so some of this technology may well lend itself to some of the things that are going to happen in the end times, at the end of days, as God prepares final judgment on mankind. But it's not the technology. Ultimately, it's going to be the key. It's going to be the will and plan and purpose of Almighty God. History is going to be folded up no matter what. And so it's not the technology that ought to scare us. it's the fear of the Lord that ought to predominate in our thinking, and knowing God's going to work this thing out. So we shouldn't be afraid of technology. And think about this, folks.
Comparing AI Risks to Nuclear Power: The Necessity of Technological Advancement and National Security
Some of the most dangerous technology ever developed, mankind, by mankind. In fact, probably the most dangerous technology ever developed was the nuclear bomb. Nuclear power. We could have said, you know what? We're not, Whoa, we're not developing that. We're not using that. But if we hadn't, we probably would have lost, who knows, 2 to 4 million people trying to bring Japan, to an unconditional surrender. not to mention the very likelihood is that Russia, China would have gone on to develop the nuclear weapon anyway, and we would have been left basically at their mercy. We could not afford to simply ignore the technological breakthroughs that nuclear power was creating for us. We couldn't, because our enemies certainly weren't going to ignore it. And we would have put ourselves at a very, very dangerous disadvantage if we had. And I think the same is true with AI. I mean, I think it does have potential risks.
The Real Risk with AI: Human Control, Programming Bias, and Targeting Conservatives by Big Tech
I think it does have potential dangers to it. But by the way, I'm convinced of this, that the risk and the danger is not the technology, it's people. As always, it's what people will do with the technology that's the real risk. Because technology is going to ultimately be controlled by people, how people program it, what people use it for. I think I've shared with you all, I am having a devil of a time, and I use that word intentionally, a devil of a time. With Google right now. I mean, they're, they are blocking our emails, they're giving us all kinds of difficulties. And the chairman of the ftc, the Federal Trade Commission, has acknowledged that they've got many complaints that Google is targeting conservatives. They're, they're, they're stopping our emails from being delivered. and you all know what the research engines do and the AI does. I mean, it's biased. It's completely biased. You ask certain questions and you get an answer that is not based on objective facts but based on somebody's opinion. Well, it's not the AI's opin, it's whoever programmed that software. And you got a bunch of leftists working in big tech with, with a leftist worldview, a Marxist socialist worldview.
AI's Potential for Discrediting Individuals and the Problem of Biased Tech Platforms
But they could use this technology to some very, very dangerous ends. I mean, imagine that they want to target somebody who they don't like, whose voice they don't want heard. They want to discredit you, destroy your reputation. Now I say, when I ran for Lieutenant governor, what the media did to me was try to make me out to be a hater and a bigot and oh, he hates homosexuals, he's anti gay, you know, blah, blah, blah, the whole thing. Imagine AI, what didn't even exist then. And that was only 12 years ago, folks. That was only 12 years ago and AI didn't exist. Imagine what they could do now. So Google is already using the technology. I think everyone, in fact, I had a meeting with some folks to talk about this issue and several people, several people at the meeting said, yeah, we, me too, we've had our difficulties. One person testified the fact that Google had completely lost all of their emails and they were never recovered. Never recovered. One person said, you know, my, my, my, social media following was growing on YouTube. Growing, growing, growing. And all of a sudden, boom, it just stopped one day. Just stopped and hasn't grown since. Now, you know, that's, that's not coincidence. That's, that's not even organic. Which, because generally things, something growing, it just keeps growing, right? But, oh no, no, suddenly it stopped. I've had the same experience. So, so we know people are the problem, not the technology, but how people will use it. This is Bishop E.W. jackson in for Abraham Hamilton III here on the Hamilton Corner standby. We'll be back in just a moment for more discussion.
Call for Listener Support to Sustain American Family Radio and the Podcast
Abraham Hamilton III Hello, I'm Abraham Hamilton iii. Did you know that this content is listener supported? Without people like you, this podcast would not exist. That's why we need you. A generous monthly gift of any amount will help sustain American Family Radio and specifically this podcast.
Invitation to Become a Monthly Financial Partner for American Family Radio
Please consider becoming a monthly financial partner today by visiting afr.netgive that's afr.net give.
Discussion on President Trump's Ban of Certain Media Outlets from the White House
Abraham Hamilton III Shining light into the darkness. This is the Hamilton Corner on American Family Radio.
Bishop EW Jackson We're back. This is Bishop E.W. jackson in for Abraham Hamilton III here on the Hamilton corner. Now, the sets. I wanted to put first of all, the issue of AI in front of you and ask what you think about that. I'll be taking your calls in the next segment. The number is 888-589-8840. The next thing I want to talk about is some of President Trump's actions here. I want to know what you think about these. One I think is completely justified. There's another that I think one could raise questions about. At least I would, but I don't think it's a terrible situation. So what am I getting at? Well, the first one is he banned CNN and ms, which is, I guess Marxist, socialist, and politico from the White House. And of course the media is up in arms. And, you know, he said this is what dictators do. And I mean, these people are so full of themselves. And it really is. He didn't ban all media. And I don't know how many media organizations are in the White House press corps, but I have to assume there's a hundred of them. I mean, I don't know. In fact, let me see if I can find out. But there's certainly more than three. And they're not the only liberals. So why did the President ban them? I don't think we're given a really, detailed answer on this, but let me just say, in my view, the President doesn't have to give a detailed answer because what we need to remember is this, while he's living there, it is his house. And I think if he banned all media from the White House and people probably would raise some questions about that because then they would say, well, my goodness. So he doesn't want to put out any news to anybody. In other words, he doesn't want his administration to be transparent. He doesn't want the people to know what the business of the government is that he's doing. And of course we as the people do have a right to know, to an appropriate extent. Obviously there's some state secrets and things that should not be revealed to the public. And we all understand that. But generally speaking, when it comes to policy, when it comes to decisions regarding the safety, the security, the well being of the American people, the money that we're spending, because it's our money, not President Trump's, not the Congress's, it's our money doesn't belong to the government, comes from us, we've got a right to know about those things. If the president shut all that down, then I think all of us would say, whoa, whoa, whoa, wait a minute, what is going on here? But that's not what he's done. He's just banned these three organizations,
Abraham Hamilton III I
Bishop EW Jackson think, and I have not caught up with this yet. But I think that, Vice President Vance has offered an explanation for what is on the president's mind in having done so. But, you know, frankly, from my perspective,
Abraham Hamilton III folks, I don't think the president owes
Bishop EW Jackson anybody an explanation unless he wants to give one. Because if these organizations are, in his view, misbehaving, telling lies, slandering him, putting out bad information, they can still, by the way, do their own investigating. They can still do their own reporting. He's not stopping them from reporting. It's just that they won't have access to the White House and may not have access to him anymore directly. They can still go to the legislature and ask questions. They can still catch him, moving about along with, I assume, the rest of the press gaggle and ask questions. But they're not gonna be given the privileged access of being in the White House anymore. And to me, that is a privilege. It is not a right of any media organization to be in the White House. It's just not. And these elite media types, they have been chagrined and angry over the president bringing in podcasters and bringing in conservative outlets and giving them an opportunity to be there to ask questions of the president and find out what the president is thinking and have direct access to him. They've been doing all that as well, and the media hates it. They've been opening it up, not closing it down. Yeah, I mean, you say, well, but he's bringing in people who would likely agree with him most of the time, probably, but those people have generally been shut out, and the media never complained about that, as these really are a bunch of spoiled wimps who just want their way and feel like they're somehow special, like they are God's gift to the country. And how dare you suggest that any media outlet, particularly these three. CNN, the Communist News Network, MS, the Marxist Socialist Network, and Politico. How dare you suggest that they should not have access to the President of the United States and the White House? Yeah, well, I dare suggest it. I don't think they have a right to it. And so they don't have it now for the time being. And so goodbye, good riddance. Now, that's one thing. and I completely agree with what the president has done. I don't I don't see that there's a problem with that at all. And I think who are complaining about it are just spoiled brats. And all this stuff about that's what dictators do is nonsense. Are they that ignorant or are they just willing to say almost anything even if it doesn't make sense just to get a row out of people and try to get people worked out? A, dictator shuts the press down and doesn't allow anybody to say anything other than what has been approved by the government. That's what a dictator does. Now somebody needs to tell these dumb dumbs that the President doesn't come anywhere near that because he simply doesn't have the power to do that. He can complain, he can say, I don't like this outlet. I don't like that outlet. I wish they wouldn't say this. I don't want them to say that they're wrong. He can do that, but that's all he can do because they can print anything or write anything or say anything they want, even if it's wrong,
Caroline because
Bishop EW Jackson that's what the First Amendment allows them to do. he's a dictator. I mean, these people need to, they really, somebody needs to give them a lesson in civics or something because they just, here again, I don't know whether it is just gross ignorance or whether just, just gross venality. So they just say these things because they like the echo chamber that they say them in and they like hearing themselves tell these lies and put forth this slander because they think it makes President Trump look bad. It makes them look good because now his there is, there is poor, wounded victims. Oh, we feel so sorry for them. Look, look, they have been the victims of a dictator. I mean, what they're really victims of is their own psychological dysfunction, frankly, because that's what that is. I mean, that's paranoid delusion. President Trump is, he's nobody's dictator and he is no threat to our constitutional republic whatsoever. They are, they are the ones who are. Because when you have a corrupt media that won't tell the truth, that is the kind of thing that can erode a system like ours from within. Jesus said, you should know the truth. The truth shall make you free. Well, if you got people manufacturing lies, what are those lies calculated to do? Put people in bondage? If one is true, the other is true. If lies make you free, the truth makes you a slave. And that's really what they, what they are. They don't. They're, probably Too stupid to understand this. But that's really what they're getting at. Because really what they want is a system that forces people into the mold that they want us to fit into. Now what is that? It might not be direct slavery and chains and physical chains, but, but it is a kind of social and cultural pressure that is the equivalent of slavery. That's what every communist system is. That's what every socialist system is. imagine China with its demerit system. If you are heard to say things or do things contrary to the expectations of the Communist Party of China, you can get demerits. And, and when you get those demerits, your privileges, your shopping privileges, your working privileges, where you live, are circumscribed in order to punish you for not conforming to what the party expects. What is that? That's slavery. Just slavery by another name. And these, these media people with all of their, their touted commitment to freedom, they're not commit, committed to freedom at all. They're committed to imposing upon the American people their way of thinking. And they really have a major problem with the fact that we think for ourselves. Which is why, you know, you've seen all these, appellations applied to us, you know, the deplorables and yeah,
Caroline you
Bishop EW Jackson name it, that's the most infamous one. But everything you can imagine to suggest that we're just stupid, we're automatons, we don't think for ourselves. What they really mean is we don't think the way they think. And for them, that demonstrates that we're really not even worthy of freedom because we don't really know what to do with it. Because if we really knew what to do with it, we would mimic exactly what they tell us to do. So, yeah, they're out of the White House. Boo hoo. Oh, what a tragic day it is for quote, unquote, our democracy. Well, we're not a democracy anyway. We're a constitutional republic. And they need to get a revelation on that as well.
Parting Ways on President Trump's Meeting with Muslim Socialists like Mamdani
Bishop EW Jackson so that was, that was one thing. The other thing, before I run out of time, here, is the visit to Mamdani. Now I tell you, here's where the President and I part company. Not because I think he's doing something wrong, I guess. But folks, I couldn't do it. I really couldn't. Because I really believe that Mamdani and El Sayed and these Muslim socialists, I really believe that they're out to destroy this country. I really believe that that's not just something I say because I think it sounds good. Or like these leftists do, he's a dictator. I mean, they just say this stupid stuff. if they really believe that, they really, they're truly idiots. But I say this based on very rational, logical facts. This is the history of Islam. Infiltration and takeover. Infiltration and takeover. And Mamdani has made clear he is a socialist. He doesn't like private property. He doesn't like capitalism. I don't think he even likes this country. And El sayed the same thing. You, know, it's American behavior that kind of brought 911 on us and we kind of did it to ourselves. And if you think that way about America, that tells me not only do you not like our country, you hate it. But it's like I always said about President Barack Obama. I said. And his wife as much as said this, didn't she? The only. She said, she said, I have never been proud of my country. Or something to that effect. I've never been proud of my country until now. Meaning that the only thing they like about America is when it puts them in power. Other than that, America does nothing. Right? So, Mom, Donnie, we've got people come from all over the world and see our grocery store system and just can't believe it. I mean, they're in awe. Mom, Donnie thinks NewSong York can do better. They can put up a couple of grocery stores, only going to cost about $30 million, but no big deal. And they're going to do it better than the grocery stores because they don't like our free market system. They think that the government is a much better way to decide who gets what. And in every country where that's been tried, what do people have? Long lines and few choices. Long lines, long waits, few choices. And for the President to sit down with him, to me, it does nothing for President Trump. I think it does a lot for Mamdani, because in the end it. Well, you know, maybe, maybe he can be worked with. Maybe, maybe we can see some legitimacy in him. I don't. I don't. And I've heard all kinds of explanations. Well, he's a businessman. He's thinking about what happens after he leaves the presidency. He's got a lot of business in NewSong York, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. I don't know. I don't know the President personally. I don't know what's thinking about this. But I'll tell you what, it gives me a queasy feeling when I see him standing with Mamdani and the two of them are smiling because I think Mamdani is a threat to our constitutional republic. And when I say that, folks, I don't mean in any way to suggest that somebody needs to take him out or any crazy stuff like that. I'm just saying people shouldn't be voting for folks like this. I mean, remember, Mamdani was not born in the United States of America. Thank God he's not eligible for the presidency. Whew, man.
Bishop EW Jackson Not that I can't believe the American people would vote for him, but I remember. Who was it just recently? I've been saying for a long time, I would never vote for a Muslim to do anything in our country. I just wouldn't. That doesn't mean they don't have the legal right to run. That doesn't mean the American people don't have the legal right to vote for them. They do. And I'm not saying I would outlaw that or there's something. No, I'm just saying I personally, as a Christian, as a citizen of our constitutional republic, I would not vote for one of them because I do not believe that their ideological and theological perspective is compatible with our constitutional republic. I wouldn't vote for them. But I heard somebody saying that. Who was it? Oh, yeah. Dannah Bash. That's deplorable. I can't. I can't believe. That's just horrible that anybody would think that. Yeah, well, if you love this country, to me that's the only way you can think. The number is 8885-8988-4088-8589-8840. Any topic I brought up or anything you want to bring up, feel free.
Alternative Email Services and the Need for God's Intervention Against Big Tech Control
Give me a call back in a moment.
Kendra Fostering and adoption is not a band aid for infertility. Like, it is a calling and God can change the desire of your heart and make that so rewarding. It's the most beautiful, selfless thing. It's pure religion, but it's not a fix to I desire biological challenge. God has to deal with that in your heart separately.
Resources for Informed Voting and Preserving Freedoms: Introducing I Voter Guide
Bishop EW Jackson Hannah's heart encouraging coup through infertility and miscarriage. Saturdays, 4am Central on AFR or on the AFR app.
Jeff Chamblee Are you concerned the media and candidates may not provide valid information so you can vote wisely and preserve your religious, political and economic freedoms? Ivyerguide.com is not connected to any candidate, but researches thousands of candidates across the nation, gathering scorecards, donation records, endorsements and candidate questionnaires. Go to ivoterguide.com to get factual information that's ivoterguide.com.
Revisiting Trump's White House Media Ban and Churchill Bust Removal: Presidential Prerogative
Abraham Hamilton III The Hamilton Quarter podcast and one minute commentaries are available at afr.net Back to the Hamilton Corner on American Family radio.
Bishop EW Jackson We're back. J.D. vance said this quote, if you're going to engage in what effectively is far left propaganda, why would a Republican White House give you special access? He said, that's what the President decided, that we're not going to give you special access to the White House if you engage in what is effectively far left propaganda. I think that's completely within the President's purview. I said, after all, it is his house while he's living there. Now, he doesn't get to permanently live there, but while he's living there, it is his house. I mean, I had a major problem when Barack Obama got into the White House and removed the bust of, Winston Churchill. I forget what he replaced it with, but he basically sent it into, some archive basement somewhere because he, And I remember him saying, yeah, because Churchill's associated with colonialism and what a, what a man. I tell you, boy, that is ignorance gone to seed. So he basically. Have you never read a history book? You never read about Winston Churchill being the courageous proponent for Great Britain standing up against the Nazis? That means nothing to him. No, because, you know, he's, he's associated with colonialism. I mean, come on, read a book. I mean, my goodness gracious, that again, colonialism is just like slavery. People were exploring the world and I, say that was the age of conquest and the strong subjugated the weak. It happened everywhere. It happened intercontinentally, it happened intra continentally, it happened on continents, it happened between continents. It was the way of the world. But somehow that disqualified Winston. So. But you know what, in the end, while he was living there, it was his house. And if he didn't want to bust, up Winston Churchill. So I did Ward Churchill. He didn't want to bust up Winston Churchill in his Oval Office while he was living there. That's his prerogative. I thought he was completely wrong, but that's the way it works. And we can't force him, say, well, we're going to. You got to have that bust in there anyway. Not while he's living there. So President Trump doesn't want people in his house while he's living there. He put them out. And, so deal with it. They're suing, of course. Try to get back in the numbers. 8, 8, 8, 5, 8, 9. That's 8, 8, 8, 589-8840, 8. 885-89-8840. We got four lines. Let's come right to you. Barbara in Georgia.
Caller Perspectives on AI, Islam's Incompatibility with Western Life, and Avoiding Fear
Barbara, welcome.
Caroline Hello. thank you. Well, I pretty much agree with everything you talked about tonight, but, but I'll hit on two things.
Caroline AI.
Caroline AI is already out of the box. somehow the, the bandwidth, the, the power that's associated with it is bringing us to that prophecy in the Bible that talks about. they're going to merge themselves, but they won't fit. You know, it's such a large bandwidth, they're able to send literally traces of human, humans and demons are jumping on the bandwagon. I can't prove it to you, but I know the area I live in. It is pronounced and it is widespread and we have computers that have detected this kind of stuff. So, so that's AI people, they just need to get with God because that's the only defense against it. the other one is Islam. Islam is totally and completely incompatible with the western way of life in any country. You can go back across history the problem and find nation after nation they've Trojan horse thin with the lie of peaceful religion. It ain't a religion, that's the first thing. It is a controlling Iranical philosophy. And wherever they go, that is what they do. They destroy nation upon nation. Why? Because they're emissaries of the devil. And you can line their book up with our book and it's never going to match.
Bishop EW Jackson All right, Barbara, Barbara, listen, you preaching. Thank you for the call, Barbara. I mean, yeah, I agree with you entirely. That's why by the way, that was first Timothy, second Timothy, chapter one, verse seven. I think I gave you the wrong site when I quoted it. First Timothy, chapter one, verse seven. But God has not given us a spirit of fear, but of love and power and a sound mind. So we don't need to be frightened of AI. Are there appropriate parameters that should be set? Sure, I don't have a problem with that. but fear of it turning it over to communist China. But to me, if you want to talk about fear, that would be a much more frightening scenario. So like I say about Iran, I don't like these high gas prices any more than anybody else does.
Prioritizing National Security Over Short-Term Economic Concerns like Gas Prices
And I'm not some multi billionaire where it doesn't really matter. It matters to me and my wife and to our budget. But I'll tell you what, I'd rather pay a little bit higher gas than have a nuclear weapon head hitting for me. And I know that's exactly what Iran would do. If somebody did not put a stop to it, and President Trump has done that, and I think the rest of this stuff will get under control. Maybe not as quickly as we'd like. I hope it happens quickly enough to affect the elections. But even if it doesn't, I hope the American people, particularly Christians, realize we're. We're playing the long game here, and we can't just kind of vote short term pocketbook issues while the fate and security of our nation is at stake. Let's go to Jane in Oklahoma.
Discussion on BRICS Nations, Their Agenda, and President Trump's Meetings with Mamdani
I believe that is Jane. Welcome.
Caroline Hi. Good to hear you, Bishop Jackson.
Bishop EW Jackson Thank you.
Caroline Listen, I remember way back when Mamdani got elected, they said that his. He was bankrolled by his mother in India. Now, the brick India is one of the Brics nations. I guess it's, Brazil, Russia, India, China, and okay, they are. They were gathered together with express purpose of bringing down the look that. I'm surprised nobody heard that, I guess when I did. But it's, It's. It's. It's regarding a lot of this stuff that I hear going down, and I go, brics nations.
Caroline Brics nations. Why aren't you talking about that?
Bishop EW Jackson Yeah.
Caroline So what do you think?
Bishop EW Jackson Well, Jane, I guess I want to ask you this question because we. I love President Trump. I think he's really done a tremendous job serving this country. what do you think he is trying to accomplish in this is now the second or third meeting with Mamdani? What do you think he's trying to do from your perspective?
Caroline Well, I can't gainsay, Trump. He's always a surprise, and it's often a smile. But, I think maybe he's. You know what I mean? Anyway, I think that perhaps he's trying to do something to, soften that or whatever is going on here.
Bishop EW Jackson Yeah. So better. Better the. The. The enemy, you know, than the enemy, you don't. Or is it. What was the old Godfather saying, Keep your. Keep your friends close and your enemies closer. So, I don't know. He's. He is a strategist. Jane, thank you for the call. We, got four lines here. Let me. Let me go on. Gives. Go ahead. Go forward and give someone else. We've got Pamela in Tennessee. Pamela, welcome.
The Compatibility of Islam with the US Constitution and the Decline of Western Civilization
Hi, Pamela, you there?
Caroline Yes, I'm here.
Bishop EW Jackson Go right ahead. Pamela, you're on.
Caroline Okay.
Caroline Thank you for taking my call. My question is, why would any Muslim be allowed to run for any public office in the United States of America based upon their beliefs or ideology? Because it is antithetical to our Constitution? And why would it not be considered, treasonous or an attempted cool coup to our Constitution and our way of life?
Bishop EW Jackson Wow, Pamela, that is a loaded question. Thank you so much for the call, Pamela. Well, first of all, folks, believe it or not, we have a very limited, very limited restrictions on who may and may not run for office in our country. I mean, for example, you all may not have ever thought about this, but do you know that a convicted felon cannot vote in most jurisdictions, but do you know that that same convicted felon could actually run for office? Yeah, I know. Seems a little bit weird, doesn't it? But you couldn't vote for yourself, but you could run. our Constitution really opens it up for almost anybody to run for anything. And, and I don't see any legal prescriptions. That's why I said I don't. I'm not saying the American people don't have a legal right to vote for a Muslim. I'm not saying, a Muslim, if he's an American citizen or she is an American citizen, doesn't have a right to vote legally. But I am saying the American people ought not vote for them. and by the way, I looked up brics, which I'd heard of before, but I hadn't really paid much attention to it. But it is an intergovernmental organization, of ah, major emerging economies that is designed to increase global influence and get this counterbalance Western dominated institutions. Now what in the world does that mean? I'll tell you what it means to oppose the United States because Great, Britain and France and Spain and Germany, I mean, they're pretty much irrelevant at this point. It's to counterbalance the United States. We bestride the Western world. I tell people always when they say we've got to save Western civilization, I say, well then say what you really mean. You've got to save America.
Agreeing with Trump's Media Access Decisions and Viewing Islam as a False Religion
Because Western civilization, if you're talking about Europe, it's gone already. Muslims have pretty much taken over and they've completely rejected their Christian and Judeo Christian heritage. So thank you for the call, Pamela. Let's go to Arlen in Texas. Arlen, welcome. Arlen, are you there?
Caroline yes sir. Thanks for taking my call. I'll listen to you for several years.
Bishop EW Jackson Thank you.
Caroline I just want to agree on the, situation with President Trump. He has, like you say, he has a right to let whoever come in there and those people have been lying for a long time. I don't, I'm not. I might mess up the Dan Rather thing where he got kicked off the air. I want to say he kind of botched up a story about President Bush and they kicked him off the air, if I remember right.
Bishop EW Jackson Yep.
Caroline Well, these people, they botched up all kinds of stories and they just keep on, they're able to keep on lying and then agree with you and several of the other callers on the Muslims. I mean, that's, in my opinion, that's a false religion. And they are like you say, you hear, they come in, they want to be friendly or whatever at the beginning, but then when, when the majority of them get in there and take over, then they're, they're kicking you out. Just like in Minneapolis and all that up there. I don't even know how that was even allowed to happen. You know, I mean, that's, it's confusing to be honest with you. But I'll let you go. Let some other people, ah, call in.
Bishop EW Jackson Well, all. And thank you so much for the call. folks, I'm going to be in Detroit in a couple of days and my understanding is Detroit has been completely taken over by Islam. Dearborn, as you all know, which is not far away. My understanding Dearborn is a Muslim city and I've heard people report that you can hear the call to Muslim prayer. You think you're in the Middle East. right. That's not fitting into American culture. That's taking over certain areas and you know, the imposition of Sharia law and all of that. I mean, all kinds of issues here. And by the way, let me just say, folks, we don't hate Muslims. God loves them and he wants them. We're talking now about the national security and well being of the United States of America and whether Islam is compatible with it. And it has say anything about hating Muslims, but we do hate what it represents. And I just want to underscore what Allan said. It is a false religion. It is a false religion, period. It is not legitimate. It is a ancient cult. And I've said before, I'll say it again, I hate Islam. I don't hate Muslims, but I hate Islam because it's a false way.
Addressing Gmail's Dominance and Trusting God to Bring Big Tech to Heel
Trying to convince people that it's the true way. Okay, we got time for one more call. Let's go to Julie in Arkansas. Julie, welcome.
Caroline Yes, I just wanted to give you an alternative to Gmail. and that is proton P R O T O N. I use it.
Bishop EW Jackson I use it.
Caroline Do you? Okay. Okay, cool. I just knew that you were talking about Gmail earlier and it's kind of like, oh, so, yeah, I'm Julie.
Bishop EW Jackson Here's the problem. Julie, here's the problem. Gmail has got the email system cornered. I mean, think about it. How many people do you know who don't have a Gmail account even if they have something else? Almost everybody has a Gmail account. And that's the problem. It is so widespread now. They've got so much power over our ability to communicate with each other that something's got to reign them in. and so you all pray for us because I say Google may be big, but they're not bigger than God. and I think it's going to take the hand of God bringing these people to heal. So we're working on it. Believe me. We're not. Certainly not the size of a Google by any stretch of the imagination, but David wasn't the size of Goliath either, but he brought him down. Folks, that's going to do it for today. As always, great to be with you. Thank you all so much. God bless each and every one of you, and I appreciate your encouragement.
Concluding Thoughts: Standing Up, Stepping Up, Speaking Up, and Refusing to Back Down
Stand up. Step up.
Caroline Speak up.
Bishop EW Jackson Refuse to back up. Because we cannot be defeated if we will not quit because we are on God's side.
Caroline M.
Jeff Chamblee The views and opinions expressed in this broadcast may not necessarily reflect those of the American Family association or American Family Radio.
Guest Host, Bishop E.W. Jackson, does a deep dive on Artificial Intelligence
Live
Did you know American Family Radio is listener-supported? Your monthly financial support will allow us to continue upholding Godly values through our numerous channels, like American Family Radio, One Million Moms, The Stand magazine, and many more.
Become a Great Commission Partner TODAY to help AFR transform culture by rebuilding the family. When you donate today, you’ll get access to:
